Popular Mechanics: "The attacks if (sic) 9/11 is what caused WTC 7 to collapse"Chris | InformationLiberation
Apr. 01, 2007
FBI Director Chris Wray Plays Victim After Trump Raid: Threats Against The FBI Are 'Deplorable And Dangerous'
Attorney General Merrick Garland Admits He 'Personally Approved' Trump Raid, Plays Victim
Politico: Epstein-Linked Judge Who Signed Off On Trump Raid is Victim of 'Antisemitic Attacks'
Ukraine Defense Ministry Threatens to Bomb Russian Civilians in Crimea
FBI/DOJ Leaker Tells WashPo Trump Raid May Have Been For Super-Secret Nuclear Documents 'And Other Items'
In one of the most pathetic hit pieces in ages, Inside Edition has thrown together an unbelievably horrible piece of propaganda in an attempt to trash Rosie and 9/11 Truthers. The Orwellian doublethink one would have to exhibit to believe this trash is surreal:
James Meigs, editor in chief of "Popular Mechanics," ... said as much as 25% of the building was scooped out by the falling debris. He added, "There were intense fires that burned inside the building that weakend the steel frame. Rosie O'Donnell said this was the first time in history fire melted steel, but fire doesn't have to melt steel to weaken it enough to fail."
Building 7's symmetrical "failing" in 6.5 seconds due to fire.
To qualm you nutty conspiracy theorists who think that a building "weakened" by fire would not symmetrically collapse in 6.5 seconds, the "Inside Edition" continues with its "expert," "scientific," analysis:
The building is seen falling in on itself, and it seems to follow the classic pattern of a controlled demolition.You see foolish theorists, the one factor you forgot was the "attacks if 9/11"! The "attacks if 9/11" is what caused WTC 7 to collapse! It had nothing to do with those "mysterious things" called bombs (You know the things which go *BOOM* and are used to demolish buildings? You probably don't, they're very mysterious).
So there you have it, the "attacks if 9/11" is what caused the collapse, thank you Inside Edition and Popular Mechanics for enlightening us all.
And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed - if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. 'Reality control', they called it: in Newspeak, 'doublethink.'