informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Mar 17 2014, 5:22 AM Category: Commentary Source: Strike The Root Print

A Critique of "Against Libertarian Brutalism"

by Paul Bonneau

Jeffrey Tucker writes a thoughtful (if not concise) article in his Against Libertarian Brutalism, but at the end, one is left unsatisfied. It has the flavor of one big straw man argument, as well as looking like a bit of “divide and conquer,” splitting libertarians unnecessarily into two distinct camps (as if we did not have enough camps already).

Toward the end, Tucker asks, "It all comes down to the fundamental motivation behind the support of liberty itself. What is its overarching purpose?"

That is indeed the question.

Full Article »





Latest Commentary
- False Flags, Biker Gangs, and the PATCON Legacy
- Is the Liberland Experiment Viable?
- The Prohibitionist Song Remains the Same
- Five Bogus Excuses for Opposing Freedom
- Why Was Osama bin Laden Killed and Not Captured?
- Further Confirmation of Hersh and Why bin Laden Was Murdered
- Support Your Local Private Peace Officer: He Has A Dangerous Job
- 'We the People' Need to Circle the Wagons: The Government Is on the Warpath









Comments Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Mar 17 2014, 2:34 PM

Link
7147 Part of the problem, I think, is that he mis-identifies his groups.

What he terms the "humanitarian libertarians" I see as the true inheritors of the libertarian movement, the ones seeking a better life for EVERYONE in liberty.

What he terms the "brutal libertarians" I see as being more properly called "anarchists". They demand their right to do everything he lists (allow me to repeat): "[...] to form homogeneous tribes, to work out their biases in action, to ostracize people based on 'politically incorrect' standards, to hate to their heart’s content so long as no violence is used as a means, to shout down people based on their demographics or political opinions, to be openly racist and sexist, to exclude and isolate and be generally malcontented [sic] with modernity, and to reject civil standards of values and etiquette in favor of antisocial norms."

But none of the items on that list can be done without forcible oppression; cannot be done without the use of emotional abuse, bullying, authoritarian fiat, assault, theft, murder, and other harms as day-to-day tools. The "brutal" freedoms that Mr. Tucker lists and that his brutal libertarians would hope to obtain are all, ultimately, only obtained through violence.

Let's take the first example on the list: "to form homogenous tribes." That cannot be done without excluding individuals who are "inappropriate" for the tribe; by force if necessary. Take the man a while back who was determined to create an "all-white" town in South Dakota: Suppose a black man comes to town, just driving through: Would they allow him to pass through? Or order him by authoritarian fiat to deviate from his freely chosen path and, should he refuse, use physical violence to drive him away? Freedom, libertarians are told, allows us to do whatever we want so long as we don't hurt someone else: By that definition, the black man is oppressed.

The brutal libertarians cannot have these freedoms without using violence, but if told they could not do all the things Mr. Tucker listed, they would claim, "We are oppressed." Whether they admit it to themselves or not, they are opposed to libertarian ideals which, offering as little interference as practical to maintain peace, would nevertheless find it necessary to interfere with their activities.

Which is why I say that Mr. Tucker's so-called "brutal libertarians" are really anarchists. Because, in the end, they would not accept even those limited demands imposed by a true libertarian system. It is "too much government" for them.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: None Are Safe from the State's Plundering Parasites - 05/22Baltimore Cop Given Just 6 Months; Assault Victim Speaks Out - 05/22Charges Dropped Against Cop Caught Having Sex With Cows - 05/21Innocent Bystander Attacked by Police K9 In Fresno - 05/21Pennsylvania Limits Secondary Questioning During Traffic Stop - 05/22Indiana Cops Arrest Man for Asking for Their Badge Number - 05/21New Police Radars Are Being Used To 'See' Inside Homes - 05/08Man Holds Alleged Carjacker at Gunpoint Until Cops Arrive - 05/22

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top