informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...


An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand
Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"
The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future
(more)
Article posted Oct 31 2009, 11:09 PM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: Computerworld Print

Government considers cutting home internet service during pandemic

by Patrick Thibodeau

The government's answer to their crimes and lies being exposed by the internet. - ChrisThe U.S. has a dark box of options for keeping Internet traffic flowing during a pandemic, including restricting the bandwidth capability of home modems.

The feds have already shown their willingness to impose their power on carriers because of national security, something that happened after 9/11 with the Patriot Act. If a pandemic keeps large numbers of the workforce at home and causes network congestion, the U.S. government will likely act again.

Most businesses and government agencies have diverse routing and pay carriers handsomely for bandwidth rich connections. But if a pandemic keeps 30% or more of the population at home, the so-called low bandwidth "last mile" to homes will be critical but in trouble as legions of at-home employees attempt work along with those playing networked games and streaming video.

Voluntary appeals to reduce Internet use will likely be the first option for policy makers. But if that doesn't work, the U.S. General Accountability Office report this week on pandemic planning and networks, outlined some of the other possibilities.

One "technically feasible alternative," wrote the GAO, is to temporarily cripple home user modems:
Although providers cannot identify users at the computer level to manage traffic from that point, two providers stated that if the residential Internet access network in a particular neighborhood was experiencing congestion, a provider could attempt to reduce congestion by reducing the amount of traffic that each user could send to and receive from his or her network. Such a reduction would require adjusting the configuration file within each customer's modem to temporarily reduce the maximum transmission speed that that modem was capable of performing-for example, by reducing its incoming capability from 7 Mbps to 1 Mbps.
That action would violate service level of agreement and likely require a government directive, according to the GAO

Another option would be shut down those Internet sites that account for most the traffic volume, or ask the carriers to block access to those sites, which may be similar to what China does now and what Iran tried to do. The GAO wrote:
However, most providers' staff told us that blocking users from accessing such sites, while technically possible, would be very difficult and, in their view, would not address the congestion problem and would require a directive from the government. One provider indicated that such blocking would be difficult because determining which sites should be blocked would be a very subjective process. Additionally, this provider noted that technologically savvy site operators could change their Internet protocol addresses, allowing users to access the site regardless. ... Shutting down such sites without affecting pertinent information would be a challenge for providers and could create more Internet congestion as users would repeatedly try to access these sites.
This issue will weigh on policy makers and they may take a lesson from Katrina. If the U.S. waits too long to prepare with either voluntary or involuntary actions, then it may be responding well after the traffic torrent has interrupted critical services.


SHARE:



Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Video: As Usual, MSM Gushingly "Predicts" Our Fascist Future
- Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
- Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
- Philly Mayor Defends Tax on Bloggers
- 4th Amendment Violating Mobile X-Ray Scanners Hit The Streets
- Government: Secretly Watching Students Not a Crime
- TSA scares and violates child's personal space, X-rays her teddy bear
- Government Using Google Earth To Loot Destitute Americans









Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Dave

Posted: Nov 01 2009, 6:31 AM

Link
<The governments answer to their crimes - Chris>

I think it helps to penetrate what government is as a concept (ignoring that it is in reality a proxy run from behind the scenes), to understand why it is such a monster as it is. Most of the populous are not informed as to its true nature. It is total sabotage with only sufficient sensibility not to threaten its existance, ie it does what it can get away with.

People often aspire in this world to accumulate money, the reason this is so is that in a political economy money is a means to independance. That is to say people want their own lives and to master them that they can live them with some means to make their own decisions (freedom). One way to model this is to say they want to be their own executive, I use that term as it is used in political phylosophy (dictatorship designs like republics, democracies, federations, democracies, capitalism, socialism, communism etc.)

If I want a dictatorship I design a society with a seperate executive. This organ has a life on its own, a seperate organ. It will seek independance just as a human does. Thus to have more independance from everything it must have more power to function as itself and it tends automatically to dictatorship.

