The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Sep 24 2013, 10:40 PM Category: Commentary Source: Jeffrey Tucker Print

Corporate America Goes Off the Grid

Jeffrey Tucker

As much as I love technology, part of me hates being so dependent on a live wall plug wherever I go. You find yourself trapped in some setting without accessible wall plugs and your phone is dying. You charge from you laptop, but that is dying too. You take recourse to your tablet, but that will eventually kick the bucket too.

When you finally get to a power supply, you hog as much as you can in the time you have, but you are aware that life as you know it is only as good as the flow of electricity to which you have access.

Then there's the nightmare scenario of a blackout that lasts days or even weeks. What then? It hasn't happened to me since the advent of the digital age. But it could as soon as tomorrow. Forget the meat in the fridge. I can live off canned goods. But where and how will I recharge my phone, my laptop, my tablet, my e-cigarette? How will I buy and spend my Bitcoins?

Many of these thoughts I've carried with me privately and tried to push them aside. Maybe this is just the way life works. It's full of risks. There is no security in this world. In the end, we live one day to the next. We can't be consumed by disaster scenarios, and we probably can't prepare for them either, right? I know many people do. They buy generators. They go "off the grid" to test their wherewithal. But that's not me. I have no interest in reverting back in time.

But here's the problem: the complication and the thing that makes me stop and think. And it is the single most alarming fact about the technological times in which we live. All these utilities are provided by public utilities.

They are sort of private (monopolistically private) and also local (geographically noncompetitive), but also government established, regulated, managed, and, in the end, owned. The grid itself is a government-codified system, having been nationalized in 1934 and then deregulated at the wholesale level only later.

In short, electricity itself the thing we depend on so completely in every aspect of our lives is a government system. And you know what that means? It means that it is finally undependable and regressive, not taking advantage of any force of innovation that has improved every other product and service out there. We are still living in the 1920s, a fact which you can vaguely discern by how the U.S. plug shape has not changed in anyone's living memory.

So when will this system be finally smashed by the forces of progress? Incredibly, it is happening already. It turns out that over the last 10 years, a sea change has occurred in the provision of power. Roughly 40,000 commercial and industrial sites in the U.S. have decided to spurn the government system and make their own systems of power generation. This is a quadrupling over the last seven years.

Today, on-site electrical generation accounts for only 5% of the power supply, but the trend is actually far more significant because it is happening first among what were once the largest clients of the electrical companies. And there are big plans in place: Wal-Mart plans to increase its solar-generated share of electrical use from 4% to 20% over the next seven years, while Apple's main data center makes all the power it consumes.

According to The Wall Street Journal, "The growing number of companies that are at least partly energy self-sufficient is sending a shudder through the utility industry, threatening its revenues and growth prospects."

What kicked this trend into high gear was Hurricane Sandy. It sent a message to the whole of Corporate America: You can die the death at any point, and there is nothing you can do about it. That's when the preparations began.

In other words, it is the fear among companies that they would be forced to stop doing business that is pushing this trend forward. This is the market responding to a felt need.

It turns out, then, my anxieties about electricity are not paranoid. They are felt even more intensely by large companies who have far more skin in the game than I do. And this is creating a trajectory of progress despite every attempt by government to stop it or divert it with crazy schemes involving windmills or whatever. The need for power is at the core of modern life, and it is a key to the future. It will not be stopped.

So what will happen to the dinosaur utilities? Look at this wonderful statement from a top executive at American Electric Power: "Am I going to just sit here and take it and ultimately be a caretaker of a museum?" Deciding against that path, he further suggested that perhaps the big power companies ought to give in and make themselves useful by helping companies install their own electricity-generating equipment.

Let's broaden out this context a bit by going back one hundred years. Electricity was the coolest thing going, installed and used first by the rich and then by urban consumers and eventually by everyone else. Government was taking an ever larger role in people's lives and was looking for some way to become the hero. Electrification became the great motto for all states in the world, from the U.S. to Russia.

After the Bolshevik Revolution, the new government adopted the slogan "Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country." Electrification had to happen, said Lenin, "otherwise, the country will remain a small peasant country" Only when the country has been electrified, and industry, agriculture, and transport have been placed on the technical basis of modern large-scale industry, only then shall we be fully victorious."

The provision of technological progress, then, was to be the great achievement of the modern state, the thing that would cause the whole world to shout with glee: Up with the public sector and all that it means to us as a civilization!

This trend continued in the New Deal. FDR sought to grab the whole power of technological initiative from the private sector and place it in the hands of the executive state. This was a driving motivation of his administration's programs, and it culminated in World War II, when technology was turned from serving people to killing them en masse.

But now look what's happened. We are blessed to live in a time of astonishing advancement, none of which is being pushed by government; on the contrary, government's main contribution is to slow it down.

The reality is everywhere before us. The tools we use every day on the Internet come courtesy of the profit-and-loss system of enterprise that governments have tried for 100 years to displace. Our coolest toys are provided by entrepreneurs, not bureaucrats. The things we use to get information, to get goods and services, to get medical care, are being pushed by the marketplace, despite government's every attempt to crush it.

And what has happened to the wonderful energy that the government said some 100 years ago that it would give us? It is being systematically eschewed as old-fashioned and unsuitable to a modern people. The bureaucratic contraptions of command and control have been reduced to the role of spectators watching their empire gradually fade from view and a new world of private energy provision emerge one step at a time.

This is the larger picture. Another limb of the nation-state is being sawed off by the forces of progress, as fueled by markets, private property, exchange, and the unstoppable drive of humanity to not let anything stand in the way of gaining a better life.
Jeffrey Tucker is the publisher and executive editor of Laissez-Faire Books, the Primus inter pares of the Laissez Faire Club, and the author of Bourbon for Breakfast: Living Outside the Statist Quo, It's a Jetsons World: Private Miracles and Public Crimes, and A Beautiful Anarchy: How to Build Your Own Civilization in the Digital Age, among thousands of articles. Click to sign up for his free daily letter. Email him: | Facebook | Twitter | Google

Latest Commentary
- Let's Talk About...The Plague
- With Mass Shootings, The State Makes Us Less Safe
- Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'
- Fear Is The Name of The Game
- This Thanksgiving, Let's Say 'No Thanks' to The Tyranny of The American Police State
- Donald Trump's Presidential "Heel Turn"
- Katniss Vs. Power: The Lessons of Hunger Games
- Tracking ISIS to DC's Doorsteps

Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sep 25 2013, 1:23 AM

Wouldn't the solution go something like: " hey, public utilities worker, help us, and we'll help you." (?)

Please, the "government" doesn't control the world, but, it's people who "work for the government," that control the world. I'm still waiting on a shift-change - it's only a matter of time before these psychopaths self-destruct; (or, kill one another - I don't really care). Hopefully, the next bunch of fake-blue's will be a bit more reasonable.

Posted: Sep 25 2013, 1:31 PM

10710 Females control the World because they value Gold over all else. Single men do not rule the World, married men's wives do. When Females choose a new valuation system, Males will aspire to accumulate the currency of wealth to demonstrate the survival of fitness. Pretty simple.

Posted: Sep 26 2013, 2:36 AM

That explains the reason Obama comes across less manly than his wife... Thanks anon. 10710; though, I could give a F*ck less about gold, and, a system that values that gold over human beings. I do respect your input however, 'survival of the fittest' cannot be properly applied to our current (dysfunctioning) system.

Presently, the strongest / smartest, are facilitating the weakest. Perhaps, you can predict the outcome as well? That outcome is the only reason I'm still alive.

Posted: Sep 26 2013, 10:04 AM

165138 Computers are my life, and yet I wish I knew what it was like to live in an unplugged world.
My profession is directly related to technology, so I can't say much about it.
As far as the power goes, even if it wasn't a business-run system, it should be a state-run system.
Instead of having three massive grids (East, West, Texas), we should have a different grid for each state.
What makes up a government? The people that run it.
Whether you accept it or not, the US government runs everything you see, from media to your lights.
If we shifted into a State-run system, where we replace the federal government powers with State powers, we would thrive in ways our country has never seen.
Debt would be per-state, and wouldn't crush everyone.

Posted: Sep 28 2013, 7:22 PM

@165138 - "What makes up a government?" I would say, "clever liars, who have many shortcomings."

"The people that run it." (I'm assuming this was a question). I would have to say, "people that have been programmed to run it."

"Whether you (I) accept it or not, the US government runs everything you see"...

I reject that notion. Trees grow, people reproduce, stars move through the sky.... All, without assistance from the US government.

If you'd truly like to know what it's like to be "unplugged," I can help you. Computers aren't my life, so, I likely can't explain being "unplugged" in terms that you're familiar with, but, I can likely get you to "finite reality."

"If we shifted into a State-run system"... That presents to me as: "time travels backwards;" Einstein's definition of "insanity," in other words.


Posted: Sep 28 2013, 7:33 PM

@Libertarian 165138, just, be careful what you wish for. In this fake-believe world of "knowledge is power," the construct engineers have created an "Atlas Program." People start believing that the world's problems, should be taken upon their own shoulders - which is absolute b/s.

A network node asked me once: "you are having a problem, so, why is it a problem?" If that question doesn't slap one back into reality.....

Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder - 11/27World's Most 'Adorable' Drug Kingpin Is Actually The Daughter of Texas DEA Head Honcho - 11/26Pot Breathalyzers: Coming Soon to A Drug War Near You - 11/27City Settles After Police Chief Arrested Man For Calling Public Official A 'Liar' - 11/27Georgia Sheriff Puts Up Sign Warning People Who Disagree With Him About God to Leave - 11/27Bezos Beats Musk - 11/27Is Black Friday Racist? - 11/25

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up