informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Sep 27 2012, 8:45 AM Category: Commentary Source: William Norman Grigg Print

The Sacred Cause of "Officer Safety"

by William Norman Grigg

“It’s just about being safe.”

Thus spoke Deputy Corry Bassett of the Lincoln County, Wyoming Sheriff’s Office as he struggled to justify handcuffing Robert Pierson during an August 11, 2011 traffic stop.

Pierson, a Marine combat veteran, had been riding his motorcycle near Alpine when another motorist called to complain about a biker passing a number of slow-moving motor homes. Pierson was not charged with a traffic violation or a criminal offense -- but he was arrested and detained in handcuffs for 45 minutes because the sight of a Mundane carrying a firearm caused Bassett to irrigate his underwear.

“I know you have a gun,” Bassett said a few seconds into the stop, which was recorded on Pierson’s cell phone. “Are you a cop?”

When Pierson indicated that he was not part of the armed revenue-extracting caste, Bassett muttered: “OK, what I’m going to do is – put your hands behind your back right now.”

As he handcuffed the compliant motorist, Bassett explained, “I don’t like someone with a gun,” while insisting, “You’re not under arrest.”

The second statement is an unalloyed lie: Whenever a police officer restrains someone, that person is under arrest. The first statement is a lie by omission: If Pierson had been a police officer, Bassett would not have complained about him carrying a gun. The category of “someone” thus applies only to Mundanes, whose very existence is seen as a threat to the unimaginably precious personages who wear state-issued costumes.

“It’s the first thing you should have told me, [that] you’ve got a gun,” simpered Bassett, whose panic-tinged voice was thrown into sharp relief by Pierson’s composure.

“Well, actually I’m not required to tell you in either Idaho or Wyoming,” Pierson correctly pointed out.

“Yes, you are,” insisted Bassett. “If you’re packing a gun, I want to know about it.”

“Well, I’m open-carrying,” Pierson observed, stating the obvious. As Bassett began a rote speech describing the sacred imperative of “officer safety,” Pierson pointed out that he had done nothing wrong or illegal, that the deputy’s safety “is not in any way in jeopardy," and that actually “it’s not my concern.”

“It is!” yelped Bassett. “It’s my concern!”

“My only concern is my personal rights and individual liberties, which you are violating right now,” noted Pierson.

“No, I am not,” Bassett lied.

“You have me handcuffed,” Pierson reminded the increasingly petulant officer.

“I handcuffed you for [sic] number one, you did not tell me you had a gun on you, ‘kay?” Bassett groused. “You do not get off your bike and face me, and I see a weapon on you! I don’t like that!”

“You asked me if I could get off my bike, and you said `yes,’” recounted Pierson.

“I understand your concerns about search and seizure, but you have to understand one thing about where we’re at in law enforcement,” stated Bassett. “I’m asking you for my safety. I don’t know you. I don’t know your intentions.”

The same could have been said by Pierson about Bassett, who was, after all, just another armed stranger. One critical difference, of course, is that Pierson knew that Bassett’s intentions were malign: After all, the deputy had detained him, which is an act of aggression by any definition.

Recall that when Bassett noted that Pierson had a gun, his first question was: “Are you a cop?” If Pierson had been a fellow member of the Brotherhood of Official Plunder, this would have allayed Bassett’s concerns.

In fact, after noticing that Pierson carried a military ID, Bassett suggested that the detainee should see the encounter in terms of “force security” in a battle zone.

“You’re in the military,” Bassett began. “You ever been shot at? Would you like, if you roll up on somebody you have no idea who they are … wouldn’t it be a question in your mind if this person’s got weapons on them?”

Bassett, who never served in the military, clearly saw himself as part of an army of occupation – and insisted on unqualified submission to his supposed authority.

“Your safety does not trump my right and my liberty,” Pierson tutored the deputy.

“When I stop you, yes it does,” asserted Bassett.

“Your personal safety is more important than all the laws, the Constitution, and every one of my personal rights and liberties,” summarized Pierson, his voice heavy with disgusted incredulity.

“When I’m in a traffic stop, yes,” declared Bassett. “I’m in control of this situation.”

“The Constitution is in control of this situation,” Pierson rejoined.

“No – I am… and if I feel that I’m going to be threatened by the fact that you have a gun on your side, by hell I’m gonna do it,” concluded Bassett.

Forty-five minutes later, Deputy Rob Andazola arrived to provide “backup.” At that point, as Bassett has admitted in a sworn deposition, the deputies offered to unshackle Pierson if he allowed Andazola to draw his weapon and shoot the motorcyclist in the event he made any gesture perceived as a “threat.”

