Jury Nullifies in "NJ Weedman" Marijuana Trial

by Phillip Smith

A Burlington County, New Jersey, jury acquitted longtime marijuana legalization and First Amendment gadfly Ed Forchion, better known as the NJ Weedman, on charges he possessed marijuana with the intent to distribute Thursday after he told jurors he needed marijuana for medicine and that they had the right to vote to acquit him despite the facts in the case.

The facts in the case seemed like a slam-dunk for the prosecution. The Weedman got caught with a pound of pot in his car after being stopped by a state trooper two years ago in Mount Holly and admitted it. People caught with that amount of marijuana (and even much smaller amounts) are routinely charged -- and convicted -- of possession with intent to distribute.

During the three-day trial, Assistant Prosecutor Michael Luciano told the jury New Jersey law prohibited the possession of large amounts of marijuana and it should easily convict Forchion. "It's straightforward," Luciano said.

But Forchion, who now resides in California and holds a California medical marijuana card, argued that the state's marijuana laws conflicted with its medical marijuana law, which was approved before he was arrested.

The Weedman ran into trouble with Superior Court Judge Charles Delehey, though, when he brought up jury nullification -- the argument that jurors are free to vote as they wish despite the facts in the case. When Forchion brought up jury nullification, Delehey stopped him, warning that he could be held in criminal contempt if he continued. Delehey also told jurors they were to decide the case only on the facts, not on what they think of the law.

In his summation, prosecutor Luciano echoed the judge, asking jurors to not use their verdict to show their "opinion on the war on drugs."

The jury deliberated for two hours before coming back with a unanimous not guilty verdict.

"I'm not a weirdo anymore, I'm a hero," a jubilant Weedman told supporters and reporters after the verdict. "Other patients should start using the Weedman defense."

The case was a retrial. In his original trial stemming from the traffic stop, the jury convicted him of simple marijuana possession, but was unable to reach a verdict on the more serious charge of possession with intent to distribute. Forchion said he will appeal the possession conviction.

Forchion's courtroom antics also included telling the jury he was eating marijuana-infused cookies while he delivered his summation and asking Judge Delehey to order his "medicine" returned in the case of a not guilty verdict. Delehey refused, saying it was "contraband."

Prosecutors had no comment after the jury's decision.

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Resistance
- Adam Kokesh Released, Felony Charges Reduced to Citations
- Rand Paul RIPS Colleagues For 'Berating' Apple Over Taxes. Congress Should Be On Trial
- Rep. Cohen Tears Into AG Holder On Marijuana
- Aaron Swartz's Last Project: Open Source System To Securely & Anonymously Submit Documents To The Press
- Stateless Citizens: Americans renounce citizenship over 'unfair' taxation & policies
- Glenn Greenwald Exposes Bill Maher's Hypocrisy On Muslims & American Exceptionalism
- Adam Kokesh on CBS DC WUSA9
- Disease and The Drive to Hide with Stefan Molyneux and Jeffrey Tucker

Comments 1 - 3 of 3

Add Comment

Page 1 of 1

Peter

Posted: Oct 24 2012, 4:45 AM

Link

81161

Congratulations to Weedman on his acquittal .

My sympathy goes to the many who are not fortunate enough to get a jury made up of decent folks with functioning brains and thus get convicted for the non-'crime' of smoking a weed !

Nullification is great IF it is followed by a change of law .

Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2012, 9:32 AM

Link

10756

Congratulations to the jurors!

Heather

Posted: Oct 28 2012, 12:44 AM

Link

76103

Congratulations and many thanks to the jury who stood up for liberty!
Not so much to the writer of this article, who bias is quite evident. "Antics", indeed! The Weedman was standing up for his rights, and his medicine should, indeed, be returned to him. If it was a Big Pharma drug, it would be. Weed isn't cheap and insurance doesn't cover it.

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy