Beretta Tells Maryland It Will Move Operation If Gun Law is Enacted
Beretta USA, the domestic division of the Italian firearms manufacturer, recently informed Maryland it will move operations out of the state if a law aimed at the Second Amendment is enacted. "Enact such measures at your own risk," the company told lawmakers, according to Bizpac Review.
Beretta’s ARX-160, developed for the Italian armed forces and now in commercial prototype, would be outlawed by the pending legislation. Photo: Defense Review.
Jeff Reh, a member of the Board of Directors for Beretta U.S.A. Corp., told lawmakers the company opposes Maryland Senate bill 281, otherwise known as the Firearm Safety Act of 2013.
The law proposes "altering" how the Second Amendment is interpreted in the state and would outlaw so-called assault weapons and prohibit "a person from transporting an assault weapon into the State or possessing, selling, offering to sell, transferring, purchasing, or receiving an assault weapon." Under the law, "certain individuals" would be ordered "to surrender firearms… under certain circumstances." In addition, the law would force handgun owners to obtain a "handgun qualification license" from the Secretary of State Police.
Beretta’s ARX-160, developed for the Italian armed forces as part of the Soldato Futuro (Future Soldier) program and now in commercial prototype, would be outlawed by the pending legislation.
In a letter to lawmakers, Beretta’s Jeff Reh said legislation proposed by Gov. Martin O'Malley will "treat as dangerous millions of people who lawfully and safely own semi-automatic rifles and the tens of millions of people who lawfully and safely own magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. It tells those people that you can protect your life, your family or your business, even against multiple assailants, as long as you can get do so in 10 rounds or less. It tells all of these people that in Maryland there is a limit on the extent to which you can exercise your 2nd Amendment rights, a limit that does not apply, by the way, to police officers who buy these products for the same protective reasons that are desired by the general public."
The Washington Post reports politicians in Maryland fear the company will take their business elsewhere. "I'm concerned. I think they're going to move," said Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., a Democrat. "They sell guns across the world and in every state in the union -- to places a lot more friendly to the company than this state."
On Saturday, we covered a growing number of firearm companies announcing they will no longer sell products to states, counties and municipalities engaged in subversion against the Constitution.
"There are some states, counties, cities, and municipalities in our great nation that fail to allow their citizens to fully exercise their right to keep and bear arms with restrictions such as magazine capacity or types of firearms that are widely available to citizens of other states, counties, cities, and municipalities," The Police Loophole reported. "However, these government entities do not place these restrictions upon their own employees, such as police officers."
- Bill Introduced To Repeal Patriot Act And Prevent The Government From Demanding Encryption Backdoors
- New Mexico Legislature Abolishes Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Cops in Colorado Could Soon Face $15,000 Fines if they Try to Stop People from Filming
- Good Cop Fired for Stopping Fellow Cop from Beating a Mentally Ill Man, Gets her Job Back!
- State Law that Legalized Self Defense Against Cops Just Got Man's Conviction Overturned
- Historic Federal Bill to Legalize Medical Marijuana Rolled Out Today
- Vet Facing Life Sentence Found Not Guilty for Aiming Pistol at Cops Who Failed to Identify as Cops
- Jury Acquits Hollywood Man Who Said He Grew Pot Because He Medically Needed It
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.