informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Dec 06 2012, 2:00 AM Category: Commentary Source: Cop Block Print

Judge Illegally Orders Teenager to 10 Years of Church Attendance

by George Sand, Cop Block

Judicial immunity has been covered here on Copblock from time to time. Perhaps the most notorious and flagrantly offensive case involving judicial immunity would be Stump v. Sparkman, wherein a judge conspired with a young girlís mother to have her secretly sterilized. When she found out years later, after she was married, that she could not have children because of this, she tried to sue Judge Stump, her mother, and the physician involved. The Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed that Judge Stump was cloaked by judicial immunity, and was not subject to civil suit. Most notably, the Supreme Court majority opinion in Stump graced us all with this self-serving piece of wisdom †-
As early as 1872, the Court recognized that it was "a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, [should] be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself."
Read: for justice to be administered, judges should be free to act as they please, without consequences. Under almost any circumstances. Is this shit for real? Unfortunately, yes it is. They really do think the rest of us are that stupid. Letís have that again Ė for there to be justice, judges should be free to do whatever they want without suffering personal consequences.

Most recently, a case somewhat less heinous, but almost as bizarre as Stump emerged. A district judge in Oklahoma sentenced a 17-year-old boy to 10 years of church attendance in connection with a DUI and manslaughter charge. Judge Mike Norman gave Tyler Alred a 10-year deferred sentence for DUI manslaughter.

Norman acknowledged he did not believe his sentence would pass a legal challenge, but relies on the fact that he has done it in the past and does not believe either side will seek an appeal (more here). Ryan Kiesel, executive director of the Oklahoma chapter of the ACLU has expressed concern that the judge admitted to making an illegal decision.

To be fair, this defendant is not blameless. Further, when forced to choose, most people would easily accept 10 years of church attendance over several years in prison, which is common for manslaughter sentencing. Yet, this is certainly another example of how judges do not necessarily uphold the law. If they are so inclined, they make and enforce law as they see fit. With full judicial immunity, they are indeed very free to make up rules they like, and dispense with the ones they donít. So you may not see the big deal about making a kid go to church, but surely you should have a problem when judges go around ordering that people be sterilized without their knowledge.

These are the people tasked with upholding your legal rights. They have largely unrestrained power, and in many situations, the only thing keeping them from totally ruining peoplesí lives is their conscience. In contrast, there are many deterrents restraining ordinary people from amassing and abusing this kind of power. For instance, if a store or business provides bad service or maintains abusive practices, customers are free to leave and shop elsewhere. Many business fail and never recover for this very reason. Drivers, dentists, physicians, or businesses that are negligent and injure people can be sued for their negligence (whereas judges cannot be sued Ė even if they are not only negligent, but reckless or malicious).

The forcible monopoly maintained in the American court system (and court systems in general) would be akin to outlawing all but one grocery store, prohibiting competition, and hoping against all hope that this one monopoly of a grocery store will not hike up prices, provide bad service, and treat customers poorly.

To believe that handing over large monopolistic powers to people without restraint constitutes a functioning fair system is about as reasonable as the belief in Santa Claus or unicorns. Yet, people continue to insist that this is the best system there is, and possibly can be.

Well, I suppose Alred should be thankful that Judge Norman didnít order that he be sterilized.
_
George Sand received her B.A. from UCLA and her J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law. She enjoys beer, jogging, the beach and music in her spare time.





Latest Commentary
- The Absurdity of "Reform" in DC
- Net Neutrality: Triumph of the Ruling Class
- If You're Not "Sovereign," You're Servile
- Domestic Fear Is the Price of Empire
- The Net Neutrality Scam
- The National-Security State's ISIS Racket
- Gun Control, Death, and the Drug War
- Against Forced Vaccination









Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Amerikagulag

Posted: Dec 06 2012, 11:47 AM

Link
76193 I'm just curious if the judge specified which denomination the defendant was supposed to embrace.
dougo

Posted: Dec 06 2012, 12:54 PM

Link
688 good question,76193.physcopaths,1% of pop.,20% of prison pop.,40% cops,and higher for their superiors.
L.S.

Posted: Dec 06 2012, 2:43 PM

Link
if i were working for the state, i would see judge norman as a liability.

responding to Amerikagulag and dougo:

the pope spews the message for all churches. it's a trickle-down methodology, presented in most cases, first to catholics. sometimes however, the media sends out the message first. after one of those two firsts, the idea is then fed to jehovah'a witnesses and, within 3 weeks, it reaches the main-stream christian churches.
denomination only needs to be considered in the means to implementation.

in this case, the mother is likely baptist or something close to it. nationalist zealots usually only deviate from the religion of state, when there is something even more fascist, which will support their scewed ideology.

redirect to judge norman, whose religion needn't be clarrified, for it's clear by his vocation.

the first two responses questioned denomination, which was intentionally left unspecified in this article. now, people are going to want to know and, what happens when they start drawing parallels to the message in their own churches???? judge norman didn't consider the message implementation system when he gave this order nor, did realize what a catastrophe this could become for the controllers.

i realize this judgement was supposed to be a war construct between the two parties, but when you toy with enformy, you are subject to universal law.




John

Posted: Dec 06 2012, 2:54 PM

Link
91240 Up your judicial immunity !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwC_IaY3BmY


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Feds Raid Texas Political Meeting; Fingerprint And Photograph All Attendees, Seize Phones - 02/27Nevada Cops Pull Women From Car After Driver Refuses to Roll Window Fully Down - 03/02Cop Tases an Innocent, Non-Violent, and Unarmed Senior Citizen in a Wheelchair - 03/02Texas Town Experiences 61% Drop in Crime After Firing Their Police Department - 03/02Shock Video Emerges Of LAPD Shooting Homeless Man - 03/02'Officer Awareness' Memo: Police Accountability Recording App Could Lead To Dangerous 'Flash Mobs' - 03/02Cop Admits He Shot His Own Police Car, Wasn't "Shot At" While On Patrol - 03/02DC Police Chief: Marijuana Arrests "Make People Hate Us," Users Just Want To Relax - 03/02

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top