informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Dec 24 2012, 3:35 PM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: The Newspaper Print

Utah: Traffic Stop Valid Even When Cop Causes Violation

Federal judge upholds stop for a left-lane violation even when presence of cop car caused traffic to slow.

A police officer can pull over a motorist for a traffic violation even if the officer himself caused the driver to commit the infraction, a federal judge ruled last Tuesday. US District Judge Ted Stewart made the decision in the case of Hickory W. McCoy, who was pulled over on January 24, 2012 while traveling just under the speed limit in the left lane of Interstate 80 in Utah.

Highway Patrol Trooper Randy Riches was running a speed trap on the side of the road, about 150 feet from where the speed limit drops from 75 MPH to 65 MPH. Just before noon, McCoy's rented 2011 Chevrolet Malibu passed by at a legal 73 MPH. Riches pulled onto the highway and began racing after the Malibu at 88 MPH, hoping to catch it speeding. Instead, as he followed for a mile and a half, the Malibu was driving a legal 62 MPH in the left lane. Another vehicle was passing in the right lane at the time.

Trooper Riches pulled over the Malibu on the grounds that it was blocking traffic in the left lane. Under Utah law, it is unlawful to dawdle in the fast lane, blocking faster traffic, unless "avoiding actual or potential traffic" in the right-hand lane. McCoy's attorney, Randall Gaither, said the trooper was the one driving dangerously.

"The Highway Patrol officer drove at an excessive speed of over 88 miles per hour with no lights or siren down the Interstate in the right lane of travel pursuing the vehicle without any observation of a traffic offense," Gaither told the court. "The vehicle was driven in an aggressive manner without any emergency exception. The position and manner of driving by the patrol unit would have reasonably affected the drivers on the roadway. The trooper began following the vehicle and restricted the movement of the vehicle into the right lane... The only clear traffic violation is the excessive speed of the patrol vehicle driving and passing cars in the right lane."

In court, Trooper Riches asserted the Malibu had room to get into the right lane, even though the patrol car was approaching 25 MPH faster than the rest of traffic on the road.

"Even accepting as true defendant's assertion that, due to the actions of Trooper Riches no violation of [the left-lane statute] occurred, the outcome is unchanged because the court finds that Trooper Riches's assessment of the facts giving rise to the violation was reasonable," Judge Stewart concluded. "In sum, the court finds that the totality of the circumstances support a finding that, at the inception of the instant traffic stop, Trooper Riches had a reasonable articulable suspicion that defendant committed a traffic violation under the laws of the state of Utah. For this reason, the court will deny defendant's motion to suppress."

As a result, McCoy will stand trial for charges for possession of marijuana and an Intratec 9mm. A copy of the judge's ruling is available in a PDF file at the source link below.

Source: US v. McCoy (US District Court, District of Utah, 12/18/2012)





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- The Matthew Townsend Case: Official Retaliation, Not "Witness Intimidation"
- Plainclothes Cop Unleashed Racist Tirade On Uber Driver In New York
- New England Cop Harasses Guy Walking Home, Gets Schooled
- Audio Released of Cop Shooting and Killing College Student for Speaking Disrespectfully
- All of the Ways Big Brother Is Watching You
- Ariz. Governor Vetoes Bill Shielding Cops' Names
- Bureaucrats Panic As Traffic Ticket Revenue Plummets Across U.S.
- Student Records Teacher Threatening Kids, Gets Suspended









Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 25 2012, 12:42 AM

Link
67164 Well there's the real reason at the end. If he didn't have the gun and the weed he would have got away with it.

Also no mention of it was legal or not for him to have the gun. I'm guessing not and the judge didn't want to see him get away with illegal search and seizure so he pulled the verdict out of his ass so he can stand trial.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 25 2012, 12:58 AM

Link
7522 It's important to understand that judge's decision was not that McCoy has committed traffic violation, but that in the eyes of the trooper, he _might_ have committed it - enough to stop him.

Even when stopped, McCoy shouldn't have consented to the search of the vehicle.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 25 2012, 5:05 AM

Link
67164 Well, it sounds like there was his problem. The guy should have said the magic words, "I do not consent to any searches" and asked if he was free to go.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 25 2012, 7:07 AM

Link
75174 Welkom to Amerika. The judges are independedent, legal scholars. Bawahahahahahahah!
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 26 2012, 1:28 AM

Link
68184 well there are many ways to get your backs in a situation like this. If cops want to play dirty then people are going to have to get dirty also.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 26 2012, 1:00 PM

Link
173242 And yet more nuttiness out of Utah. No surprise there.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 27 2012, 4:31 AM

Link
74235 They should have to mail us all the rules and regulations and constant updates in the law, it's not like everybody studies the contradicting BS anyways! Since they are always adapting it to make more money, they should at least let us all know what all the laws are!
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 30 2012, 10:21 AM

Link
65183 Courts supporting illegal cop behavoir. Seen it too many times lately. Law enforcement is out of control across the country with the courts backing them up.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 30 2012, 10:26 AM

Link
65183 In Arizona I've seen patrol cars come racing up behind motorists, then back off, then speed up to them, over and over. Finally pulling the car over because it was driving "Irratically". This also happened to my friend and she couldn't figure out what the heck was going on back there. Now she's fighting these bs tickets and it's very expensive. Didn't cost the cop a thing. In Arizona they'll do anything possible to write tickets. One traffic cam in Chandler Arizona is located where the speed drops. Nobody knows that this "red light camera" is also a speed camera. Over 17,000 tickets issued in 2010 and the camera was broken for 3 months. It's a trap! But the courts and cops don't see it that way. There are a couple hundred thousand unpaid camera tickets in Arizona. Finally they're getting rid of some of the cameras. Nobody will pay the bs tickets.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 05 2014, 5:07 AM

Link
6687 11/5/14 20 mi out of SLC got pulled over for the 3rd time that day and for the third time I did not commit any traffic or other offense and for the 3rd time I denied consent to search...only this time near SLC they still detained me and searched my vehicle all while I'm clearlry stating I do not give consent....I believe without a doubt I was profiled all 3 times because I had a nice car, which was a rental...beware of obamas police state its happening
Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Bureaucrats Panic As Traffic Ticket Revenue Plummets Across U.S. - 03/30New England Cop Harasses Guy Walking Home, Gets Schooled - 03/31The Matthew Townsend Case: Official Retaliation, Not "Witness Intimidation" - 03/31Audio Released of Cop Shooting and Killing College Student for Speaking Disrespectfully - 03/31Plainclothes Cop Unleashed Racist Tirade On Uber Driver In New York - 03/31Here Comes Italy: The Next Country to Legalize Marijuana? - 03/31State Sterilization: Alive and Well in America - 03/31Student Records Teacher Threatening Kids, Gets Suspended - 03/30

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top