informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...


An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand
Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"
The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future
(more)
Article posted Oct 29 2007, 4:32 AM Category: Commentary Source: Rogue Government Print

House Passes Thought Crime Prevention Bill

By Lee Rogers

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law, it will also establish a commission and a Center of Excellence to study and defeat so called thought criminals. Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.

First let's take a look at the definitions of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism as defined in Section 899A of the bill.

The definition of violent radicalization uses vague language to define this term of promoting any belief system that the government considers to be an extremist agenda. Since the bill doesn�t specifically define what an extremist belief system is, it is entirely up to the interpretation of the government. Considering how much the government has done to destroy the Constitution they could even define Ron Paul supporters as promoting an extremist belief system. Literally, the government according to this definition can define whatever they want as an extremist belief system. Essentially they have defined violent radicalization as thought crime. The definition as defined in the bill is shown below.

`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.

The definition of homegrown terrorism uses equally vague language to further define thought crime. The bill includes the planned use of force or violence as homegrown terrorism which could be interpreted as thinking about using force or violence. Not only that but the definition is so vaguely defined, that petty crimes could even fall into the category of homegrown terrorism. The definition as defined in the bill is shown below.

`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Section 899B of the bill goes over the findings of Congress as it pertains to homegrown terrorism. Particularly alarming is that the bill mentions the Internet as a main source for terrorist propaganda. The bill even mentions streams in obvious reference to many of the patriot and pro-constitution Internet radio networks that have been formed. It also mentions that homegrown terrorists span all ages and races indicating that the Congress is stating that everyone is a potential terrorist. Even worse is that Congress states in their findings that they should look at draconian police states like Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom as models to defeat homegrown terrorists. Literally, these findings of Congress fall right in line with the growing patriot community.

The biggest joke of all is that this section also says that any measure to prevent violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism should not violate the constitutional rights of citizens. However, the definition of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism as they are defined in section 899A are themselves unconstitutional. The Constitution does not allow the government to arrest people for thought crimes, so any promises not to violate the constitutional rights of citizens are already broken by their own definitions.

`SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.

`The Congress finds the following:

`(1) The development and implementation of methods and processes that can be utilized to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in the United States is critical to combating domestic terrorism.

`(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security.

`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.

`(4) While the United States must continue its vigilant efforts to combat international terrorism, it must also strengthen efforts to combat the threat posed by homegrown terrorists based and operating within the United States.

`(5) Understanding the motivational factors that lead to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence is a vital step toward eradicating these threats in the United States.

`(6) The potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily prevented through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and requires the incorporation of State and local solutions.

`(7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals should not be targeted based solely on race, ethnicity, or religion.

`(8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.

`(9) Certain governments, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have significant experience with homegrown terrorism and the United States can benefit from lessons learned by those nations.


Section 899C calls for a commission on the prevention of violent radicalization and ideologically based violence. The commission will consist of ten members appointed by various individuals that hold different positions in government. Essentially, this is a commission that will examine and report on how they are going to deal with violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism. So basically, the commission is being formed specifically on how to deal with thought criminals in the United States. The bill requires that the commission submit their final report 18 months following the commission's first meeting as well as submit interim reports every 6 months leading up to the final report. Below is the bill�s defined purpose of the commission. Amazingly they even define one of the purposes of the commission to determine the causes of lone wolf violent radicalization.

(b) Purpose- The purposes of the Commission are the following:

`(1) Examine and report upon the facts and causes of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in the United States, including United States connections to non-United States persons and networks, violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in prison, individual or `lone wolf' violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence, and other faces of the phenomena of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence that the Commission considers important.

`(2) Build upon and bring together the work of other entities and avoid unnecessary duplication, by reviewing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of--

`(A) the Center of Excellence established or designated under section 899D, and other academic work, as appropriate;

`(B) Federal, State, local, or tribal studies of, reviews of, and experiences with violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence; and

`(C) foreign government studies of, reviews of, and experiences with violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence.


Section 899D of the bill establishes a Center of Excellence for the Study of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism in the United States. Essentially, this will be a Department of Homeland Security affiliated institution that will study and determine how to defeat thought criminals.

