informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...


An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand
Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"
The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future
(more)
Article posted Oct 17 2007, 1:16 PM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: WorldNetDaily Print

'Mom' and 'Dad' banished by California

Schwarzenegger signs law outlawing terms perceived as negative to 'gays'

"Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" effectively have been banned from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.

"We are shocked and appalled that the governor has blatantly attacked traditional family values in California," said Karen England, executive director of Capitol Resource Institute.

"With this decision, Gov. Schwarzenegger has told parents that their values are irrelevant. Many parents will have no choice but to pull their children out of the public schools that have now become sexualized indoctrination centers."

"Arnold Schwarzenegger has delivered young children into the hands of those who will introduce them to alternative sexual lifestyles," said Randy Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, which worked to defeat the plans. "This means children as young as five years old will be mentally molested in school classrooms.

"Shame on Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians for ensuring that every California school becomes a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual indoctrination center," he said.

Analysts have warned that schools across the nation will be impacted by the decision, since textbook publishers must cater to their largest purchaser, which often is California, and they will be unlikely to go to the expense of having a separate edition for other states.

The bills signed by Schwarzenegger include SB777, which bans anything in public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality, bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices.

There are no similar protections for students with traditional or conservative lifestyles and beliefs, however.

"SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with religious and traditional family values," said Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "These students have lost their voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger's unbelievable decision. The terms 'mom and dad' or 'husband and wife' could promote discrimination against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured.

"Parents want the assurance that when their children go to school they will learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic – not social indoctrination regarding alternative sexual lifestyles. Now that SB777 is law, schools will in fact become indoctrination centers for sexual experimentation," she said.

England told WND that the law is not a list of banned words, including "mom" and "dad." But she said the requirement is that the law bans discriminatory bias.

"Having 'mom' and 'dad' promotes a dicsriminatory bias. You have to either get rid of 'mom' and 'dad' or include everything when talking about [parental issues]," she said. "They [promoters of sexual alternative lifestyles] do consider that discriminatory."

Also signed was AB394, which targets parents and teachers for such indoctrination through "anti-harassment" training, CCF said.

Schwarzenegger had vetoed almost identical provisions a year ago, saying existing state law already provided for penalties for discrimination. "We had hoped that the governor would once again veto this outrageous legislation but he obviously decided to side with the out-of-touch extremists that control the legislature. This law does not reflect the true values of the average Californian," said England. "True leadership means standing up for what is true and right."

Thomasson said SB777 prohibits any "instruction" or school-sponsored "activity" that "promotes a discriminatory bias" against "gender" – the bill's definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes – as well as "sexual orientation."

"Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical effect of SB777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual lifestyles at every government-operated school," CCF noted.

Offenders will face the wrath of the state Department of Education, up to and including lawsuits.

CCF noted that now on a banned list will be any text, reference or teaching aid that portrays marriage as only between a man and woman, materials that say people are born male or female (and not in between), sources that fail to include a variety of transsexual, bisexual and homosexual historical figures, and sex education materials that fail to offer the option of sex changes.

Further, homecoming kings now can be either male or female – as can homecoming queens, and students, whether male or female, must be allowed to use the restroom and locker room corresponding to the sex with which they choose to identify.

AB394 promotes the same issues through state-funded publications, postings, curricula and handouts to students, parents and teachers.

It also creates the circumstances where a parent who says marriage is only for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be convicted of "harassment," and a student who believes people are born either male or female could be reported as a "harasser" by a male teacher who wears women's clothes, CCF said.

Thomasson said Schwarzenegger also signed AB14, which prohibits state funding for any program that does not support a range of alternative sexual practices, including state-funded social services run by churches.

Affected will be day cares, preschool or after-school programs, food and housing programs, senior services, anti-gang efforts, jobs programs and others.

Thomasson said it also forces every hospital in California – even private, religious hospitals – to adopt policies in support of transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality and opens up nonprofit organizations to lawsuits if they exclude members that engage in homosexual, bisexual, or transsexual conduct.

"It's the height of intolerance to punish individuals, organizations, businesses, and churches that have moral standards on sexual conduct and sexual lifestyles," said Thomasson, in response to the signing of AB14. "This is another insensitive law that violates people's moral boundaries."

The vitriol over the issue rose to new levels in its latest campaign.

As WND reported, a board member for the homosexual advocacy group Equality California verbally attacked and threatened CRI for its opposition to the bill earlier.

The board member sent an e-mail and video to CRI threatening the group would be buried if it continued efforts opposing the homosexual advocacy.

"The shocking hate mail we received shows that those behind this legislation do not promote true tolerance," said England. "Only politically correct speech will be tolerated. Those with religious or traditional moral beliefs will not be allowed to express their opinions in public schools."

She also cited an informational document published by the Gay-Straight Alliance Network and the Transgender Law Center that already is lobbying for special treatment in the school system.

"If you want to use a restroom that matches your gender identity … you should be allowed to do so," it advises. "Whenever students are divided up into boys and girls, you should be allowed to join the group or participate in the program that matches your gender identity as much as possible."

Further, the groups advise, "If you change your name to one that better matches your gender identity, a school needs to use that name to refer to you." The advocacy group also warns schools against bringing parents into any such discussion with students.

WND has documented a number of earlier cases in which educators, including leaders in California, have taken it upon themselves to promote a homosexual lifestyle to children under their charge.

WND reported California Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell, under whose supervision hundreds of thousands of children are being educated, has used his state position and taxpayer-funded stationery to praise a "gay" pride event used in the past to expose children to sexually explicit activities.

That drew vehement objections from several educators, including Priscilla Schreiber, the president of the Grossmont Unified High School District governing board.

"I am outraged that a person in this high-ranking elected position would advocate an event where diversity is not just being celebrated but where pornography and indecent exposure is being perpetrated on the young and innocent children of our communities," she said.


SHARE:



Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Video: As Usual, MSM Gushingly "Predicts" Our Fascist Future
- Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
- Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
- Philly Mayor Defends Tax on Bloggers
- 4th Amendment Violating Mobile X-Ray Scanners Hit The Streets
- Government: Secretly Watching Students Not a Crime
- TSA scares and violates child's personal space, X-rays her teddy bear
- Government Using Google Earth To Loot Destitute Americans









Comments 1 - 20 of 42 Add Comment Page of 3 >
friendstacy

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 4:49 PM

Link
wait a minnit... these "conservatives" want to be granted the right to be homophobes, if that's what their religion teaches them? I don't get it. That's like the KKK saying they deserve the right to hang people because of religious freedom.

you can't legislate tolerance, no matter how hard you try. Certain people are going to hate those who are different, because their own lives are defined by trying to be like everyone else. Making laws in such instances only gives fuel to the fire of hatred and bigotry, as evidenced by this article.

You wanna know what it's like to be a kid with a gay parent? It wasn't my dad who made life hell, it was the parents of the other kids. they wouldn't let their children play with me, not even talk to me, not at school or church or anywhere else. I didn't understand why. I remember later when I was either a junior or senior in high school, a boy in NewYork was beaten to death by his classmates after someone had seen his mom in a gay pride parade. I thought much had changed in the last twenty years. I guess it really hasn't.
friendstacy

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 5:02 PM

Link
"It's the height of intolerance to punish individuals, organizations, businesses, and churches that have moral standards on sexual conduct and sexual lifestyles," said Thomasson, in response to the signing of AB14. "This is another insensitive law that violates people's moral boundaries."

allow me to translate:
you the one intolerant. you won't let me hate people. my church tells me to hate them, so that makes it somehow okay.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 5:43 PM

Link
2463 >>>"We are shocked and appalled that the governor ---has blatantly attacked traditional family values--- in California," said Karen England, executive director of Capitol Resource Institute.<<<

Exactly. I read about the nwo needing to eliminate tradition values. Events like this make be believe it even more. Absolutely. NWO is no values, no moral, no traditions, no Nations, no philosophy, no anlything that gets in the way for the NWO.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 5:51 PM

Link
2463 friendstacy wrote "I don't get it."

Exactly. You are not suppose to get it, They just DO IT. What you are seeing is the New World Order marching ahead. Read "The Committee of 300," its all there. Whenever you see/hear/read something you don't get, rest assured thats the NWO's in action.

If you ask me the NWO is the world's unconscous let loose with little restraints.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 7:08 PM

Link
2463 Are we suppose to "get this?"

Ed Brown Gassed, Tortured In Deprivation Tank

Tax protester speaks for first time since arrest in prison phone call Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/171007_ed_brown.htm


Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 7:27 PM

Link
2463 ...or get this?

Man Tasered, Shot With Bean Bag Rounds For Filming Warrantless Police Search
http://infowars.net/articles/october2007/171007Filming.htm

Keep using that camera. The camera is mightier than the sword.
Camer users. Must read:

Filming in public is a right every American citizen has under the first and fourth amendments, there is no legal basis to seize cameras and footage.

In the past we have reported on cases in which police have seized cameras and film from innocent people under bogus charges of "wiretapping". Earlier this year a man was charged in Carlisle, Pennsylvania with filming police officers during a routine traffic stop and faces up to seven years in prison. Last year a North Middleton Twp. man was charged in a street racing case that involved a wiretapping charge. Police claimed the man ordered associates to tape police breaking up an illegal race after officers told him to turn off their cameras. Furthermore, last June a 48-year-old man from Dover, New Hampshire was arrested for "wiretapping" for allegedly recording police while they were investigating him for driving while intoxicated.

Such charges are invalid because they flout privacy laws. Under the fourth amendment the expectation of privacy is not reasonable at such public places as automobile thoroughfares.

Furthermore, the expectation of privacy is not reasonable if there exists a vantage point from which anyone, not just a police officer, can see or hear what is going on.

Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 7:54 PM

Link
2463 By The Way.
It is said the ruling Elite (the movers and shakers of the NWO) want power.

I go one better than that and perhaps the ultimate motive. I saw a movie I think it was "Chinatown." At the end the inspector asked the rich owner, "You have everything. You don't need more. What is it then that you want???" And he answered, "The future."

I just happened to see an Ad reading "Protect your future with gold."
What do they want? Power or the future? Maybe both. After all whats a future without power. Or power without a future.
dave

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 8:37 PM

Link
The illuminati objectives include global destruction, living hell for some. That part of the objective is a logical weakness once fully embraced. Many people don't speak out to protect their jobs, their lives and their families when the effect of that is quite likely suicidal.

Some will want to go on working regardless, only ensuring that the collapse of the economy, of food supply and other life supports and the deployment of munitions against them is all the more brutal and organised.

I think the equation is quite simple. Many people find politics and big power plays boring, frankly I do, but politics and big power play is interested in people so if too many people bury their heads in the sand for too long they might well be stuck there.
dave

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 9:00 PM

Link
For that reason and others, it is quite a good time not to be distracted by talk of elections, distracted by people who have the right words, distracted by differences be they politics, religion, nationhood, title or any divide.

It is rather a stupid position really, the entire planet is enslaved by a group of people who would have plenty of play space if they were moved to the Falkland Islands. Instead people are working away to pay those that wish to destroy them build their tunnels where they can leggit when the going gets tough.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2007, 10:32 PM

Link
2463 Dave
Posted: Oct 17 2007, 8:37 PM

>>>>The illuminati objectives include global destruction, living hell for some. That part of the objective is a logical weakness <<<<

That part I don't understand (like friendstacy said "I don't get it."
If its a logical weakness, then why do they persue this course of action? They got a death wish? Destruction for Destruction's sake?
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:16 AM

Link
The question you ask 24 is one I am still looking to answer. The fact that I have so far failed to reason it helps explain why it has been so effective, how it has gone on so long and why today people would struggle to believe it exists.

For quite some time I looked at the ultimate target being power, for me that again is logically flawed. Of all the forces in the world, I have yet to see anything that can compete with love. Power is something that destroys itself. If I was a soldier, power is finite, I can only have so many bullets. Love I have never run out of, I don't think I could. For some love will sound foolish, naive or weak, I don't think so at all. If we all built our lives from what we could take from other people, we would all end up bankrupt.

To put something to try to help with your question 24, I put something that is from one of the illuminati meetings.
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:20 AM

Link
1. The speaker started to unfold the plot by saying that because the majority of men were inclined to evil rather than to good the best results in governing them could be obtained by using violence and terrorism and not by academic discussions. The speaker reasoned that in the beginning human society had been subject to brutal and blind force which was afterwards changed to LAW. He argued that LAW was FORCE only in disguise. He reasoned it was logical to conclude that "By the laws of nature right lies in force."

2. He next asserted that political freedom is an idea and not a fact. He stated that in order to usurp political power all that was necessary was to preach `Liberalism' so that the electorate, for the sake of an idea, would yield some of their power and prerogatives which the plotters could then gather together into their own hands.

3. The speaker asserted that the Power of Gold had usurped the power of liberal rulers even then, i.e. 1773. He reminded his audience that there had been a time when FAITH had ruled but stated that once FREEDOM had been substituted for FAITH the people did not know how to use it in moderation. He argued that because of this fact it was logical to assume that they could use the idea of FREEDOM to bring about "CLASS WARS." He pointed out that it was immaterial to the success of HIS plan whether the established governments were destroyed by internal or external foes because the victor had of necessity to seek the aid of `Capital' which "Is entirely in our hands." **

4. He argued that the use of any and all means to reach their final goal was justified on the grounds that the ruler who governed by the moral code was not a skilled politician because he left himself vulnerable and in an unstable position on his throne. He said "Those who wish to rule must have recourse to cunning and to make-believe because great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics:"***

5. He asserted "Our right lies in force. The word RIGHT is an abstract thought and proves nothing. I find a new RIGHT ... to attack by the RIGHT of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all existing institutions, and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the RIGHTS to their powers by laying them down voluntarily in their 'Liberalism.'"

dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:20 AM

Link
6. He then admonished his listeners with these words "The power of our resources must remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it:" He warned them that any deviation from the Line of the strategical plan he was making known to them would risk bringing to naught "THE LABOURS OF CENTURIES."

7. He neat advocated the use of `Mob Psychology' to obtain control of the masses. He reasoned that the might of the Mob is blind, senseless, and unreasoning and ever at the mercy of suggestion from any side. He stated "Only a despotic ruler can rule the Mob efficiently because without absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which was carried out NOT by the masses, but by their guide, who-so-ever that person might be." He warned "The moment the Mob seizes FREEDOM in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy."

8. He next advocated that the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption, and all forma of vice, be used systematically by their "Agenturs"* to corrupt the morals of the youth of the nations. He recommended that the special `agenturs' should be trained as tutors, lackeys, governesses, clerks and by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the Goyim.** He added "In the number of these last I count also the so-called society ladies who become voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury. We must not stop at bribery, deceit, and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end."

9. Turning to politics he claimed they had the RIGHT to seize property by any means, and without hesitation, if by doing so they secured submission, and sovereignty. He pronounced "Our STATE marching along the path of peaceful conquest has the RIGHT to replace the horrors of wars by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death necessary to maintain the `terror' which tends to produce blind submission."

10. Dealing with the use of slogans he said "In ancient limes we were the first to put the words 'Liberty,' 'Equality' and `Fraternity' into the mouths of the masses ... words repeated to this day by stupid poll - parrots; words which the would-be wise men of the Goyim could make nothing of in their abstractness, and did not note the contradiction of their meaning and inter-relation." He claimed the words brought under their directions and control 'legions' "Who bore our banners with enthusiasm:" He reasoned that there is no place in nature for `Equality.' 'Liberty' or `Fraternity.' He said "On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of MONEY. The qualification for this aristocracy is WEALTH which is dependent upon us."
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:21 AM

Link
11. He next expounded his theories regarding war. In 1773 he set down a principle which the governments of Britain and the United States publicly announced as their joint policy in 1939. He said it

should be the policy of those present to foment wars but to direct the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants obtained territorial gains. He said the wars should be directed so that the nations engaged on both sides would be placed further in their debt, and in the power of `Our' Agenturs.

12. He next dealt with administration. He told those present that they must use their wealth to have candidates chosen for public office who would be "servile and obedient to our commands, so they may readily be used as Pawns in our game by the learned and ingenious men we will appoint to operate behind the scenes of government as official advisers." He added "The men we appoint as `Advisers' will have been bred, reared, and trained from childhood in accordance with our ideas to rule the affairs of the whole world."

13. He dealt with propaganda, and explained how their combined wealth could control all outlets of public information while they remained in the shade and clear of blame regardless of what the repercussions might be due to the publication of libels, slanders, or untruths. The speaker said: "Thanks to the Press we have got gold in our hands notwithstanding the fact that we had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears... But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim."

14. He next explained the necessity of having their `Agentur' always come out into the open, and appear on the scene, when conditions had reached their lowest ebb, and the masses had been subjugated by means of want and terror. He pointed out that when it was time to restore order they should do it in such a way that the victims would believe they had been the prey of criminals and irresponsibles. He said "By executing the criminals and lunatics after they have carried out our preconceived 'reign of terror.' we can make ourselves appear as the saviours of the oppressed, and the champions of the workers." The speaker then added "We are interested in just the opposite.., in the diminution, the killing out of the Goytim:"

15. He next explained how industrial depressions and financial panics could be brought about and used to serve their purpose saying "Enforced unemployment and hunger, imposed on the masses because of the power we have to create shortages of food, will create the right of Capital to rule more surely than it was given to the real aristocracy, and by the legal authority of Kings." He claimed that by having their agentur control the 'Mob,' the `Mob' could then be used to wipe out all who dared to stand in their way.
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:22 AM

Link
16. The infiltration into continental Freemasonry was neat discussed extensively. The speaker stated that their purpose would be to take advantage of the facilities and secrecy Freemasonry had to offer. He pointed out that they could organize their own Grand Orient Lodges within Blue Freemasonry in order to carry on their subversive activities and hide the true nature of their work under the cloak of philanthropy. He stated that all members initiated into their Grand Orient Lodges should be used for proselytizing purposes and for spreading their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the Goyim. He ended this phase of the discussion with the words, "When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way."

17. He nest expounded the value of systematic deceptions, pointing out that their agentur should be trained in the use of high sounding phrases, and the use of popular slogans. They should make the masses the most lavish of promises. He observed "The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards... that is of no consequence:" He reasoned that by using such words as Freedom and Liberty, the Goyim could be stirred up to such a pitch of patriotic fervour that they could be made to fight even against the laws of God, and Nature. He added "And for this reason after we obtain control the very NAME OF GOD will be erased from the 'Lexicon of life.'"

18. He then detailed the plans for revolutionary war; the art of street fighting; and outlined the pattern for the `Reign of Terror' which he insisted must accompany every revolutionary effort "Because it is the most economical way to bring the population to speedy subjection."

19. Diplomacy was neat discussed. After all wars secret diplomacy must be insisted upon "in order that our agentur, masquerading as `political,' 'Financial,' and 'Economic' advisers, can carry out our mandates without fear of exposing who are `The Secret Power behind national and international affairs." The speaker then told those present that by secret diplomacy they must obtain such control "that the nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secret agents having a hand in it:"

20. Ultimate World Government the goal. To reach this goal the speaker told them "It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of such colossal riches, that even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments ON THE DAY AFTER THE GREAT POLITICAL SMASH." The speaker then added "You gentlemen here present who are economists just strike an estimate of the significance of this combination:"
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:23 AM

Link
21. Economic war. Plans to rob the Goyim of their landed properties and industries were then discussed. A combination of high taxes and unfair competition was advocated to bring about the economic ruin of the Goyim as far as their national financial interests and investments were concerned. In the international field he felt they could be encouraged to price themselves out of the markets. This could be achieved by the careful control of raw materials, organized agitation amongst the workers for shorter hours and higher pay, and by subsidizing competitors. The speaker warned his co-conspirators that they must arrange matters, and control conditions, so that "the increased wages obtained by the workers will not benefit them in any way:"

22. Armaments. It was suggested that the building up of armaments for the purpose of making the Goyim destroy each other should be launched on such a colossal scale that in the final analysis "there will only be the masses of the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause... and police, and soldiers sufficient to protect our interests:"

23. The New Order. The members of the One World Government
would be appointed by the Dictator. He would pick men from amongst the scientists, the economists, the financiers, the industrialists, and from the millionaires because "in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures."

24. Importance of youth. The importance of capturing the interest of youth was emphasized with the admonition that "Our agenturs should infiltrate into all classes, and levels of society and government, for the purpose of fooling, bemusing, and corrupting the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false."

25. National and International Laws should not be changed but should be used as they are, to destroy the civilization of the Goyim "merely by twisting them into a contradiction of the interpretation which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Our ultimate aim is to substitute ARBITRATION for LAW."
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:24 AM

Link
The speaker then told his listeners "You may think the Goyim will rise upon us with, arms, but in the WEST we have against this possibility an organization of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail ... the `Underground'. . , The Metropolitans ... The subterranean corridors... these will be established in the capitals and cities of all countries before that danger threatens."

The use of the word 'WEST' has great significance. It makes it plain that Rothschild was addressing men who had joined the World Revolutionary Movement which was started in the Pale of Settlement in the `EAST.' It must be remembered that before Amschel Moses Bauer settled down in Frankfort, Germany, he had followed his trade as a gold and silversmith, travelling extensively in the `East' of Europe, where he had undoubtedly met the men his son Amschel Mayer addressed after he developed from a money-lender into a banker and established THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD in the Judenstrasse where the above meeting is said to have taken place in 1773.

As far as can be ascertained the original plan of the conspiracy ended at the point where it terminated above. I am satisfied that the documents which fell into the hands of Professor S. Nilus in 1901, and which he published under the title `The Jewish Peril' in 1905 in Russia, were an enlargement of the original plot. There appears to be no change in the first section but various additions disclose how the conspirators had used Darwinism, Marxism, and even Nietzche-ism. More important still, the documents discovered in 1901 disclose how Zionism was to be used. It must be remembered that Zionism was only organized in 1897.
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:30 AM

Link
One cannot presume that someone in a meeting discloses true purpose when such people use others for their own ends. The above was extracted from Pawns in the Game by William Carr. A lecture which appears to follow the same theme is on the net.

http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-one.mp3
http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-two.mp3
http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-three.mp3
http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-four.mp3
http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-five.mp3
http://www.apfn.org/audio/fagan-six.mp3
friendstacy

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:40 AM

Link
what most people are calling "traditional family values" has nothing to do with what I believe morality is all about. Morality is about looking within your own heart for the answers to questions of right and wrong. It's not about following the fastest-talking preacher man or the slickest politician, no matter how pretty their words are. Funny thing about this inner morality, once you recognize that good and bad are moral judgments we make about things, we recognize the right of everyone else to look within for their own answers. It's all about the golden rule. treat other people the way you deserve to be treated. simple as that. These Bible-thumpers spouting off about "family values" have no moral authority over anyone else, same with legislators. People!! Come on!! It's up to each one of us to decide for ourselves what acts are moral, and then act upon whatever our conscience tells us is right. It's not up to anyone to decide for anyone else what is morally right or wrong.

I have a moral obligation to do what I know is right. It doesn't matter what any authority might be telling me to do, if my conscience does not agree. I recognize, it's undeniable that any act that hurts anyone, anywhere, also hurts myself.

and to take this back on topic, laws that separate one group from another are carefully designed to cause friction between the groups. That can be the only purpose of such legislation, to increase the tension and hatred, to prevent the people from getting along. Keep us fighting each other so we won't rise up against the real enemy of the people, the State.
dave

Posted: Oct 18 2007, 10:40 AM

Link
Much of this is visible now as are many of the illuminati. Despite their unwilting demonstration of might, their power, for all the havock it can create cannot endure, it is logically inconsistant.

In terms of that havock, there is much we can do to limit the casualty. In the UK for example, clearly the illuminati are out to destroy local means of food production, the economy, all freedoms whilst provoking hatred, civil unrest and violence.

People will not be so distracted, diverted and foolish if they can see these things being done and the true purpose behind them. Whatever it is it is a religion unto its own right, it is illuminism, and whether one looks at it as totallitarian, satanic or simply deranged, it should be exposed as far as possible that people are independantly empowered with free choice.
Comments 1 - 20 of 42 Page of 3 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

10 Signs The U.S. is Becoming a Third World Country - 08/16SHOCK VIDEO: Alaska State Trooper Grabs at Citizen's Cell Phone Camera During Routine Traffic Stop! - 08/16Government Roid Rage Returns - 08/20Life for Half an Ounce of Medical Marijuana? - 08/12Video: NYPD Undercover Cop Threatens Cameraman with Rape - 08/19Video: Valedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling - 08/12California surfer films great white sharks circling his board - 08/12Murder a Kid, Plant a Gun -- Take a Vacation - 08/11

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human CivilizationValedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling in Graduation SpeechFeds Ignore Due Process, First Amendment, Shut Down 73,000 BlogsObama Administration Announces Massive Piracy CrackdownNew Bill Gives Obama 'Kill Switch' To Shut Down The InternetThe "Tax Mahal": A Shrine to Corporate SocialismBilderberg 2010: Between the sword and the wallObama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial
(more)

 
Top