A Misguided Attack on The Future of Freedom Foundationby Jacob G. Hornberger
1.Cocaine Production Plummets After DEA Kicked Out of Bolivia
2.Texas Town Fires Police Dept., Hires Private Citizens For Security -- Guess What Happened to Crime?
3.Jerry Seinfeld Hilariously Trolls Cops After they Shut Down his Son's Lemonade Stand
4.Police Make Instructional Video on How to Be Nice While they Rob You
5.Bill That Was Supposed To Limit Police Drone Activity Changed By Lobbyist To Enable Weaponized Drones
6.Vester Lee Flanagan, Social Justice Avenger
7.City of San Jose Looking To Attach Automatic License Plate Readers To Garbage Trucks
8.Financial Times Calls For Abolishing Cash
9.Reality Check: Is There A Link Between Mass Shootings and Anti-Depressants?
10.Police are So Scared of Jury Nullification they Defy Judge's Order and Unlawfully Removed Activists
In an article at PJMedia.com, writer Keith Farrell suggests that libertarians should support foreign interventionism and specifically takes The Future of Freedom Foundation and LewRockwell.com to task for opposing foreign interventionism. Acknowledging that some U.S. interventions have proven to be absolute disasters, Farrell feels that libertarians should nonetheless be supporting U.S. foreign interventionism in selected cases.
Farrell is wrong. Not only is foreign interventionism contrary to libertarian principles, it inevitably produces destructive results for both the targeted nation and for the American people.
Full Article »