Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell Highlights Massive Inconsistencies In Christine Ford's TestimonyChris MenahanInformationLiberation Oct. 01, 2018 |
Sackler Family Granted Full Immunity From All Civil Legal Claims by 2nd Circuit Court in New York
"This is What AI Thinks of Us."
Fox News Goes All In Shilling 'Pride Month' in Wake of Tucker Carlson Firing
MLB Drops 'Pride' Logo After One Day Amid Target, Bud Light Boycott Fears
U.S. Embassy in Vatican Raises "LGBTQI+" Pride Flag Outside of the Holy See
![]() ![]() "In the legal context, here is my bottom line," Mitchell said. "A 'he said, she said' case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that." "Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them," Mitchell said. "For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard." Here's the key points which you can also read in PDF format. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() See the PDF for the timeline. The fact of the matter is, one lie is enough to throw out a witness's testimony. Ford lied about her fear of flight to delay the hearings. She literally jet-sets around the world to surf and was flying all over the country in the last two months!
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab and Minds. |