A Critique of "Against Libertarian Brutalism"by Paul Bonneau
Strike The Root
1.VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving
2.The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance
3.Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government
4.Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement
5.Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department
6.Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games
7.LA to Scan All Cars, Publicly Shame Anyone Who Drives Through a 'Prostitution Area'
8.Details of How The Paris Attacks Were Carried Out Show Little Effort by Attackers to Hide Themselves
9.Watch Cop Lie as He Acts Out What Happened When He Executed a Teen Contained On a Bus
10.Rubio: Side With Turkey and Islamic State in Confrontation With Russia
Jeffrey Tucker writes a thoughtful (if not concise) article in his Against Libertarian Brutalism, but at the end, one is left unsatisfied. It has the flavor of one big straw man argument, as well as looking like a bit of “divide and conquer,” splitting libertarians unnecessarily into two distinct camps (as if we did not have enough camps already).
Toward the end, Tucker asks, "It all comes down to the fundamental motivation behind the support of liberty itself. What is its overarching purpose?"
That is indeed the question.
Full Article »