The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Sep 09 2013, 1:19 AM Category: Commentary Source: Nathan Goodman Print

John Kerry and the Orwellian Language of War

Nathan Goodman

When is a war not a war? According to John Kerry, launching cruise missiles at Syria is not a war. Testifying before the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry said, “President Obama is not asking America to go to war.”

Kerry’s argument seems to hinge on the idea that no American ground troops will likely be deployed. Of the proposed strikes, Kerry said, “I just don’t consider that going to war in the classic sense of coming to Congress and asking for a declaration of war and training troops and sending people abroad and putting young Americans in harm’s way.” Perhaps no Americans will be put in harm’s way, although claims of possible Iranian plans for retaliation cast doubt on that hope. But regardless, innocent Syrians will still be killed by American missiles. People’s homes and possessions will still be destroyed. Mass aggressive violence will still be waged by the US government in a foreign land. That’s a war.

And while Kerry is not currently proposing sending ground troops to Syria, he acknowledges that it’s a possibility. Kerry also told the Senate: “But in the event Syria imploded, for instance, or in the event there was a threat of a chemical weapons cache falling into the hands of al-Nusra or someone else and it was clearly in the interest of our allies and all of us, the British, the French and others, to prevent those weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of the worst elements, I don’t want to take off the table an option that might or might not be available to a president of the United States to secure our country.”

But to be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war.

So, why the Orwellian “War is Peace” attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When explaining that he would not consider American attacks on Syria a war, Kerry went a step further and said “when people are asked, do you want to go to war with Syria, of course not! Everybody, a hundred percent of Americans will say no.”  When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.

But this attitude makes sense for another reason: The state wants to conceal the truth about its wars. This is why it employs so many Newspeak terms when discussing war. Murdering civilians becomes “collateral damage.” Any military age male killed by an American drone strike is automatically labeled a “militant.” And a war against Syria becomes not war but “an action that can degrade the capacity of a man who’s been willing to kill his own people by breaking a nearly hundred-year- old prohibition.”

The U.S. government doesn’t want you to know the truth about their wars. This is why Chelsea Manning is in prison for blowing the whistle on war crimes, including an attack in which “U.S. troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an airstrike to destroy the evidence.” It’s why the military denied for years that they used white phosphorus, a chemical weapon, in Fallujah.

This rampant dishonesty is precisely why we should never trust them when they want to go to war. Especially when they refuse to call war by its name.

Latest Commentary
- The Impulsiveness of US Power
- A Major Win For The Opponents of The 'War On Drugs'
- 33 Heroes Are Possibly Dead and No One Cares Because They Aren't Cops
- This Has Become Routine
- I Wish Nobody Was Bombing Syria
- 'Neutralizing' John Lennon: One Man Against The 'Monster'
- The Menace of Egalitarianism
- College Campuses Are Not Gun-Free Zones

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sep 09 2013, 12:19 PM

80202 Particularly galling too is Obamas statement that we want to "send a shot across the bow" of Syria.
Such a nice phrase....brings up images of ships in the colonial times shooting over the bow (note: not actually to HIT anything, or even cause damage, it's a warning shot) but that isn't what they are talking about actually doing.

If you look up "a just war" and the requirements for it, you find even if MORALLY correct to "do something" there has to be a good reason to expect success, a positive outcome. I see no chance of that happening if we bomb. Hegemony and hubris have gotten so large, if anyone fired a missile into another country, that would always be seen as an act of war.

Countries ought to adopt the doctors oath, "first do no harm", as in even if it seems right don't make matter worse and cause even more suffering.

Posted: Sep 09 2013, 3:52 PM

"This rampant dishonesty is precisely why we should never trust them when they want to go to war." - Nathan Goodman

"This rampant dishonesty is precisely why we should never trust them," would have been enough said. They lie from every direction. The war is merely the end-result of those lies. Erasing history, or, the people who could refute "presented history," is part of their objective. In the case of Syria, the war is both, erasing history, and, establishing a (new) dictatorship.

"One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship." - Orwell "1984"

Posted: Sep 09 2013, 10:21 PM

65110 Nice 1984 quote, fits perfectly with the "regime change" doctrine

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

The Mystery of ISIS' Toyota Army Solved - 10/0916-Yr-Old & His Mom Tazed & Arrested After Boy's Waving at Cop Deemed 'Suspicious' - 10/09Julian Assange: 'Snowden, I and Kim Dotcom All Assigned Same Prosecutor in Virginia' - 10/09Chief Defends 'Good Cop' Who Pepper-Sprayed Man For No Reason as He Walked Down The Street - 10/09Man Arrested On Felony Drug Charge as Revenge For Lawsuit - 10/08Scamming Cop Busted Mailing Traffic Tickets to Innocent People - 10/09Once More: The TPP Agreement Is Not a Free Trade Agreement, It's a Protectionist Anti-Free Trade Agreement - 10/09US Defense Secretary Predicts Terror Attacks On Russia - 10/09

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up