Most Prefer Airport Body Scanner to Pat-DownRasmussen ReportsNov. 03, 2010 |
"I'm Not an Agent for the Israeli Govt," Mark Levin Says at Israeli-Govt-Sponsored Event in Jerusalem
Mark Levin Flying to Israel as Netanyahu Reportedly Seeks to 'Leverage' Levin to Trash Trump's Iran Deal
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Vice President JD Vance Reacts to InfoLib Clip of John Podhoretz Melting Down Over Iran Deal
Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro Throw a Fit Over Trump Announcing Iran Deal
![]() Not much of a choice, let's see how many don't want to go through either.Airports across the country, from Washington, D.C. to Seattle, are beginning to install new full-body scanners as part of their security checkpoints. But for privacy reasons, many Americans oppose the scanners which show full-body nude images of the passenger to a screener in another room. In the wake of the latest terrorist bombing attempt last week, the Department of Homeland Security may soon require full-body pat-downs of all boarding airline passengers if they refuse to go through the full-body scanner. A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that, given the choice, 69% of Likely U.S. voters would rather go through the full-body scanner at the airport than be subjected to a full body pat-down. (To see survey question wording, click here.) Twenty-two percent (22%) would opt for the pat-down rather than go through the scanner Read More |