Pierson didn’t agree to those terms. Eventually a patrol supervisor reached the scene and acknowledged that the motorcyclist had done nothing wrong. Until that happened, however, Pierson was handcuffed, disarmed, and entirely at the mercy of two armed strangers who considered it their right – if not their duty – to kill him if he displayed any behavior that made them uneasy.



“I didn’t know whether kicking my leg over the bike, or walking away, or what they could possibly constitute as a hostile act,” Pierson told the Associated Press. “And I was a little unnerved by the fact that they were threatening lethal force with a deadly weapon against a man who was compliant, in handcuffs, who had been screened.”

In the sacred cause of “officer safety,” no precaution is excessive, no imposition unjustified – and no constitutional “guarantee” of individual rights is binding.

Pierson’s legitimate concern for citizen safety in the presence of police is underscored by an incident that occurred near Canton, Ohio just weeks before the traffic stop in Wyoming.

On June 8, 2011, Patrolman Daniel Harless of the Canton, Ohio Police Department, repeatedly threatened to murder the driver, William E. Bartlett, for carrying a concealed handgun for which he had obtained the appropriate permit.

At all times, Bartlett was composed and cooperative. He made every effort to comply with the Ohio concealed carry ordinance by notifying Harless that he was carrying a weapon, and displaying his concealed carry license. He was rewarded with a profane outburst in which Harless made it clear that he was eager for a chance to kill somebody.

“As soon as I felt your gun I should have took [sic] two steps back, pulled my Glock 40 and just put 10 bullets in your ass and let you drop,” ranted Harless. “And I wouldn’t have lost any sleep.”

After threatening to “put lumps on” a witness to the incident, Harless told Bartlett, “I’m so close to caving in your f*****g head…. You’re just a stupid human being…. F*****g talking to me with a f*****g gun. You want me to pull mine and stick it to your head?”

Unlike Harless, who was obviously deranged, Bassett and Andazola did not dissolve into puddles of psychotic rage. But lurking behind their veneer of “professionalism” was a willingness to commit homicide simply because the sight of a Mundane with a firearm made them feel kind of funny.

When contacted by Pro Libertate to comment on the case, Captain John Steztenbach of the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office explained that “Our lawyer has told us that we are to say absolutely nothing about this case. I would love nothing more that for the other side of the story to be told, and we’re very frustrated that we can’t tell it, but it’s been made clear that until this goes to court, we’re not to comment on any aspect of this case.”

Stetzenbach, a courteous and well-spoken Connecticut native, explained that the gag order applies not only to the details of Pierson’s arrest, but also to any discussion of the department’s instructions and guidelines dealing with matters of “officer safety.” After describing how he had come to the Rocky Mountain West to study at a gunsmith trade school in Colorado, Stetzenbach proclaimed that both he and the department he serves are “very pro-Second Amendment,” and promised that when the legal issues are settled he will be very eager to “tell the whole story.”


What about "citizen safety"? Deranged Fed threatens to murder a citizen over a protest sign.

“It always amazes me how in situations like this, one side gets out very quickly, and it’s not ours; that’s really frustrating,” Stetzenbach complained.

In this case – as in other “situations” of its kind – the officers have themselves to blame for the fact that the public hasn’t seen “their side” of the story, since the dashcam recordings of the encounter have mysteriously disappeared.

The victim documented the incident, and the chief assailant has confirmed all of the victim’s key assertions. Res ipsa loquitir.

In his sworn deposition (as paraphrased by the AP), Bassett admitted that he had been “trained to put his personal safety above the rights of a citizen openly carrying a handgun.”

“We’re told every day, our safety is first,” Bassett pointed out. “We’re here to come home every night.”

Remember that admission next time you’re told that the police are here to protect and serve the public.
_
William Norman Grigg [send him mail] publishes the Pro Libertate blog and hosts the Pro Libertate radio program.





