informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Nov 12 2012, 5:43 AM Category: Commentary Source: Wendy McElroy Print

Will the Police Protect You?

Wendy McElroy

For years, I have declared a preference for taking my chances with criminals rather than with the police. Criminals usually want my property, not to control my life or to cage me like an animal. With criminals, I can pull a gun in self-defense. Until lately, however, the average person has scowled my way whenever I voiced that preference.

The situation is changing. A tipping point in the public attitude toward law enforcement is under way… finally! A significant number of people have realized that America is either currently a police state or it is teetering on the crumbling edge to one.

Part of the sea change comes from the deliberate militarization of police departments, where tanks, drones, and SWAT teams have become standard. A military-style training, in which civilians are viewed as combatants, has deepened the antagonism of the police toward the public so that violent incidents are commonplace. Many police officers no longer bother to disguise their savagery. Police at the University of California, Davis who pepper-sprayed peaceful, seated Occupy protesters a year ago come to mind. Why should they be subtle? Their anti-terrorism mandate has erased the restraints of civil liberties.

Meanwhile, there is no oversight. The police define their own rules of conduct, police departments investigate their own misdeeds behind closed doors, and district attorneys and police unions aggressively shield the criminal acts of cops. Victims who complain are often charged with elastic crimes, such as “obstructing law enforcement,” which are later dropped in exchange for their silence.

Part of the sea change also comes from the increased use of law enforcement against children in public schools. Last May, New Mexico police officer Chris Webb was visiting a school for career day when he asked a group of young boys to wash his police car. A 10-year-old refused. According to an ensuing lawsuit against Webb and the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, the officer told the youngster, “Let me show you what happens to people who do not listen to the police.” Webb then used a Taser on him, sending 50,000 volts of electricity into the 100-pound boy’s chest. He lost consciousness. Instead of seeking medical care, however, Webb merely carried him into the principal’s office. The officer claims it was all an accident and points to his punishment — a three-day suspension — as proof the police department believes him.

The incident is not isolated. Last month, a federal civil rights lawsuit was filed against a Mississippi school district that arrests students, handcuffs them, and ships them off to youth court for minor infractions like breaking the dress code. Among the defendants are judges of the county’s youth court and the Mississippi Division of Youth Services. They are accused of violating the children’s constitutional rights through such practices as incarcerating them for days without a probable cause hearing.

The backlash goes on and on. The raw money grabs being made by police in the name of civil forfeiture have also sparked fury. Under civil forfeiture, property that was involved in a crime can be confiscated and sold by police departments. It doesn’t matter if the victims of the forfeiture have committed no crime or have never been charged with one.

On Nov. 5, for example, a pivotal civil forfeiture case commenced in Boston. Over a 20-year period, a handful of drug crimes were committed in a motel owned by Russ Caswell and his wife; the “crime scenes” represented about 0.05% of their total rentals. Nevertheless, the federal government and the local police department are attempting to take the Caswells’ $1 million motel and split the proceeds. Ironically, the money grab arose because the Caswells themselves reported suspicious activity.

These and other factors, including the rise of YouTube videos that capture police brutality, contribute to the discomfort with which average people are beginning to view the police.

The importance of this change cannot be overstated.

Years ago, I interviewed several dozen sex workers and surveyed about 200 more for the purpose of writing a book about the realities of the “profession.” The women expressed one political attitude over and over: They did not trust the police, the courts, or any aspect of law enforcement. They recognized the legal system for what it is — an enemy. From visceral experience, the women knew law enforcement as a corrupt system that brutalizes harmless people and criminalizes peaceful acts.

Their attitude was refreshing. The single greatest obstacle over which I used to stumble in arguing for fundamental legal change was the inculcated belief that the police were there “to serve and protect.”

I argued in vain that the police have no duty whatsoever to protect people from criminals; that’s not their job description. The courts have been clear on this point for over a century. In 1856, the U.S. Supreme Court (South v. Maryland) found that law enforcement officers had no responsibility to protect anyone. Their duty was to enforce the law in general. More recently, in 1982 (Bowers v. DeVito), the 7th U.S. Court of Appeals held that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Later court decisions concur.

Police vehicles often sport slogans like “Proud to serve!” If they aren’t there to protect you, the question becomes who are they serving? The courts have answered: Police departments exist to enforce the law. The police serve the government, not the people. They uphold the law with total disregard for whether their actions create or prevent violence. If government decides that certain forms of consent between adults must not be tolerated, then the police will draw their guns and barge into otherwise peaceful situations. To uphold an unjust law, they will create violence and victims.

To understand the reality that the police are not there for you is an extremely valuable piece of information. If you are depending on them to protect you, to guard you against real crime, to stop intruders or muggers and to prosecute after the fact, you have been sorely misled.

Every citizen who wants to be free must prepare for his or her own defense against violence. The market is there to assist with security services, alarm systems, property monitoring devices, ever more sophisticated locks, and, of course, guns of all sorts. In the end, we are responsible for our own security. The state will not come to your rescue. On the contrary, it is the market that provides the means by which we are rescued from the state.
_
Wendy McElroy is Author, lecturer, and freelance writer, and a senior associate of the Laissez Faire Club.





Latest Commentary
- Let the Market Contain Ebola
- The State as a Royal Scam
- Glenn Greenwald TED Talk: Why Privacy Matters
- "Crush the Seed of Ishmael": A "Final Solution" to the "Muslim Problem"
- The State Has No Right To Do Anything
- Will the CDC Save Us From Ebola?
- Left and Right Agree: War Is Popular
- What the Feds and Bernie Madoff Have in Common









Comments 1 - 7 of 7 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 12 2012, 8:23 AM

Link
6752 More people need to read this.

More people need to understand that police only decrease freedom without an increase in security. In the last few years, I have realized this. I often carry multiple arms with me to protect myself, my family and other peace loving individuals. Unfortunately, the reality is I will probably be forced to use those arms against illegal use of force by the police.

Fortunately, in my state, there is law written that give citizen the right to use deadly force against police officers that use their fake authority in a violent manner against peaceful citizens. I pray I'll never be in that situation, but, officers that ready this, bear in mind this:

If you are doing something unlawful under the guise of your authority as a police officer, I often carry arms that are unaffected by bullet proof vests. Choose your actions lawfully and wisely.
dougo

Posted: Nov 12 2012, 10:45 AM

Link
687 kill the wabbit.kill the wabbit! elmer fudd
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 14 2012, 2:12 AM

Link
69131 In 2006 while a Detective on the Milwaukee Police Department I blew the whistle on detectives stealing overtime, of course nothing was charged and it was called a loophole. The public was never informed of what happened and it was all covered up. The FBI came into my neighborhood solicted my neighbors for anything they could use to retaliate against me. My residence was surrounded by cameras which I believe are fed into a local fusion center I was intentionally harassed by the neighbors for YEARS regarding things as simple as looking out my windows. When I call the police for assistance I'm treated like I'm delusional or a second class citizen where I'm just brushed off. The FBI keeps trying to get me charged with something but so far their efforts to frame me have been unsuccessful. As I travel around the interior of my residence I get struck in the head by some sort of pressure creating devices these devices are possibly ultrasonic in nature and described in the website www.hightechharassment.com If you can get out of this country do it the local police department, fbi and dhs are corrupt as hell.
Chris

Posted: Nov 14 2012, 2:59 AM

Link
To Anon 69131,

Please stop spamming the same message over and over. If what you're saying is true, why don't you just move? Leave the country for Mexico or elsewhere where you'll be left alone, if you keep thinking everyone is out to get you there then you're probably just paranoid. No doubt living in "the land of the free" can make you that way. Maybe in a freer country you'd feel a lot better, and there certainly wouldn't be anyone beaming any energy weapons at you. Also if you're calling the police "for assistance" you probably are delusional, the police are only there to rob you and/or kill you "in the name of the law."
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 14 2012, 9:48 AM

Link
69131 My point is the get the word out there to spread information on the method of operation of these people. They want people to believe this isnt happening so those targeted dont get any help, this is what the Federal and local law enforcement agencies are doing to anyone who tries to hold them accountable it may come to your neighborhood next. Believe me, if it comes to your neighborhood you'll be trying to get the word out too.
Chris

Posted: Nov 14 2012, 10:40 AM

Link
I'd leave the neighborhood ASAP, then the state, then the country. Heck, I haven't been subject to any such harassment and I'm intent on leaving the country! Is there some reason you're not moving?
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 22 2012, 4:37 AM

Link
9885 I think we all know the real answer to the question! Since we do know the right answer, maybe now the funds going to those ruthless lying ass murderers will go to something more honorable with meaning, and not wasted on petty endless lawsuits. Fundamentalism will be our next step away from this tryannic rule!
Comments 1 - 7 of 7 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Video: Cop Arrests Subway Performer For Singing, Despite Cop Reading Aloud Rule Saying It's Permitted - 10/20Police Officer Blames Everyone Else But Police Officers For The Public's General Distrust Of Law Enforcement - 10/21Chicago Cops Loot Taxpayers For Settlement After Beating Woman During Raid; Video 'May Inflame Jury' - 10/2133 Police Officers Fire 600 Bullets into Car Knowing It Contained a Hostage - 10/21South Carolina Town Ordered to Pay Nearly $100,000 for Hiring Cop with Troubled Past who Ended up Killing Mayor - 10/21Washington DC Metro Police Also Have A Stingray And Have Been Using It To Do Normal Police Work - 10/21Apple May Want To Protect Your Phone Data From Snooping, But It's Snarfing Up Your Local Desktop Searches - 10/21Video Shows Officer Coaxing Friendly Pets Closer With Kissing Noises Before Opening Fire - 10/20

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top