The news you're not supposed to know...

Multimedia

An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off

The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires

The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand

Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"

The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future (more)

Article posted Jul 18 2007, 8:59 AM

Category: Science/Technology

Source: Marcus Karr

Open Letter To Climate and/or Atmosphere Scientists

Marcus Karr

Dear Climate and/or Atmosphere Scientist,

The heated debate on global warming seems to be cooling down, as, after a review of the relevant factors - including 'increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases'; 'global changes to land surface, such as deforestation' and urban heat islands; 'increasing atmospheric concentrations of aerosols' (1); and even some ideas that seem to be out in space, such as cosmic rays and variations in sun activity (2) - a consensus seems to have been reached that increased carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions are the primary determining factor (3). It is the opinion of this author that such a consensus is premature, owing to the fact that not all the evidence has been submitted.

Certain advanced nations have been purposefully tampering with the atmosphere for some time now. Half a century ago their method of choice was the use of atomic weapons (4), but since then their arsenal has grown in sophistication to include the 'injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams'. In a 1996 US Air Force review of the subject, it was emphasized that 'many techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated experimentally' (5).

The abstract from the proceedings of a 1990 conference held on 'Ionospheric Modification and Its Potential to Enhance or Degrade the Performance of Military Systems' noted lamentably that 'interest in the [upper atmosphere] has been focused on identifying and quantifying the limitations it imposes on [military] systems, rather than on ways it might be altered, or controlled' (ed.: all italics in this paper are mine). Nevertheless, the authors go on to say that 'A variety of [atmospheric] modification techniques are being investigated, both ground- and space-based, to increase or decrease existing ionization or to create independent artificial plasmas. These techniques include high power radio waves, lasers, particle beams, and chemical releases' (6).

The Air Force review mentioned above referred to such 'independent artificial plasmas' as the 'creation of an artificial ionosphere'. One of the papers submitted to the 1990 conference - focusing on 'Theoretical and experimental research on the creation, maintenance, and control of artificial layers of ionization in the 50 to 90 km altitude range' - discusses the use of 'artificial ionospheric mirrors' (AIM) in terms of 'a specific technical approach, the use of ground-based, very high power, RF waves to breakdown the atmosphere' (7).

We find one stated purpose for creating an artificial ionosphere in the patent for artificial ionospheric mirrors (8), which reads:

In the past, the technique of using the ionosphere as a mirror to reflect radio waves, or RF energy, has given Ham Radio operators the ability to send transmissions over long distances. This technique has also provided radar systems the ability to look 'over the horizon'. Variations and fluctuations in the ionosphere, however, can render the effectiveness of such communications uncertain. Thus, the desirability of creating controllable plasma layers in the atmosphere...has been recognized.

The patent outlines quite clearly the means by which artificial ionospheres are created:

3. An apparatus for generating an AIM comprising:

(a) a phased array heater antenna which is focused at an altitude to cause an avalanche ionization area to be created in the atmosphere

There are not many 'phased array heater antennas' in the world, and those few have attracted some controversy - perhaps you know which I am talking about - so I am not going mention them here by name.

If you remember from the Air Force review I quoted above, atmospheric modification has been achieved by means of 'injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams'. I have said a word about 'heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation', and now I would like to briefly mention the purposeful 'injection of chemical vapors'.

A 1990 Stanford University paper entitled 'Overview of Ionospheric Modification from Space Platforms' discusses 'non-electromagnetic methods of modifying...the terrestrial ionosphere' (9). The abstract goes on:

Of these [methods], the most well-understood is the direct injection of chemical vapors into the ambient medium. ... Modification to the ionosphere can last for up to hours from [barium] injections. Other vapors have also been released, including water vapor, SF 6 and more noxious gases, in successful efforts to alter the chemistry of the ionosphere.

In addition to the Stanford paper, a 1979 University of Alaska study entitled 'Chemical releases in the ionosphere' reported that 'Development of the thermite barium release technique enabled observation of both neutral and ion motions, the latter leading rather directly to determination of ionospheric electric fields' (10).