A human that seeks to master their own life does not mean that they are master to everyone else's. A government automatically seeks to master everyone elses and grows until people call time though from behind the scenes they are pulled over before people do or through a controlled revolution.

In britain it had a monarch, monarchs are useful to exert influence over a wide area, government to create local dictatorships. I asserted self sovereignty formally some time ago, thus my executive is not ruled by the political output for example law. When I say I am not subject to law in britain I get strange looks from people who have come to believe in that construct no matter it contradicts with the truth of their lives.

Some might think I can therefore murder people. I could do so irrespective of law, the reason I asserted sovereignty was because the state was overtly torturing and murdering people out of malice (my belief in state fractured). In essense I set myself sovereign in all juresdictions precisely because I did not wish to be a murder.
Dave

Posted: Nov 01 2009, 6:54 AM

Link
The above thinking suggests that government (seperated executive) is corrupt by its existance and as a political unit (decisions taken that have other people doing their bidding unwittingly or unwillingly) it is not sustainable, the present being proof not ever so far.

Part of the picture can be dangerous. The executive would not want to put itself at risk knowing that the s*t does hit the fan regularly so they in turn operate governments remotely and use governments as a proxy to attack people with. As governments and the form of economic dictatorship used was failing to maintain power layers are added. Thus government uses the term 'transparency', a euphemism for moving the executive outside when it is already substantially outside. That is to say, governments are themselves held prisoner as they are just a proxy for power in practice.

Governments are not powerful enough to halt mankind from finding reason, what they do is look ahead and try to get a roadblock in first maintaining an illusion of control. There is one world, with travel people are finding they like visiting their neighbours. In go border controls, in goes a new proxy government in the form of an overt proxy world government.

I don't accept censoring the internet, if that is a thought others come to also and in time the government will not dare to.
THWAPPING Dave

Posted: Nov 01 2009, 7:13 AM

Link
12496 Yep, I agree. Corporatism's enemy number 1 is the Internet. They know it too. It is difficult to control. So, their first attempt is in place. Waiting for attempt number 2.
Dave

Posted: Nov 01 2009, 7:26 AM

Link
The net is peer to peer, it is a threat to the lie. They have made many attempts to publicly justify its censorship. When I was out in ireland a couple of years ago the censorship there was severe, unofficial news sites simply excluded. Last time out they they had been hit with economic terrorism, hit hard and by official account since voted yes to the lisbon treaty having vote no before. Pavlov's dog wasn't really about a dog, nor is yes a truthful answer if only they knew. Not so easy because of the censorship.

Technically internet censorship is easy and the infrastructure in place by a range of means. In practice it is no good if people see and understand the con which it is.
RS Wigley

Posted: Nov 21 2009, 8:28 PM

Link
69246 So...... if a pandemic results in everyone sitting their fat asses on the computah, doing the internets, the gubment will restrict everyone to 1mbps speed? Sounds like a good idea. Or in y'alls paranoid minds I guess 1mbps is censorship & tyranny.

This would have the opposite effect: it would keep the internet running.
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

10 Signs The U.S. is Becoming a Third World Country - 08/16SHOCK VIDEO: Alaska State Trooper Grabs at Citizen's Cell Phone Camera During Routine Traffic Stop! - 08/16Government Roid Rage Returns - 08/20Life for Half an Ounce of Medical Marijuana? - 08/12Video: NYPD Undercover Cop Threatens Cameraman with Rape - 08/19Video: Valedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling - 08/12California surfer films great white sharks circling his board - 08/12Murder a Kid, Plant a Gun -- Take a Vacation - 08/11

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human CivilizationValedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling in Graduation SpeechFeds Ignore Due Process, First Amendment, Shut Down 73,000 BlogsObama Administration Announces Massive Piracy CrackdownNew Bill Gives Obama 'Kill Switch' To Shut Down The InternetThe "Tax Mahal": A Shrine to Corporate SocialismBilderberg 2010: Between the sword and the wallObama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial
(more)

 
Top