Section 899E of the bill discusses how the government is going to defeat violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism through international cooperation. As stated in the findings section earlier in the legislation, they will unquestionably seek the advice of countries with draconian police states like the United Kingdom to determine how to deal with this growing threat of thought crime.

Possibly the most ridiculous section of the bill is Section 899F which states how they plan on protecting civil rights and civil liberties while preventing ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism. Here is what the section says.

`SEC. 899F. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY-BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.

`(a) In General- The Department of Homeland Security's efforts to prevent ideologically-based violence and homegrown terrorism as described herein shall not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.

`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the Department of Homeland Security's commitment to racial neutrality.

`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department of Homeland Security will develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.

'(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting at the end of the items relating to title VIII the following:


It states in the first subsection that in general the efforts to defeat thought crime shall not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights and civil liberties of the United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. How does this protect constitutional rights if they use vague language such as in general that prefaces the statement? This means that the Department of Homeland Security does not have to abide by the Constitution in their attempts to prevent so called homegrown terrorism.

This bill is completely insane. It literally allows the government to define any and all crimes including thought crime as violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism. Obviously, this legislation is unconstitutional on a number of levels and it is clear that all 404 representatives who voted in favor of this bill are traitors and should be removed from office immediately. The treason spans both political parties and it shows us all that there is no difference between them. The bill will go on to the Senate and will likely be passed and signed into the law by George W. Bush. Considering that draconian legislation like the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act have already been passed, there seems little question that this one will get passed as well. This is more proof that our country has been completely sold out by a group of traitors at all levels of government.


SHARE:



Latest Commentary
- Venus Needs Some Austrians
- 10 Statist Myths Debunked
- A Culture of Fear
- White House Plans Another Fake End to Iraq War
- The State's Bad Math
- Ayn Rand's message to Glenn Beck
- The Friends of the "Free Market" Are Its Worst Enemies
- The Market as a Redistributor of Wealth









Comments 1 - 20 of 26 Add Comment Page of 2 >
friendstacy

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:53 AM

Link
"There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution."

LOL! That's what they want you to think, isn't it? They expect you to sit back and do nothing, believing that your vote for Ron Paul is actually going to make a difference, expecting him to save you from this "evil" government. Be afraid! be very very afraid! That makes you much more gullible. You don't have to bother yourself with thinking, they'll tell you what to think and what to believe.

And just what will restoring the Constitution accomplish? Oh, it will restore people's willingness to be governed, that's what it will do. It is not about freedom, it never was. It's all about making the people want the government to control their lives. It's about creating blame, rather than responsibility. When it's about a minority, or the majority, one group rather than all, it's about dividing the people, not uniting them.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 10:28 AM

Link
If they can create and control the herd that is a great deal of power. Problem (constitution under attack), Reaction (an outrage), Solution (Ron Paul). Answer provided, thinking has been switched off (mind control), herd created and disabled, and the elite objectives fulfilled. As these laws are just more weapons for inquisition, i.e. all that counts is the accusation, they win either way.

The public is left to believe these are two options, i.e. vote for Ron Paul or be afraid of the government, presuming you 'believe' they won't come for you and you don't care for others.

Personally I see the landscape rather differently. The law is itself a terrorist offence; I reject it. That isn't about voting, I reject it outright and reserve the option of lawfully arresting anyone that supports it.

As for Ron Paul, he failed to audit the gold when he was on the oversight committee. No US president has overcome the objectives of the elites which now promise global catastrophe, Ron Paul has not demonstrated the wit or character to deal with such issues so I consider supporting him suicidal.

Those are part of my personal views and assessments. Quite rightly, people will have all manner of views, it is not dysfunction that we have different views, how we interact across those differences is the measure of all of us.
friendstacy

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 10:37 AM

Link
so I asked my mom what happened in the sixties. You know, right before I was born. I asked her if it's not the exact same thing happening again. I asked her what went wrong. I asked her why was MLK assassinated if nobody was really listening to what he was saying??? There's something in this recent history don't add up. A lesson we are sorely missing. A lesson we better learn soon, else have history repeat.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 6:18 PM

Link
2463 friendstacy Posted: Oct 29 2007, 10:37 AM
asks :
what happened in the sixties

Actuallly the sixties culture was a "Travistock" creation. It never had any substance other than sex, drugs and rock'n roll.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 6:42 PM

Link
2463 psssst friendstacy, over here:

http://oneheartbooks.com/books/mind_control/tavistock_coleman.htm
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 6:48 PM

Link
Tavistock = mind control / torture central (home of the Problem Reaction Solution) Hitler and Stalin a couple of their students.
http://100777.com/node/167

Tavistock psyops war training:
"In wartime, the truth is so precious we surround it with a bodygaurd of lies."

"In wartime, the truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." - Winston Churchill

"In wartime, we provide truth with a bodyguard of lies because it is so precious." - Adolf Hitler

(The British training of such characters as Usama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein is already in the public domain, controlled media included.)

such is the school of thought (two minds but with one Tavistock)
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 7:40 PM

Link
History, the future and how to change it becomes clearer when sense is made of history, not a simple task when there are typically many versions of history, only one substantially true and that story typically concealed from view.

Hitler was a Rothschild descendant, all the Rothchild's are illuminati and images of two of them recently posted to this site. I recently watched 'End Game' by Alex Jones, this includes a phone conversation with David Rothschild. His demeanour laid back and childlike, but the video recently posted to this site shows a lecture he gave to the financiers promoting the 'climate change' racket (if it hadn't been a racket it would still have been hijacked and exploited).
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:06 PM

Link
A fundamental component of the Tavistock Institute was Sigmond Freud, a person who looked at fundamentals of human behaviour, particularly the sex drive. (A Freud relative is covered on this site for creating America in the media section). I haven't checked the bloodline as with Hitler (not his real name, as with Stalin etc), but I have reason to think it worth checking.

"like Edward Bernays said the people must be controlled without them knowing it"
http://www.rense.com/general78/believe.htm

Sex drive is linked with aggression, I found out something about this when playing rugby against an all male boys school where the jokes abounded about them being on sexual suppressants. I think the jokes were wrong and Freud was right, all that pent up sexual energy came out on the rugby pitch and we were slaughtered by the most aggressive side I ever had the misfortune of playing against.

If mankind did not have an inherent motive to eat, breath and have sex, then the species would perhaps not have got to where we are now where there are quite a lot of us (hi, and welcome to my diatribe if you are reading).

(Mankind is special, it doesn't just have the primitive brain that evolution requires, self realisation and determination being just some of the many gifts which surpass normal evolutionary developments).

Progress through cults like freemasonry, structured religion, security agencies, politics, so many of the pyramids of power including commerce include sexual practices, often of a kind that form compromising secrets and also used in direct mind control practices.

A paedophile ring investigation in the UK some years ago resulted in documents being sealed for 100 years when Gordon Brown and international names surfaced in the enquiry. Both that issue and a similar one in relation to George Bush can be researched to a considerable extent on the Internet. I think Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson both had the embarrassment of being arrested in earlier times though both are now controlled and protected.

It is simpler to understand power in practice when one sees the levers behind it, the old adage being it isn't about who you know but what you know about who you know. Of all the bedfellows, power and secrecy being the most dangerous.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:18 PM

Link
Many of the characters in power are little people with a grudge, have a power complex in part because they are little people, selected for the the task because of those attributes as they can be moulded, compromised and controlled. They are also self-selected for those reasons as a world built on winners and losers rewards the worst endeavours.

A strange example perhaps but it is one that just came to mind. I sometimes was taken to an ice skating ring in south London as a kid. Some of the people were coloured, and I noticed those that were, had a lot of aggression and caused a lot of problems. The problem wasn't because they were black, it was because they were in the minority, were heavily disadvantaged and discriminated against and so saw (incorrectly) all whites as racists and a threat.

Due to all of the troubles they employed a bouncer on the skating rink and he was black. I was utterly shocked to see what he did, which was basically beat the hell out of anyone black who he thought was misbehaving, by presentation a paradox but it is cathartic for people externalise the grudge, just as a female rape victim might hate all men.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:24 PM

Link
The reason I give that example relates to the largest weapon of social control in the armoury; sex. I think it was Freud that said something like if you could control sex you could control everyone, please correct me if you know the original quote.

The terrorist accusations are laughed at, a nonsense well covered in the articles on this site. That propaganda isn't working, but sex crimes is the modern inquisition. You can see politicians, judges, businessmen, academics, police officers all jumping on the accusation bandwagon with a vicious venom.

This of course makes sense, as one would expect such sexual offences to be part of the means by which they were promoted or placed in office. They are externallising quite a fear, as what they would accuse you of, is what would terrify them if raised by accusation (quite likely they have something to hide) as in the Foley case, the man passing laws in the name of child protection being the perpetrator, a case of attempted extortion over sex secrets of the British Royal Family reaching the controlled media only this week.

sex and drugs and the Royal family
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iqzhoz7oPFG6rP_Pej9w84xepzEg
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:35 PM

Link
Censorship a serious issue so I include it in this whistlestop tour, thought crimes have already been on the books for some time. The first attempts to censor the Internet was based on, if you didn't know or couldn't guess; Hitler's (Tavistock's) favourite 'Child Protection'.

They often try to fake an academic base for passing laws, in this instance useful as they require pretending there is no constitution and as the laws have passed and the courts uphold them whether a constitution exists is a topic in itself.

First up was the Lockhart commission but it was unable to produce evidence in support of the legislation.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:42 PM

Link
The illuminati don't give up, and they decided to have an actor front the White House (arguably the job description) and they had a top list of five. Top of the list was Ronald Reagan and in his tenure another 'research' committee was set up called the Meese Commission (Edwin Meese the Attorney General). Academically this failed again though as usual it didn't stop them passing laws:

<The 1985 Commission on Pornography (the Meese Commission), chaired by Reagan's attorney general Edwin Meese and assembled specifically to overturn the 1970 findings, could not establish factual links between sexually explicit materials and antisocial behaviour either. Indeed, researchers have found more evidence that the opposite is true. Interviews of sex criminals including child molesters reveal that the children who eventually became rapists were usually exposed to pornography less than other kids; if they'd seen the same amount, the exposure had not occurred earlier in life that the other children's. According to Johns Hopkins University's John Money, one of the worlds foremost authorities on sexual abnormalities, "the majority of patients with paraphilias" - deviant sexual fantasies and behaviours - "described a strict anti-sexual upbringing in which sex was either never mentioned or was actively repressed or defiled.">

Although this can be seen as a simple story, once again behind the scenes the mechanisms of power only come to light when you look at the cast in some detail. A number of people on the commission were exposed both for their CIA connections and their involvement in child abuse, I think several books were written in the case of Father Ted.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:48 PM

Link
One problem with all these cults is these grudges have no time limit; the baton is passed on down the decades and even throughout history.

Another way to look at it, as some people may find the problems the world faces rather daunting, is the fact that the people who invisibly pull the strings of power, and those whose strings are pulled, are largely incompetent people with limited minds who are incapable of realising the full range of mental faculties that are gifted to most human beings.

Although Blair, Brown and Bush are typically in very controlled conditions, I watched the video of David Rothschild, another with Bill Gates, both appeared to not be able adjust to the context they were in as someone would who could perceive themselves and adapt as circumstances suggested appropriate.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 8:53 PM

Link
<There's something in this recent history don't add up. A lesson we are sorely missing. A lesson we better learn soon, else have history repeat.>

After MLK was assassinated, there was rioting. This gave the excuse for the police state to clamp down, and after a quick vent and massive control, it was all over.

You have a public who are generally pre-occupied with their own lives (a situation partly engineered), you have pyramids of secret power that follow their agenda until kingdom come, they destroy themselves or there is intervention. The public oblivious to the fact that right through time, these time bombs have been ticking, exploding and getting bigger, tens of millions already killed by them without even knowing this was so.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 9:15 PM

Link
There should not be this silence here. If you disagree, have things to add, what is important is the taking part, it is the lack of taking part that allows all this insane mayhem to occur or be engineered to occur.

Whatever you believe, if you aren't even sure, share your view. People must pick up the baton, share it, pass it on. It doesn't matter who you are, what you have is important as an inclusive world is the only one worth having and only the one worth having will endure. What is behind you doesn't matter, history cannot be changed but it can be realised and that will help shape the future.

The illuminati would not be a difficult problem if that was the only problem, but in truth we are all part of the problem. Most of all it was the public that failed after MLK was executed, that is something we should all consider. That is one of the reasons I often mention 9/11 and similar events, these have to be reconciled, that baton must be held firm for history is written by the victors, if it is written as it really was then for once truth is the victor. Truth is a baton worth passing to everyone and it will set people free.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 10:26 PM

Link
Although there has been so much manipulation by so few over so many for so long, that failure belongs to everyone and it is causal, the adage being united we stand, divided we fall.

To create a fictional story for evolution of 'society': Family A keeps to their own lives, Family B has a son and he really makes a nuisance of himself and disturbs family A. Family A finds other families disturbed and a police force is formed to keep the peace. The chap who was a nuisance in Family B joins the police force and ends up running it and a few centuries later that family has their finger on the armies, the nukes and every destructive device mankind could devise.

I contest in that story the failure was family A and their friends. Family B had a problem that was not self-repairing, only family A and their friends could. Sharing problems is helpful, but passing the buck creates an asylum with the least able in charge. Those reasons partly explain why reject the Ron Paul solution and I would contest there is only one family.

By definition there is a higher purpose in life than our own lives, by definition when we surrender truth and humanity, we pass on a debt to the next generation until it is too large to be repaid, by definition if we reconcile our history, we find out why we are here and what we should do.

When people mention the second world war, they pull out their hands, point their fingers at Hitler (problem), show contempt (reaction) and build up their own army (solution) and so history repeats itself in a vicious cycle.

The word radical as I learnt from the Browns and 'wearechange' comes from getting to the root of the problem. Be radical, find the truth like your life depends on it, most unnatural deaths occur because the truth was allowed to be lost, or donate your brain to the Tavistock Institue, let bombs go off at Tavistock Place as they did on 7/7 and allow those who still have a free mind and will to be assassinated by nameindex.
dave

Posted: Oct 29 2007, 11:58 PM

Link
I thought I had finished but couldn't sleep, there was an a gap in all these posts. If you are a victim of mind control, the problem is you may not know that you are and I try to help with this by explaining one of my own mistakes.

I remember in some research repeatedly seeing the issue of 'paedophiles in power'. This seemed totally alien to me, a wild conspiracy theory (I was programmed to think that) and despite the fact it kept coming up, I had no easy way to reason or fathom it.

Earlier I mentioned 'Child Protection' is a Tavistock favourite, it is a brain killer as Problem Reaction Solution are wrapped into one. We are pre-programmed as a primitive to care for children, so just the term Child Protection and it is seemingly instinctive to think child protection, oh yes, lets have as much of that as we can, we want to protect them. Our wish to do good then has the consequence we now see, destroying the lives of children and adults alike.

"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation." - Adolf Hitler

In the US in relation to the Internet, in 1996 the CDA (Communications Decency Act) was passed and in 1998 up popped COPA (Child Online Protection Act). I did say they never give up, they don't but the public did and these laws are now being passed in a frenzy.

I also alluded to a paedophile investigation in the UK, I include a quote from Tony Blair:
"I'm not so concerned about my permission for the Tavistock deaths, but if it gets out about my part in the Dunblane paedophile ring and consequential massacre, then my historical reputation is stuffed ... Do I really look like Prince Andrew?"
dave

Posted: Oct 30 2007, 12:12 AM

Link
If you come to an opinion on issues, such is the level of false information fed to the world and sheer overload of irrelevances, it is vital to question why you come to any opinion. Just because something is well known to be a fact, doesn't make it a fact.

If you react emotionally to an issue, however well intentioned you may be, the harm of your considered solution may actually be utterly devastating. For the right answers one needs the right questions and the truth, thereafter one can think, but such is human cognition whereby we don't notice our blind spots, free thinking includes the possibility that the answer we have may be wrong however obvious it seems. (One cannot join the dots unless one has them and knows what they are and for that we need all the dots each person has for we are all connected.)

