informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Mar 17 2014, 5:22 AM Category: Commentary Source: Strike The Root Print

A Critique of "Against Libertarian Brutalism"

by Paul Bonneau

Jeffrey Tucker writes a thoughtful (if not concise) article in his Against Libertarian Brutalism, but at the end, one is left unsatisfied. It has the flavor of one big straw man argument, as well as looking like a bit of “divide and conquer,” splitting libertarians unnecessarily into two distinct camps (as if we did not have enough camps already).

Toward the end, Tucker asks, "It all comes down to the fundamental motivation behind the support of liberty itself. What is its overarching purpose?"

That is indeed the question.

Full Article »





Latest Commentary
- High Priestess Ginsburg Rebukes the Heathen
- Yes, Obama is a Tyrant, Just Like His Predecessor
- Commerce is Civilization; Government is Barbarism
- Springsteen? Mellencamp? Creedence? Heretics All!
- What Exactly Is 'Racism'?
- All Hail the Heroic Bootlegger -- Exemplar of the American Spirit
- Inside the Belly of the Beast for Sunday Service
- Big Brother Wants Your Son









Comments Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Mar 17 2014, 2:34 PM

Link
7147 Part of the problem, I think, is that he mis-identifies his groups.

What he terms the "humanitarian libertarians" I see as the true inheritors of the libertarian movement, the ones seeking a better life for EVERYONE in liberty.

What he terms the "brutal libertarians" I see as being more properly called "anarchists". They demand their right to do everything he lists (allow me to repeat): "[...] to form homogeneous tribes, to work out their biases in action, to ostracize people based on 'politically incorrect' standards, to hate to their heart’s content so long as no violence is used as a means, to shout down people based on their demographics or political opinions, to be openly racist and sexist, to exclude and isolate and be generally malcontented [sic] with modernity, and to reject civil standards of values and etiquette in favor of antisocial norms."

But none of the items on that list can be done without forcible oppression; cannot be done without the use of emotional abuse, bullying, authoritarian fiat, assault, theft, murder, and other harms as day-to-day tools. The "brutal" freedoms that Mr. Tucker lists and that his brutal libertarians would hope to obtain are all, ultimately, only obtained through violence.

Let's take the first example on the list: "to form homogenous tribes." That cannot be done without excluding individuals who are "inappropriate" for the tribe; by force if necessary. Take the man a while back who was determined to create an "all-white" town in South Dakota: Suppose a black man comes to town, just driving through: Would they allow him to pass through? Or order him by authoritarian fiat to deviate from his freely chosen path and, should he refuse, use physical violence to drive him away? Freedom, libertarians are told, allows us to do whatever we want so long as we don't hurt someone else: By that definition, the black man is oppressed.

The brutal libertarians cannot have these freedoms without using violence, but if told they could not do all the things Mr. Tucker listed, they would claim, "We are oppressed." Whether they admit it to themselves or not, they are opposed to libertarian ideals which, offering as little interference as practical to maintain peace, would nevertheless find it necessary to interfere with their activities.

Which is why I say that Mr. Tucker's so-called "brutal libertarians" are really anarchists. Because, in the end, they would not accept even those limited demands imposed by a true libertarian system. It is "too much government" for them.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

SWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong Home - 07/25People Wearing Sagging Pants Face $500 Fine, Jail In Florida City - 07/22U.S. Admits Its MH17 ‘Evidence’ is Based on YouTube Clips & Social Media Posts - 07/23Woman With Allergies Arrested and Imprisoned for Buying Sudafed - 07/24California Cop Arrests Man for Video Recording "Private Cars" from Public Sidewalk - 07/24Bill Maher Slams Police State Militarization - 07/24Daily Show Slams Highway Patrol "Banditos" Robbing People Through Forfeiture Laws - 07/24A Kind Woman Stops to Rescue Ducklings on the Roadside, Cop Shows up, Writes Her a Ticket for It - 07/25

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top