At this point the skeptic inside you might object that these releases were made into the upper reaches of the atmosphere, in near space, where, it seems, there is not much effect on the climate-determining processes of the lower atmosphere. However, given the existence of an artificial ionosphere in the 50 km to 90 km altitude range, it appears likely that barium and other chemical releases should be made rather closer to home, for the purposes of 'altering the chemistry' and 'determining the electric fields' of said artificial ionosphere.

Finally I would like to pose some obvious questions, which I am not qualified to answer but on which perhaps you may be able to shed some light.

1. What is the effect of an artificial ionosphere on climate and the weather?

2. What is the effect of deliberate chemical releases of barium 'and more noxious gases' into the atmosphere, on climate and the weather?

3. What is the effect of 'electromagnetic radiation and particle beams', on climate and the weather?

4. Are said effects likely to be negligible - that is, unworthy of study - in the study of climate and the weather?

5. If said effects are in fact not negligible, then why have these factors not been scrutinized or addressed?

Regards,

Marcus Karr

Concerned citizen of the United States

---

Works Cited

1. Attribution of Recent Climate Change

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_of_recent_climate_change

2. Khabibullo Ismailovich Abdusamatov

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khabibullo_Ismailovich_Abdusamatov

3. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

4. Operation Argus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Argus

Starfish Prime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Starfish

5. Concept of Operations, from Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025; United States Air Force, 1996

http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-4.htm

6. Conference Proceedings on Ionospheric Modification and Its Potential to Enhance or Degrade the Performance of Military Systems Held in Bergen, Norway on 28-31 May 1990; Advisory Group For Aerospace Research And Development Neuilly-Sur-Seine (France)

http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA239823

7. Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors (AIM). A: Concept and issues; Kossey, Paul A., et. al; AGARD, Ionospheric Modification and its Potential to Enhance or Degrade the Performance of Military Systems pg. 11; 1990

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990imip.agarS....K

8. Patent No. 5041834, issued 1991

http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT5041834

9. Overview of Ionospheric Modification from Space Platforms; Banks, Peter; 1990

http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP006512

10. Chemical Releases in the Ionosphere; Davis T N; Rep. Prog. Phys.; 1979

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0034-4885/42/9/003

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Science/Technology
- Video: How Technological Advancements Are Changing the World
- Fix Traffic Problems: Get Rid of Lights and Signs
- California surfer films great white sharks circling his board
- Hey NY Times: Can You Back Up The Claim Of $200 Billion Lost To Counterfeiting?
- Left-wing Env. Scientist Bails Out Of Global Warming Movement: Declares it a 'corrupt social phenomenon...strictly an imaginary problem of the 1st World middleclass'
- Global Warming Scam: 2010 is Not the Hottest Year
- Don't mess with Monckton
- Amazongate: why it matters

Comments 1 - 5 of 5

Add Comment

Page 1 of 1

globalstomp

Posted: Jul 18 2007, 10:36 PM

Link

This article barely scratches the surface and is in no way new news. For a more complete outlook go to www.earthpulse.com/haarp/ This is the site of Dr. Nick Begich that wrote the book "angles don't play that haarp". Where he explains the dangerous possibilities of the government controlling the weather and using this microwave weapon on the populace or enemy governments. Nick Begich was one of the original designers that came forward to write his book because he was being mislead as to what capacity the military was using this weather modification station and for what means to what ends and the fact it wasn't just for weather modification but that it had serious military applications as well.

They can literally zap a person or group or an army from space using a triangulation of satellites or they can divert weather patterns to move in any direction they choose. If a country was not going along with our plans for instance, then they could cause a drought or any weather catastrophe to attack them. Katrina for instance, could have been diverted but they let it hit knowing full well the consequences and some have said they actually steered it into the New Orleans area. This has been detailed from satellite imagery showing how unnaturally the hurricane had tracked into the area.

