A Rejoinder to the RonPaul.com Affairby James E. MillerFeb. 15, 2013 |
Patriot ACT on Steroids: FISA Bill Forces 'An Enormous Range' of Businesses to Act as NSA Spies
John Hagee Cheers Israel-Iran Battle as 'Gog and Magog War,' Will Lobby Congress Not to Deescalate
Telegram Founder Changed Mind on Setting Up Shop in San Francisco After Being Robbed Leaving Twitter HQ
Israel to Extend Water Agreement With Jordan 'For Helping Shoot Down Iranian Drones'
MSNBC's Joy Reid Celebrates Prosecution of Trump as Racial Revenge Against Whitey
Sorry, but ICANN is hardly "private," it's a government granted monopoly with no competition, it's rules are reflective of the statist framework which it was created by and operates under. As a result, many of their rules are idiotic and antithetical to free markets, these trademark ones are case in point. - ChrisIn light of new facts previously unknown to me, the affair over ownership of RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org turns out to be more complicated than I originally considered. These warrant a written response -as does Robert Wenzel’s rebuttal to my criticism of his “designed” rights theory. Read More |