informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 29 2014, 5:22 PM Category: Economy Source: LearnLiberty Print

Government Regulation: The Most Dangerous Monopoly




Everyone wants the items they buy to be safe to use or consume. Prof. Howard Baetjer of Towson University explains that when products undergo third-party certification processes to determine their safety, market forces are able to optimize the amount of testing conducted and consumers can use the information provided by certification firms to make their own decisions. It is difficult to say how much testing is enough: another test can always be run on a product, but at some point the benefit of the extra testing outweighs the costs. In a free-market system, competition among certification firms allows the market to work as it should and prevents both under- and over-testing of products. Conversely, when the government holds the monopoly on safety standards, products are likely to be over-tested, delaying their entry into the market and making them more expensive. Sometimes the costs of such delays cannot be quantified; lives can be lost while life-saving medicines are held up in safety-testing processes.

Check out Prof. Baetjer's book that inspired this video: http://www.freeourmarkets.com/book/

Animated by Tomasz Kaye: http://www.patreon.com/tomaszkaye





Latest Economy
- Oregon Legalizes Pot this Week -- But Thanks to the Liquor Control Commission, You Can't Buy It
- Greece Illustrates 150 Years of Socialist Failure in Europe
- VIDEO: Americans Refuse to Purchase 10 oz Silver Bar Worth $160 for 10 Bucks
- The 'Recycling' Scam Falls Apart
- Which Countries Prefer Capitalism?
- DC's First Cat Cafe Opens Tomorrow (No Thanks to Regulators)
- The Miracle of Air-Conditioning
- Let's Hope Machines Take Our Jobs: We Want Wealth, Not Jobs









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 1:54 AM

Link
7147 How do I know if the third party testing firm does its job? As opposed to, say, simply taking a payment under the table from the manufacturer to give a good report on the manufacturer's crappy product?

The tester's reputation? Ha ha ha ha ha ha .... Look at the current relationships between investment firms ("manufacturers") and ratings firms ("testers"). Did the ratings firms' reputations matter enough to them to keep them from helping the investment firms screw private investors? Nope: Money talked and the investors just got screwed.

So the manufacturer and the tester laugh all the way to the bank, and I'm just screwed. This is better than government how? Because the fat-cat manufacturer saved testing money at my expense?

Whose side is the author on? Well, looks to me like he's on the side of fat-cat manufacturers; while individuals like me can just plan to be screwed. I see no basis for advantage in this process.
Chris

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 2:08 AM

Link
Because that would destroy their credibility and throw their entire business away. Government regulated rating agencies on the other hand do exactly as you describe, certified trash as AAA, screwing people over en masse, yet their businesses and government certifications are still intact.
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 4:17 AM

Link
7147 Individuals might worry about their personal reputation. The deceptions involved people who profited personally and handsomely for their cooperative lies. "If the investors lost money and my company's reputation is screwed, so what? I still got mine."

So maybe I didn't make my point clear: This article (and your statement) offer ZERO PROOF that things would be better without a government.

And if that also implies ZERO PROOF that government is better, so? I still want an incentive to go through the change, and this article provides none for me; only for the fat-cats who would steal my money.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Despite Crying In Court, Deputy Gets 10 Years For Crash Which Killed Teen After Judge Questions His Sincerity - 06/30Illinois Police Scream "Stop Resisting" and Tase Unresisting Man on Train for Using Foul Language - 06/30Nail Salon Owner Sues For Return Of Life Savings Seized By DEA Agents At Airport - 06/30Love of Power Wins -- Now the Yezhovschina Can Begin - 06/30The Emergence of Orwellian Newspeak and the Death of Free Speech - 06/30Newsday Editor: Carve Hate Speech Out Of First Amendment, Hold Websites Responsible If Users Post Hate Speech - 06/30Award-Winning Comedian: Politically Correct Left Has Killed Comedy - 06/30Bad News: Supreme Court Refuses to Review Oracle v. Google API Copyright Decision - 06/30

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top