A Public Service Messageby S.M. Oliva, Mises Economics Blog
Dec. 02, 2010
Black Guy Walks Into Starbucks, Calls Them 'Racist,' Demands Free Coffee, Gets It Immediately
Shania Twain Apologizes For Saying She Would Have Voted Trump
Laura Ingraham Interviews Comedian Who Requested Free Coffee From Starbucks As 'Reparations'
Report: Trump Asked Netenyahu If He Genuinely Cares About Peace
Syria Says U.S.-Led Strike Destroyed Pharmaceutical Research Institute Working On Cancer Drugs
Iíll have more to say on the whole Wikileaks thing later, but Iím a little disturbed by the reaction Iíve seen by some libertarians to one developing aspect of the story. The London Guardian reported:
The United States struck its first blow against WikiLeaks after Amazon.com pulled the plug on hosting the whistleblowing website in an apparent reaction to heavy political pressure.In response, Iíve seen a few libertarians who are now calling for their own boycott of Amazon --†ĒI wonít be shopping there this holiday season,Ē etc. -- to protest the companyís capitulation. Iím sorry, but thatís childish and stupid. First of all, youíre adopting the very tactics the state used against Amazon. Second, what youíre basically saying is that youíre going to let statists like Joe Lieberman decide where you will and wonít shop. Thatís asinine. Third, itís one thing to boycott a firm that actively colludes with the state or, say, lobbies for political favors; Amazon was a victim here, not a belligerent.
Given that you have prominent political and media personalities demanding the outright murder of Wikileaks officials, I think itís a reasonable act of self-preservation for Amazon to heed these threats. Iím normally the first to criticize companies that fail to stand up to bullying by government regulators. But for the moment, this is a much different, and much more volatile, situation. The anti-Wikileaks forces are led by mentally and emotionally unbalanced animals. Right now they are capable of anything. Amazon is under no ethical duty to stick their necks out in this context.
But back to my original point. While everyone has to decide for themselves where and when to ďboycottĒ a company, I respectfully suggest a policy of punishing those firms that yield to state pressure does nothing to advance the cause of liberty. I know of many small businesses that were forced to sign ďconsent ordersĒ at gunpoint. Would it be ethical to boycott these mom-and-pop stores as well to send a message to the aggressors? I think not. And I think that applies even to large, successful businesses like Amazon.