To Collectivists, Lenin And Mussolini Defined "Liberty"by Will Grigg
1.VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving
2.Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government
3.The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance
4.Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement
5.Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department
6.New Photos Show Chicago Cops On Burger King CPU Where Laquan McDonald Shooting Footage 'Disappeared'
7.Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games
8.LA to Scan All Cars, Publicly Shame Anyone Who Drives Through a 'Prostitution Area'
9.Details of How The Paris Attacks Were Carried Out Show Little Effort by Attackers to Hide Themselves
10.Watch Cop Lie as He Acts Out What Happened When He Executed a Teen Contained On a Bus
A character played by John Wayne once dismissed an irritating fellow as someone who was merely spitting out words in order to watch them splatter. In similar fashion, the leftist publication Salon continues to emit anti-libertarian screeds in the hope of attracting internet traffic. It isn’t interested in examining ideas.
Salon’s most recent effort focuses on a proposed measure in Kansas that would recognize the right of business owners not to accept patronage from homosexual couples. According to the author, "Since it is the state that is ultimately tasked to bring out the violent enforcers who effectuate the discriminating intents of public accommodations providers, the state literally cannot get out of the way."
Actually, anti-discrimination laws depend on threat and practice of state violence. This isn’t true of a business owner who merely declines the patronage of someone he finds objectionable.
Without naming Mussolini explicitly, the Salon contributor begins with the assumption found in the fascist dictator’s totalitarian formula: Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state. He does explicitly invoke Lenin’s statement that the basic political question is “who does what to whom.”
So according to Salon, “liberty” is a gift of the state, and libertarians are heretics because they reject Lenin’s doctrines.