The Right to Discriminateby Will Grigg
1.Graphic Video: Cop Knocks Woman Unconscious as 6-Year-Old Daughter Watches in Horror
2.Southern California Cop Deliberately Knocks Camera From Citizen, Claiming It Was "Accident"
3.Caught On Tape: Cop Jumpkicks Suspect After Shooting Him
4.Lawsuit Over Nude Crime Scene Photos Headed To Court
5.Cops Go Car To Car In Traffic Jam, Issue $18,000 In Fines For Cellphone Use At A Near Dead Stop
6.Stingray Uber Alles! St. Louis Cops Drop Case Against Robbery Suspects Rather Than Discuss Use Of IMSI Catcher
7.No Immunity For Cop Who Pepper-Sprayed & Left Man Handcuffed In Street To Be Hit By Car
8.The Latest On Medical Marijuana By State
9.Four Swedish Cops on Vacation in New York Just Showed Americans What REAL Policing Looks Like
10.Cop Smash & Grab: Houston Police Caught on Video Kicking in Door to Business, Stealing Cash
New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez was a regular customer of hair stylist Antonio Darden. About two years ago, Darden decided that he would no longer accept the Governor’s business because of her opposition to the novel social arrangement called same-sex marriage.
Six years before Darden dropped Gov. Martinez as a customer, New Mexico resident Elaine Huguenin, who runs a photography business, declined a request to photograph what was described as a wedding ceremony between two women. Rather than finding another photographer willing to take their business, the women filed a complaint with a bureaucratic body calling itself the Human Rights Commission. That agency ruled that Huguenin had violated a state law against “sexual orientation discrimination” and imposed a $7,000 fine.
The New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the fine, and the case may be headed to the US Supreme Court.
As a business owner, Antonio Darden has an unconditional right to accept or reject customers for any reason he chooses. The same is true of Elaine Huguenin, or any other business owner, whether or not that right is respected by those presuming to rule us. Anti-discrimination ordinances permit the totalitarian micro-management of social relationships and nullify property rights – which is why they must be repealed.