Latest Commentary
- Drug-War Nonsense from a U.S. Commander
- High Priestess Ginsburg Rebukes the Heathen
- Yes, Obama is a Tyrant, Just Like His Predecessor
- Commerce is Civilization; Government is Barbarism
- Springsteen? Mellencamp? Creedence? Heretics All!
- What Exactly Is 'Racism'?
- All Hail the Heroic Bootlegger -- Exemplar of the American Spirit
- Inside the Belly of the Beast for Sunday Service









Comments 1 - 14 of 14 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dougo

Posted: Sep 27 2012, 11:32 AM

Link
687 typical brainwashed,myopic,pigs!follow the constitution,it works.cops get the respect they earned.
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 27 2012, 8:46 PM

Link
68119 It is our duty to fight these violations of our rights any where and every where they occur. The cops safety is not more important than my safety. He/they are the problem. The people are the solution.
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 28 2012, 7:26 AM

Link
64228 If peace officers were willing and able to protect and serve the public and the Constitution, i suspect fewer citizens would feel the need to be armed for their defence.
Beyond that i think Robert Peel's rules for policing should be taught:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peelian_Principles
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 28 2012, 8:59 AM

Link
18477 This is why cities always go outside their area to bring in police chiefs - so citizens will have no clout, and this kind of tyrannical behaviour goes unpunished, condoned, even. If the police chief were a local guy, he would be more influencable, and maybe put some breaks on these out-of-control cops.
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 29 2012, 8:35 PM

Link
24148 I'd feel a lot safer if every last white, black, hispanic, asian, teenager, adult, elderly, goodie two shoes, scofflaw, miscreant and felon were ALL armed, rather than some tiny minority of pompous, petulant and ultimately petrified costumed and badge wearing children that we have as putative "authorities" today.
OhioRiver

Posted: Oct 10 2012, 9:04 PM

Link
68235 Yes, it's always about our 'safety' as they learned from Nazi Germany in 1933.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 12:12 AM

Link
70242 The Founders warned against 'rogue militias'. They never dreamed that rogue militias would be institutionalized and funded by unconstitutional taxes on citizens. Our Constitution calls for a 'well regulated militia'. The noun is singular indicating one large militia incorporating all citizens.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 1:48 PM

Link
87171 Soon or latter they will make perfect target with their uniform , when civil war number two will start , then they will have to wear diapers
People will say , Eh Bob , a many did you bag to day Oh i did get one deer and two pigs , one of them was full of donuts .
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 1:54 PM

Link
87171 Is an old say from the Latin language
SPOLIATIS ARMA SUPERSUNT
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 2:12 PM

Link
87171 Those cops are the mercenary of the wealthy , they are toth we the people are the enemy's .Frankly who want to be a cops if you have an IQ above 65, !! that where the problem lay at the roots .
They are over pay and very offen lazy , they gang up against whom they dont like , and allway's like cats cover their shit . They have become parasites , so the logic want , treated them for what they are parasites
TIinCA

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 3:15 PM

Link
7620 I think the cops knew damn well that Mr. Pierson was on the right side of the law in this case. The real purpose, I believe, was to create a psychological firewall in Mr. Pierson and all those who would agree with him against doing the same.
Robert Gamboe

Posted: Oct 11 2012, 6:19 PM

Link
216160 A paranoid person with a gun is dangerous, no matter who they are. If the police here in the U.S. continue to behave this way, they will be despised as much as the police in Mexico are.

Gone are the days when the police were considered the friends and allies of law-abiding citizens.

The Founders declared independence from Britain because of such tyrannical abuses.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 12 2012, 9:46 PM

Link
69209 It always amazes me when people who are attacked and intimidated by the police immediately engage in highly philosophical discussions with their attackers.

"OK officer, am I under arrest or free to go?" really, really should be the only phrase there. OK, you have handcuffed me, now what?

Anything else only creates additional opportunities for the officer to make up the charge and actually put you in prison - which is the whole and the only point and purpose of his encounter with you. The reason he is talking to you is not to educate you about his values, it's to create the probable cause for the arrest. He is talking to you only because he does not see that cause yet, but you give him an extra chance every time you open your mouth.
Ken

Posted: Oct 14 2012, 10:09 PM

Link
75177 Thousands of men have died for American freedom. Those men did not feel that their personal safety was more important than freedom or the U.S. Constitution.

Now we have gangs of armed thugs roaming the countryside telling us exactly that.

They think that nothing in this country, not you, your wife, your children or even freedom itself is worth more than their precious hide.

Unbelievable.

-Ken
Http://www.LaserGuidedLoogie.com
Comments 1 - 14 of 14 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

SWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong Home - 07/25Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's Life - 07/28Cops Beat This Father of Three to the Point of Hospitalization. 'Oh Sorry Wrong Guy' - 07/28Illinois Cop Shoots Dog In Its Yard In Front Of 6-Year-Old Girl - 07/28Florida Man Killed in Drug Bust Gun Battle - 07/28Drug-War Nonsense from a U.S. Commander - 07/28New York Times: End Federal Marijuana Prohibition - 07/28Cop Detains Family as They Rush Their 2-Year-Old Son to the Hospital for a Scorpion Sting - 07/25

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top