1.Video: Cop Arrests Subway Performer For Singing, Despite Cop Reading Aloud Rule Saying It's Permitted
2.Video Shows Officer Coaxing Friendly Pets Closer With Kissing Noises Before Opening Fire
3.ISIS Cited as Michigan Village's Police Push for Secrecy
4.County Justifies Warrantless Raids Because Cannabis Plants Are An 'Immediate Danger'
5.Reading the Road Map to a Police State
6.FBI Director Demands Law to Give Cops Backdoor Access to Everyone's Private Data
7.New Zealand Police Raid Home Of Reporter Who Embarrassed Gov't Officials & Was Working On Snowden Documents
8.Chicago Cops Loot Taxpayers For Settlement After Beating Woman During Raid; Video 'May Inflame Jury'
9.Police Officer Blames Everyone Else But Police Officers For The Public's General Distrust Of Law Enforcement
10.33 Police Officers Fire 600 Bullets into Car Knowing It Contained a Hostage
The Right to Discriminateby Will Grigg
New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez was a regular customer of hair stylist Antonio Darden. About two years ago, Darden decided that he would no longer accept the Governor’s business because of her opposition to the novel social arrangement called same-sex marriage.
Six years before Darden dropped Gov. Martinez as a customer, New Mexico resident Elaine Huguenin, who runs a photography business, declined a request to photograph what was described as a wedding ceremony between two women. Rather than finding another photographer willing to take their business, the women filed a complaint with a bureaucratic body calling itself the Human Rights Commission. That agency ruled that Huguenin had violated a state law against “sexual orientation discrimination” and imposed a $7,000 fine.
The New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the fine, and the case may be headed to the US Supreme Court.
As a business owner, Antonio Darden has an unconditional right to accept or reject customers for any reason he chooses. The same is true of Elaine Huguenin, or any other business owner, whether or not that right is respected by those presuming to rule us. Anti-discrimination ordinances permit the totalitarian micro-management of social relationships and nullify property rights – which is why they must be repealed.