informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Sep 26 2013, 10:12 PM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: Common Dreams Print

NSA Spied on MLK, US Senators and Other Vietnam War Critics, Documents Show

Agency's self-proclaimed 'disreputable if not outright illegal' practices threaten civil liberties then and now, critics warn
Jacob Chamberlain


NSA documents that were declassified this week show that the agency—which has come under increased scrutiny for its dragnet surveillance practices—heavily surveilled and tapped the phones of high-profile critics of the Vietnam War, including Martin Luther King Jr., Muhammad Ali, and two U.S. senators including Idaho Democrat Frank Church.

They were joined on the NSA's "watch list" by roughly 1,600 other prominent war critics whose overseas phone calls, telexes and cables were monitored.

While Vietnam-era spying on U.S. citizens, conducted under the codename Operation Minaret, was known at the time, the targets of this surveillance were not public until now.

The documents were forced to be declassified this week following an appeal to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) by an independent research institute, the National Security Archive.

Kevin Gosztola at FireDogLake reports Thursday, the documents, which comprise of the NSA's own multi-volume history of the agency, show that the Minaret project “employed unusual procedures.”

"For example," Gosztola writes, "the NSA did not use the 'usual serialization' to distribute the reports. The reports were made to look like human intelligence reports instead of signals intelligence reports."

At one point the documents show that the NSA was all too aware of its "disreputable" tactics. The document states, “Years later, the NSA lawyer who first looked at the procedural aspects stated that the people involved seemed to understand that the operation was disreputable if not outright illegal.”

The documents also mention that the NSA director at the time, Lew Allen, also felt it “appeared to be a possible violation of constitutional guarantees."

As Matthew Aid and William Burr at Foreign Policy note, a startling revelation within the documents is the fact that the NSA spied on two prominent members of Congress, Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.).

"As shocking as the recent revelations about the NSA's domestic eavesdropping have been," Aid and Burr write, "there has been no evidence so far of today's signal intelligence corps taking a step like this, to monitor the White House's political enemies."

However, as civil liberties expert Christopher H. Pyle said in a statement, this week's revelations about the NSA's past could be a view into the NSA's current practices:
We still need more information about what happened then. But more critically, we need more information about what's happening now. These revelations raise the obvious question: If the NSA was targeting people like Sen. Frank Church, who were in a position to oversee the NSA—is that happening now? That is, are people like intelligence committee chairs Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and other congressional leaders -- who are supposed to be providing oversight themselves -- compromised in some way by the NSA? If so, as seems quite certain from the recent Edward Snowden revelations, then how can they conduct genuine oversight of the NSA with their committees?





Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- The Emergence of Orwellian Newspeak and the Death of Free Speech
- Newsday Editor: Carve Hate Speech Out Of First Amendment, Hold Websites Responsible If Users Post Hate Speech
- Award-Winning Comedian: Politically Correct Left Has Killed Comedy
- South Carolina Massacre Results In Apple Going Flag-Stupid In The App Store
- Authorities Can't Find Anything To Charge Alleged 'Extremist' With But Still Insist On 24-Hour Monitoring, Computer Restrictions
- Australia Passes Its Own SOPA, Ignores All Concerns About It
- Confirmed: DOJ Obtained Gag Order To Keep Reason From Informing Affected Commenters Or Discussing Subpoena
- Evidence Suggests DOJ Got A Gag Order Silencing Reason Over Its Bogus Subpoena









Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Sep 28 2013, 8:01 PM

Link
7147 Oh, I'm SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO surprised...just about as much as the space between my pinched fingers.

"Conspiracy theories" are called that in a pejorative sense, but more and more are validated all the time. How can we justify such denigration when so many are ultimately proven true?
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 29 2013, 1:21 AM

Link
65110 Conspiracies don't exist! I read it on the Internet. Honest!


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Cop Kills Man with Patrol Car While Speeding & Looking at Laptop, Flexes Blue Privilege – No Charges - 07/03Cop Tells Woman There's "No Excuse" For Parking The Wrong Way, Says It's Against The Law To Film Him - 07/03NYPD Cops Terrified of New Bills that Will Stop them from Choking and Illegally Searching People - 07/03Why Not an 'Independence From the State' Day? - 07/03Chicago Institutes New "Amusement Tax" On Netflix, Streaming Services - 07/02The Real Untold Story Of Government's Takedown of Silk Road - 07/03Florida Man Sentenced to 8 Months for Driving Away from Interior Border Patrol Checkpoint Too Quickly - 07/03TSA Asks America To LOL At Traveler Who Had $75,000 Taken From Him By Federal Agents - 07/02

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top