Our own futures are often written in our heads, we act on our memories (history) in thinking and reacting, often without knowing even how those thoughts got there, often just as a product of automatic election whereby the more we have heard it the more we perceive it as true. (Although the mind has massive storage capacity, the access system is complex and re-enforcement allows fast recall).

It is a difficult task when so much in our heads is false, half true or irrelevant and we do not know which they are or what is missing.

I saw someone post recently here that they were one of the people that were "awake". Therapy for a problem often starts with admitting it and I openly state "I AM A VICTIM OF MIND CONTROL". (To such an extent I am still unable to perform an accurate damage assessment).
dave

Posted: Oct 30 2007, 12:33 AM

Link
I was 4 years old crawling round the house and I watched my mother scrubbing the kitchen floor. For some reason, I suddenly had awareness of myself, it was like a freeze frame on time, I could see myself on my knees at the doorway and my mother on her knees cleaning the floor. It seemed a moment in time of no significance in terms of external events but I was uniquely conscious of that moment. I said to myself I am going to remember this when I am seven and if I remember it when I am 7 I will remember it when I am 21 and if I remember it when I am 21 I will remember it for the rest of my life. That thought I trust, it didn't come from the television, a newspaper or anyone I could see. One thing in my head at least is worth something, it came at a moment in time when my mind was still, as for the rest, I am still trying to figure it out.

I leave that thought behind as I head for a second shot at sleep leaving as I go another quote, this time from a lady I had reason to write to not so long ago; the Queen of England: "Do we still own the press?"
dave

Posted: Oct 30 2007, 3:56 AM

Link
Truth is food for thought and I didn't sleep, so apologies, some more posting. We have here more bad law, dangerous and uttlerly insane. For some; Problem (George Bush), Reaction (nightmares are becoming reality) and solution (elect Ron Paul). Friendstacy described this as the good cop bad cop routine, I thought I would try put the issue to the test and as I am missing some facts I would want I construct a fictious set of circumstances for the test.

I think in the case of George Bush, major league drug dealing and murder are accurate allegations and enough for the purpose of the test. Instead of using Ron Paul in the test, I will take someone I believe who has demonstrated good spirit by deed. The caretaker on 9/11, at his own risk did his best to help other people during those apalling events, and right in the middle of being recognised for his work (or more accurately used for propaganda), he heard the questions being asked about 9/11, realised he was part of the puzzle and had questions of his own, and was dropped by the controlled media when he went public when he described the explosions he heard on the day.

By everything I have seen that caretaker was a genuine and fine fellow. Lets imagine he bumped his head, emerged a completely different person and next day he decided to go into major league drug dealing and murder on an unlimited scale. What would happen? I think it is fair to suggest after a certain number of drug deals or murders his new enterprise would be brought to a halt.

If the caretaker acts like George Bush, but the enterprise which threatens so many people is halted and this is not so for George Bush when they are both exhibiting the same behaviour, clearly it isn't George Bush that is the root of the problem, I suggest it is that pyramid that protects him.
Comments 1 - 20 of 26 Page of 2 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

10 Signs The U.S. is Becoming a Third World Country - 08/16SHOCK VIDEO: Alaska State Trooper Grabs at Citizen's Cell Phone Camera During Routine Traffic Stop! - 08/16Government Roid Rage Returns - 08/20Life for Half an Ounce of Medical Marijuana? - 08/12Video: NYPD Undercover Cop Threatens Cameraman with Rape - 08/19Video: Valedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling - 08/12California surfer films great white sharks circling his board - 08/12Murder a Kid, Plant a Gun -- Take a Vacation - 08/11

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human CivilizationValedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling in Graduation SpeechFeds Ignore Due Process, First Amendment, Shut Down 73,000 BlogsObama Administration Announces Massive Piracy CrackdownNew Bill Gives Obama 'Kill Switch' To Shut Down The InternetThe "Tax Mahal": A Shrine to Corporate SocialismBilderberg 2010: Between the sword and the wallObama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial
(more)

 
Top