Election Could Have Been Thrown, Says Fraud Expert

Harris considers token victory for Democrats fixed to quell dissent on mass voting fraud, liberal bloggers begin to attack anyone who doesn't jump on the Pelosi bandwagon
By Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Nov. 09, 2006

Voting rights activist Bev Harris fears the mid-term elections may have been thrown in order to quell suspicions about vote fraud in anticipation of a major 2008 coup. Liberal blog sites are already naively telling whistleblowers and "conspiracy theorists" to keep quiet now that the left arm of the establishment, the Democrats, have re-emerged.

"I think it's gonna be interesting to see which election reform groups decide that it's not such a bad problem after all now that they have Democrats in there because I think that some of them are actually closet partisans," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"The issue here is not change in the last 24 hours - voting machines can't be authenticated, they're not necessarily accurate, they're tamper friendly - nothing has changed about that in 24 hours."

"We shouldn't really try to say well some Democrats are in there so now it's OK - it's not."

However, that's exactly what a lot of left-leaning establishment types are parroting, claiming a Democrat victory proves "American democracy still works," and that questions about electronic voting machines should be tossed aside.

Glenn Greenwald, an attorney and highly regarded liberal blogger, today went on the attack against those who many in the establishment left had previously allied with in order to take on the Neo-Cons.

"Chronic defeatists and conspiracy theorists — well-intentioned though they may be — need to re-evaluate their defeatism and conspiracy theories in light of this rather compelling evidence which undermines them," states Greenwald, "Republicans don't possess the power to dictate the outcome of elections with secret Diebold software. They can't magically produce Osama bin Laden the day before the election."

Greenwald's naivety is rivaled only by his arrogance and we are already beginning to have flashbacks to the Bill Clinton era, when liberals associated their authority with the Democrats and defended their every action without recourse.

Greenwald seems to have had a memory bypass that prevents him recalling anything from over two years ago. The fact is that the Republicans did produce Osama bin Laden before the 2004 election and Republicans have been caught engaging on vote fraud across the board, including via Diebold systems. Diebold's own Chief Executive, Walden O'Dell, committed himself to "helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president," before the 2004 election.

Ludicrously, Greenwald claims that six years of repeated Bush administration assaults on the Constitution, imperial jaunts that have killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of innocents, the degradation of how America is viewed abroad, and the very integrity of the country, has all been reversed by the empowerment of a party rhetorically led by Nancy Pelosi, a pro-torture, pro-war, mobbed-up establishment sycophant who has already agreed to protect Bush and his cronies from criminal investigations.

"All of the hurdles and problems that are unquestionably present and serious — a dysfunctional and corrupt national media, apathy on the part of Americans, the potent use of propaganda by the Bush administration, voter suppression and election fraud tactics, gerrymandering and fundraising games — can all be overcome. They just were," smarts Greenwald.

Harris encouraged people to take a look at which Democrats got voted in and what their stance was on the issues that were supposedly the root of voter discontent in the first place.

"I keep seeing reports on how these are the people who everyone can get along with, so what does that mean?"

Harris is absolutely right in identifying the fact that yesterday's charade was nothing more than re-arranging deck chairs, and this is proven again by the fact that likely speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has already vowed to protect Bush from criminal impeachment and the two have agreed to work together on advancing common cause agendas, such as the mass amnesty of illegal aliens that Bush couldn't get through under a Republican controlled House, an issue even Rush Limbaugh is now screaming bloody murder about.

Harris called for the temporary bias of favoritism for either the Republicans or the Democrats to be set aside in favor of the pursuit of trustworthy voting systems and the integrity of the electoral process in the long-term. Indicating that she had received more substantive complaints about vote fraud than in any other election, Harris said the possibility remained strong that this election had been thrown in order to re-invest artificial trust in electronic voting machines and stop the momentum of voting rights activists.

"Supposing I was really wanting to make sure that I could control elections through voting machines," said Harris, "I would probably throw a fight now and then because right now we have so much momentum going to get real change and then if you make it look like 'well there's nothing to look at here, move along,' then we won't get it fixed by 2008."

Will liberals continue to frolic around totally oblivious to the fact that the battle has just begun, or will they finally wake up and realize that it takes more than the re-election of Team B to stop the juggernaut of tyranny driven by both parties that has steamrollered America since the assassination of JFK in November 1963?