The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Apr 11 2013, 2:37 AM Category: Commentary Source: Independent Institute Print

Legalize Recreational Drugs

By Randall Holcombe, The Beacon

I suspect that most readers of The Beacon tend to favor personal freedoms to a sufficient degree that they will immediately agree with the title of this post. If we want to live in a free country, freedom has to mean that we are free to make choices that others, including others in positions of authority, believe are bad choices. We are not free if we are only allowed to choose options government believes are good for us.

The tremendous harm that the war on drugs has around the world is common knowledge. It destabilizes and corrupts governments. The governments in Columbia, Guatemala, Mexico, Afghanistan, and many other places are corrupt and less functional because they have been pressured to adopt US drug policies. I suspect that even libertarian anarchists would argue that the citizens of those countries would be better off without the corrupting influence of US drug laws than with them. It has a similar corrupting effect in the US, as do all victimless crimes, although the US has not suffered as much as have many other countries forced to conform to our policies.

The war on drugs endangers innocent citizens because those involved in the drug trade are not protected by government, so they must arm themselves to protect their property and their business from law enforcement, and other private citizens. The violence that accompanies illegal drugs is present because they are illegal, not because they are drugs.

Users themselves are placed in more danger, because there is less quality control in underground markets, and because there is a premium placed on creating more potent, and therefore more portable and concealable, products.

Another obvious drawback is that violating drug laws can land the user in prison. This is obviously bad for the person who is imprisoned, but it is bad for everyone else too. It marginalizes that individual, making it less likely the individual can find a good job, and more likely that after incarceration the individual will engage in criminal activity. Everyone would be better off if we kept drug users out of prison.

So, why do we have these laws? One reason is that some people believe that if a certain behavior is undesirable (like using drugs), then it should be illegal. Another more utilitarian reason is that drug laws may keep some people from becoming drug users. If recreational drugs were legalized, some people who donít use them now might start.

Letís look at this argument more closely. To summarize all of what Iíve said already, US drug laws are bad for just about everybody around the world. They make governments more corrupt and make life more dangerous both in the US and abroad, and they impose potentially heavy costs on users. The advantage is that it may keep people from becoming users.

If we want to live in a free country, this argument fails because the ďadvantageĒ amounts to taking away individual freedoms. Creating a more totalitarian society is not an advantage.

Even if using recreational drugs is in some ways harmful to the drug user, in a free country it should be up to the potential user to weigh the costs and benefits, not the government.

In an attempt to protect some people from making choices that others might view as harmful, we are inflicting harm on everyone else around the world.

Freedom is meaningless unless people have the freedom to make poor choices. If we apply that principle to our drug laws, recreational drugs will be legalized, and the harm that is done by our drug laws to innocent people all over the world will be eliminated.

Eliminating harm is good. Promoting individual freedom furthers the American values upon which this country was founded.

Latest Commentary
- Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government
- Let's Talk About...The Plague
- With Mass Shootings, The State Makes Us Less Safe
- Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'
- Fear Is The Name of The Game
- This Thanksgiving, Let's Say 'No Thanks' to The Tyranny of The American Police State
- Donald Trump's Presidential "Heel Turn"
- Katniss Vs. Power: The Lessons of Hunger Games

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Apr 11 2013, 10:15 AM

7630 As long as your idea of "legalization" means absolutley no "laws" about marijuana at all, then I can agree with you. Please, do not alow any lawmaker the ability to "settle" a moral decision for anyone.

Posted: Apr 11 2013, 5:52 PM

173242 Ever seen "THX-1138" or "Brave New World"?

Posted: Apr 12 2013, 1:02 AM

21619 The drug war was never meant to eliminate harm. Drug laws, at least in this country, originated to facilitate the oppression of minorities. The drug war was invented as an excuse to put more people, particularly black people, in prison. Some people seem to believe that, somewhere along the way, a system of punitive laws, enforced through violence, magically turned into a warm fuzzy campaign to reduce drug use. A war is a war. You don't wage war on people to help them.

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving - 11/30Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government - 11/30The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance - 11/30Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement - 11/30Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department - 11/30Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27New Photos Show Chicago Cops On Burger King CPU Where Laquan McDonald Shooting Footage 'Disappeared' - 12/01LA to Scan All Cars, Publicly Shame Anyone Who Drives Through a 'Prostitution Area' - 11/30

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up