The Water Bed Effect in Drug ProhibitionBy Jeffrey Miron
1.VIDEO: Woman Reports Cop's Rude Behavior, Cop Retaliates By Pulling Her Over & Beating Her
2.VIDEO: Dashcam Refutes Cop's Story of "Fearing For His Life," Shows Him Taser Man For Parking Ticket
3.Woman Called 911 to Report Stolen Wallet, Crazed Cop Showed Up and Beat Her Unconscious
4.Drudge on AJ: Copyright Laws Will Destroy the Internet
5.'Neutralizing' John Lennon: One Man Against The 'Monster'
6.Cops Lied to Get Innocent Disabled Man Imprisoned for Elderly Woman's Rape & Murder, Hid Contradictory Evidence
7.VIDEO: Cop Smashes Suspect's Face With Shotgun, Gets Charged With Felony
8.Uber's Peaceful Revolution
9.Video: 'I Get Falsely Arrested Then My House Gets Robbed Live On Twitch.Tv Livestream'
10.Use-of-Force Report Finds NYPD Completely Uninterested in Policing Itself
If you lie down on a water bed, the amount of water does not change; it just moves elsewhere.
A similar phenomenon occurs with drug prohibition; targeting one drug reduces its use, but that displaced demand shows up somewhere else.
According to a new WaPo story, this is exactly what has occurred over the past ten years with respect to prescription opiates and heroin. As enforcement cracked down on Oxycontin and similar medications, demand shifted to heroin. And since purity information is noisy for an illicit good, heroin deaths increased noticeably.
Prohibition advocates will presumably respond with calls for greater enforcement against both prescription opiates and heroin, but the right response is the opposite. While opiate use carries risks, opiate prohibition makes these worse. Higher prices caused by prohibition, for example, encourage users to inject to get a big bang for the buck. But then prohibition-induced restriction of clean syringes fosters needle-sharing, spreading HIV.
The right test for policy is never whether some good or activity is "risky," but whether government intervention reduces those risks, and at what costs. Drug prohibition fails this test.