Sky-holes as they are called by some, are not a natural weather phenomena but is actually HAARP heating the ionosphere and leaving a hole where the microwave beam was concentrated much like heating a foggy window with your car heater with the clear spot growing until the window is clear.

The Airforce actually started their weather modification program back in the sixties and were given the technology from a Russian scientist who defected to this country during the cold war.
Remember, if the government says they are looking into something it means they already have it and are currently using it. Public disclosure is just a way to cover their asses after everything is in place so they can complete their goals before anyone can say anything about it.

Out of this WM technology the Airforce has expanded their efforts to include chem-trails where viruses and bacteria are put in the spray along with such toxins as barium, aluminum and mercury which can cross the blood brain barrier causing irreparable harm to the brains of the victims and may be the real cause of the alarming rate of Alzheimer's in the elderly. All this is disguised as weather modification. In fact every human in the US has about six times the normal amount of aluminum in their blood stream and is found to be in very high concentrations of Alzheimer's patients. We should all stop drinking and eating from aluminum including aluminum cookware and beer cans because you are consuming little bits of aluminum everytime you use it.

The chem-trail spraying is just one part of the bigger eugenics program which was started before WWII and funded by the Rockefellers which was then given to Hitler for his extermination of the Jews in the Nazi death camps.

This experimentation of the general public is also authorized in our own US code, "US code article 50 chapter 32" where I summarize, "the military can experiment on the general public without their knowledge using biologicals and other chemicals such as nerve gases, chemicals, and cancer viruses". Don't believe me? Look it up on a Google search. US code article 50 chapter 32. while your there also google "quiet wars silent weapons" this is another aspect of human conditioning, eugenics and mind control.

Except for a brief warning issued to local officials to clear out because they are spraying a certain area, the public is not supposed to know about this nor are they required to tell the public. The very debilitating Morgellons disease is now being linked to this aerial spraying as well with so much real evidence to prove it, This shows that the government has been spraying and experimenting on the general public for at least the last fifty years and this can be found in the governments own declassified documents.

From all this spraying comes sickness and cancer rates that are through the roof and the actual life expectancy is being shortened for humans to correlate with the ongoing eugenics program. Their goal is to exterminate 80% of the world population.

Bottom line is everything the government is doing is designed to cull the population with, war, medicine and dentistry, cigarettes, drugs, alcohol, viruses, disease, bacteria, chemical, fluoride in the water, processed food additives, GMO and radioactive sterilization of foods, and even the air we breathe is now so tainted the eugenicist are unwittingly even poisoning themselves and doing the planet irreversible harm. It is well known among independant scientist that DU weapons used in the middle east and other nukes being tested around the globe, that the whole planet is breathing an altered and dangerous atmosphere that will eventually kill us.

Where does this all come from? It comes from generations of planning from your good friends at the new world order, the globalist...........................

David Stanley

Posted: Jul 19 2007, 10:15 AM

Link

83193

haarp is a particularly ugly multimode weapon, being able to use the planet itself as a weapon decidedly unpleasant.

It is not one of the secrets that can be hidden as radio hams can monitor the transmissions. It would be quite a useful civil defence measure for people to get their amateur licences to be able to communicate in the event other means became unnavailable.

David Stanley

Posted: Jul 19 2007, 1:13 PM

Link

83193

I used to think the tsunami was too extreme to be a man made event and gave it scant regard. I am increasingly less inclined to believe so, indeed, the more I look at it the more trouble I have with believing this could have been an earthquake at all. With censored reports of radiation sickness, whistleblowers from intelligence agencies and blatant deception by the media, I think public scrutiny should be applied to try and determine what did and didn't happen.

People often talk about what is coming, what has already happened helps determine exactly that.

