informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 29 2014, 5:22 PM Category: Economy Source: LearnLiberty Print

Government Regulation: The Most Dangerous Monopoly




Everyone wants the items they buy to be safe to use or consume. Prof. Howard Baetjer of Towson University explains that when products undergo third-party certification processes to determine their safety, market forces are able to optimize the amount of testing conducted and consumers can use the information provided by certification firms to make their own decisions. It is difficult to say how much testing is enough: another test can always be run on a product, but at some point the benefit of the extra testing outweighs the costs. In a free-market system, competition among certification firms allows the market to work as it should and prevents both under- and over-testing of products. Conversely, when the government holds the monopoly on safety standards, products are likely to be over-tested, delaying their entry into the market and making them more expensive. Sometimes the costs of such delays cannot be quantified; lives can be lost while life-saving medicines are held up in safety-testing processes.

Check out Prof. Baetjer's book that inspired this video: http://www.freeourmarkets.com/book/

Animated by Tomasz Kaye: http://www.patreon.com/tomaszkaye





Latest Economy
- Low Inflation? The Price Of Ground Beef Has Risen 17 Percent Over The Past Year
- EFF, Internet Archive, and reddit Oppose New York's BitLicense Proposal
- Who's Afraid of the Workers' Revolution?
- Sports Stadiums: Temples to Crony Capitalism
- Obamacare Architect Says Society Would Be Better Off If People Only Lived To Age 75
- Elizabeth Warren Says US Has "No Future" If Free-Market Embraced
- Cost of Renouncing US Citizenship Goes From Free In 2010 to 450$, And Now It's Been Jacked to $2,350
- Colorado's Illegal Pot Market Thrives









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 1:54 AM

Link
7147 How do I know if the third party testing firm does its job? As opposed to, say, simply taking a payment under the table from the manufacturer to give a good report on the manufacturer's crappy product?

The tester's reputation? Ha ha ha ha ha ha .... Look at the current relationships between investment firms ("manufacturers") and ratings firms ("testers"). Did the ratings firms' reputations matter enough to them to keep them from helping the investment firms screw private investors? Nope: Money talked and the investors just got screwed.

So the manufacturer and the tester laugh all the way to the bank, and I'm just screwed. This is better than government how? Because the fat-cat manufacturer saved testing money at my expense?

Whose side is the author on? Well, looks to me like he's on the side of fat-cat manufacturers; while individuals like me can just plan to be screwed. I see no basis for advantage in this process.
Chris

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 2:08 AM

Link
Because that would destroy their credibility and throw their entire business away. Government regulated rating agencies on the other hand do exactly as you describe, certified trash as AAA, screwing people over en masse, yet their businesses and government certifications are still intact.
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 4:17 AM

Link
7147 Individuals might worry about their personal reputation. The deceptions involved people who profited personally and handsomely for their cooperative lies. "If the investors lost money and my company's reputation is screwed, so what? I still got mine."

So maybe I didn't make my point clear: This article (and your statement) offer ZERO PROOF that things would be better without a government.

And if that also implies ZERO PROOF that government is better, so? I still want an incentive to go through the change, and this article provides none for me; only for the fat-cats who would steal my money.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Mission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement' - 10/23Chicago Cop Who Assaulted 89-Yr-Old For Requesting He Stop Cursing Gets 3 Years - 10/23SWAT Officers Wrongfully Detain This Man For Filming in Public, Then it Gets Really Infuratiating - 10/22Either Praise the Police, or Shut Up - 10/22Obstruction Convictions Uncover Recordings of LA Sheriff's Dept. Officers Threatening FBI Agents And Federal Witnesses - 10/22EFF Guide: Know Your Rights When Dealing With Police - 10/22Prison Guard Admits to Sexually Assaulting Dozens of Inmates, Selling Drugs in Prison. No Jail Time - 10/22Land of the Free -- 1 in 3 Americans Are on File with the FBI in the U.S. Police State - 10/22

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top