Philly Prosecutors Won't Seize Family's Home Over Son's $40 Drug DealChris | InformationLiberationDec. 28, 2014 |
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
Mike Johnson Pushes Debunked Lie That Israeli Babies Were 'Cooked in Ovens' On October 7
'These Protesters Belong in Jail': Gov. Abbott Cheers Arrest of Pro-Palestine Protesters at UT Austin
Senate Passes $95B Giveaway to Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan, Combined With TikTok Ban
'It Has to Be Stopped': Netanyahu Demands Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Colleges Be Shut Down
After intense media scrutiny and an ensuing lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice, Philadelphia prosecutors have decided not to steal a family's home over their son's $40 drug deal. Philly.com reports: Philadelphia prosecutors agreed Thursday to halt efforts to seize the homes of two of the lead plaintiffs in a widely publicized federal suit challenging the city's use of civil forfeiture laws in drug cases.Asset forfeiture is straightforward armed robbery committed by those tasked with allegedly protecting people's person and property. Rather than act as a protector of private property, the government acts as an expropriator of private property. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe points out, this is a fundamental contradiction with the idea of a state: it's a private property protecting organization funded through the expropriation of private property, namely through taxes, but also through direct seizure of people's property as is done with asset forfeiture. To quote Hoppe, "...a tax-funded life-and-property protection agency is a contradiction in terms: an expropriating property protector. Motivated, as everyone is, by self-interest and the disutility of labor, but equipped with the unique power to tax, state agents will invariably strive to maximize expenditures on protection — and almost all of a nation's wealth can conceivably be consumed by the cost of protection — and at the same time to minimize the actual production of protection. The more money one can spend and the less one must work for it, the better off one will be."This explains why, despite outrageously high levels of taxation and government spending, it's never enough, and now the government is taking part in direct property seizures as though the US is a third world kleptocracy. Here's the original story in case you missed it: _ Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here. |