"Despite a natural human tendency to be shocked into silence by the sheer number of dead and injured across Asia on 26 December 2004, and despite also being slightly fearful of losing personal credibility because of the magnitude of the apparent crime, there are many provable irregularities in the official American tsunami story that simply have to be recorded now, or forever be lost in the sands of time."
http://www.vialls.com/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami.html

Anonymous

Posted: Jul 22 2007, 9:46 PM

Link

70243

Dear Mr. Marcus Karr and informationliberation.com,

In my opinion you should try sending this letter to, or posting it on, the Realclimate weblog at www.realclimate.org . The Realclimate blog is run by a group of climate scientists, and they seem to occasionally answer questions and clear up issues regarding climatology and global warming. Since they, and others posting there, often answer questions, they might have answers for this. I can't guarantee this, since most people there denying climate change are probably fervent Bush-supporter types who tend to repeat the same things over and over, and this also might be dismissed as "conspiracy theory" type material which unfortunately happens when people question the government.

That being said, they do regularly answer concerns and objections about climate change that are considered out of the mainstream and clarify issues like this quite a lot. This blog in particular is noteworthy both because the people running it are both actual climate scientists knowledgeable on this, and also are willing to interact with readers on their blog, so your letter obvously would have a better chance being addressd than, say, sending to the IPCC or national academy of sciencs. Especially given the respectful tone of your letter this might be worth a try, to have your questions answered from a perspective of a professional climatlogist.

Ethan

Posted: Jan 13 2008, 1:43 PM

Link

7057

HARRP is not what you have to worry about, these are scientific transmitters and the scientists who research with these are not trying to kill you. In fact the real danger comes from AM broadcast, because it blankets the entire globe and uses 1.45MHz aka. gyro frequency which stimulates cyclotron plasma waves in the E & F regions of the ionosphere. This in turn causes electron precipitation and ion outflow in the polar regions which reacts with local Nitrogen to form NO2. As you may know NO2 is one of the primary regulators of ozone. In fact if you look at the global temperature anomalies since 1909 you will see a connection. In 1917-1920 nearly all AM was shut down, during this time you can see a flat line on a graph from WMO. When television came on in 1946/47 the largest shift in man made radio wave propagation occured, during this time the worst winter on record occurred. This is because television operates at a frequency that supresses the electron precipitation -ozone depletion process. This can be seen in experiments done by HARRP. In 1973 FM over took AM allowing the process to continue, thus our current rise in global temperature. Swedish Institute for Space Physics and other tmospheric scientists have noticed that global broadcast may have a profound impact on the environment, in fact some of these transmitters were built to explore this concern, but due to faulty exuiptment, scientific hiccups and the fact that the reality of this would upset careers it is not considered very much. I could go on for hours at length, because to my knowledge I'm one of the leading researchers on this topic. I am in contact with a few scientists who get this process and will be launching a campaign this year or next, so keep an eye out and spread the word, no more of this conspiracy stuff, it clouds a very serious issue. Here is an example:

At VLF frequencies between 10 and 20 kHz, the ground-based transmitters are used for radio-navigation and communications. Their ionospheric perturbations include: the triggering of new waves, ionospheric heating, wave-electron interactions, and particle precipitation. At HF frequencies, the broadcasting stations utilise powerful transmitters which can heat the ionosphere and change the temperature and the density. All these wave dissipations in the ionosphere could participate to the global warming of the Earth because the change in global temperature increases the number of natural lightning discharges in the atmosphere. Then the supplementary lightning discharges produce more magnetospheric whistlers which could produce heating and ionization in the lower ionosphere.
Furthermore, it is a feedback mechanism because two different processes could be involved. First, lightning is a source of NOx, and NOx affects the concentration of ozone in the atmosphere which contributes to the greenhouse effect. Second, precipitation of energetic electrons by man?made waves may trigger other lightning discharges. It explains the importance of the study of such man-made waves [7]. Ionospheric perturbations by natural geophysical activities have been made evident by two methods: the study of the electromagnetic waves, and the measurement of the electron density.

http://www.lpce.cnrs-orleans.fr/www_experim/experim_espace_demeter_details_eng.php

Your on the right track though so keep it up.

With great kindness, Ethan

Broadcast Climate Change Theory : A Revolutionary Perspective on Climate Change

Comments 1 - 5 of 5

Page 1 of 1

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill