informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Aug 16 2012, 2:45 AM Category: Commentary Source: Jacob G. Hornberger Print

The Other Side of Hitler

by Jacob G. Hornberger

Whenever the subject of Adolf Hitler arises, it usually begins and ends with the Holocaust and World War II. That’s unfortunate because Hitler had another side, one that is similar to that of liberals and conservatives in America.

Consider Social Security. Hitler was as firm a believer in Social Security as American statists. Like them, he too believed that it was the duty of the government to take care of the elderly by providing them a retirement stipend.

I’ll bet that many Americans don’t realize that Hitler had a Social Security program before President Franklin Roosevelt foisted the program onto the American people as part of his New Deal in the 1930s. The German Social Security program actually originated during the regime of Otto von Bismarck, who was known as the Iron Chancellor of Germany. That’s why the U.S. Social Security Administration pays homage to Bismarck by including a bust of him on its website.

Hitler also believed that the state should provide healthcare to the citizenry. He would have loved Medicare and Medicaid but would have been felt that such programs just didn’t go far enough. He promised healthcare for everyone, not just the elderly and the poor.

Wouldn’t it be great if the mainstream press were to bring this up in the upcoming presidential debates? Just imagine a commentator asking: “President Obama and Gov. Romney, Adolf Hitler shared the same deep commitment to Social Security and government-provided healthcare that you two gentlemen have. How would you explain this? Would you say that Hitler had his caring and compassionate side — that he too loved the poor and needy, as you two gentlemen profess to do?”

Hitler, like Obama and Romney, also considered himself Germany’s job-creator-in-chief. Like them, he believed that it was the rightful duty of government to manage an economy, including by creating jobs for the citizenry.

One of Hitler’s primary means of creating jobs was to build and maintain a powerful military establishment within Germany. That’s also what Obama and Romney believe — that America’s vast military-industrial complex and overseas military empire is a grand way to reduce unemployment.

Government-business partnerships? Hitler loved them, just as Obama and Romney do.

Paper money and a central bank? Hitler ardently believed in them, especially as a way to stimulate Germany’s economy, just as Obama and Romney do.

When we closely examine Hitler’s overall economic philosophy, we find that it is the same as that of Obama and Romney and other American statists, including those in the mainstream press. Hitler’s philosophy can be summed up in a phrase he used in a letter he wrote commending Roosevelt on his New Deal programs: “The public weal before the private gain.”

Doesn’t that phrase reflect the philosophy of American statists? Isn’t that what their condemnation of Ayn Rand is all about? In the statist mind, the individual does not exist for his own sake. He doesn’t exist to pursue his own happiness. That’s selfish. Instead, for the statist, people’s personal interests must be subordinated to the common good — to the much bigger needs of the collective — to the greater good of society — or, as Hitler put it, to the public weal.

Given this collectivist mindset, how can it surprise us that Obama, Romney, Hitler, and other statists would support the welfare-state, managed-economy way of life? In their view, everyone’s income belongs to “society” and government has the rightful authority to forcibly seize it and redistribute it to those whom government officials feel need it more — such as the poor, the elderly, the bankers, the corporations, the auto companies, the farmers, the foreign dictators, and the other recipients of the government dole. The notion that people should be free to keep what they earn and decide for themselves what to do with it was anathema to Hitler and Roosevelt, just as it is to Obama and Romney and other statists. Like Hitler, American statists believe that a nation’s goodness is defined by the extent to which the government is forcing everyone to be good with its welfare-state programs.

That’s not all. Guess who inspired American statists to construct the biggest public-works project in American history — the Interstate Highway System. You guess right! Adolf Hitler’s autobahn system in National Socialist Germany was the inspiration for this giant socialist project here in the United States.

Public schooling? Hitler was as dedicated to the idea as American statists are. Like them, he viewed state schooling as a means of producing “good little citizens” — that is, people who loyally and “patriotically” defer to the judgment of their public officials in international affairs. Thus, just as Americans didn’t challenge President Bush’s WMD rationale for attacking Iraq, Germans didn’t challenge Hitler’s claim that Czech forces had attacked German troops, which Hitler used as his justification for invading Czechoslovakia.

The war on terrorism and the suspension of civil liberties? Just as the U.S. government’s assumption of emergency powers came after the terrorist attacks on 9/11, Hitler’s acquisition of emergency powers came after the terrorist attack on the Reichstag. While Hitler’s emergency powers were supposed to be temporary, they lasted well past 10 years after the terrorist attack, just as the U.S. government’s emergency powers have. Hitler would have undoubtedly envied the extent of the U.S. government’s emergency powers — the powers to take citizens and noncitizens into custody as “enemy combatants,” to incarcerate citizens and noncitizens in military dungeons or concentration camps for life without trial or due process, try people with kangaroo tribunals (Hitler kangaroo tribunal was called The People’s Court), invade and occupy countries that had not attacked Germany, torture citizens and noncitizens into providing confessions and evidence, and assassinate citizens and noncitizens anywhere in the world.

Consider the following planks of the Nazi Party and ask yourself whether it conflicts with the political and economic philosophy of Obama, Romney, and other American statists:
We ask that the government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within its confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: an end to the power of the financial interests . We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand. . . the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education. . . . We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents. . . . The government must undertake the improvement of public health — by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor — by the greatest possible support for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth. We combat the . . . materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of "The Common Good Before the Individual Good ."
Needless to say, we libertarians have no reluctance about talking about the other side of Hitler. But then again, unlike liberals and conservatives and other statists, we also oppose everything Hitler stood for, not just the Holocaust and World War II.
_
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of the Future of Freedom Foundation.





Latest Commentary
- Portrait of a Politician
- How to Provoke a Crisis
- The United Police States of America
- The "C" in "Cop" Stands for "Cruelty" and "Corruption"
- The Ferguson Shooting: Identified Gang Member Kills Possible Gangster Wanna-be
- Abolish the Police
- By the Numbers: How Dangerous Is It to Be a Cop?
- Furious About Ferguson? Work to Free Shaneen Allen









Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Amerikagulag

Posted: Aug 16 2012, 10:42 AM

Link
99147 Glad you brought up the subject because there is a WEALTH of information directly contradicting the claims of \"Holocaust, Inc\". The word itself is a misnomer as it implies a burnt offering. Nothing of the sort occurred under Hitler. It was NEVER solely a Jewish experience Over 6 million Poles were killed as well.

While many people did die under Hitler\'s rule, most of the people in the prison camps died of typhoid due to the lack of medicinal supplies and food - which was a direct result of the Allied Bombings of Germany and its railroads. No suplies could get into the camps. No soap, no lamp shades and no shrunken heads. All pure hooey!

Additionally, we are well advised to remember Stalin - who was directly responsible for the extermination of OVER 60 MILLION people. Yet the west allied itself with him and to this day, demonizes Hitler as the bigger of the two tyrants. Selective disgust?

The other problem with the Hitler myth is the 6 million number. The plaques on the prison camps have even been changed to reflect the more logical numbers. Several hundred thousand is a more realistic estimate.

Yes indeed, Hitler had another side and it was quite different from the picture being presented in schools and books in the US.
Anonymous

Posted: Aug 16 2012, 3:15 PM

Link
756 You can bet yer' bippy Hitler would have only provided state funded health care for the broken gene blue-eyed perfect people rather than provide care to all people of all walks.

Maybe this thesis proffered above should be submitted to news paper editors and governments around the world who have the audacity to think taxes should be spent on the people who pay them....they need to know they are goose stepping their sick & dying into hospitals instead of pretending they are pro-life.

Anonymous

Posted: Aug 16 2012, 7:54 PM

Link
24226 On the subject of healhcare, America pays the most, per capita, for hugely inferior care.

Can't call that a good idea.

Using Hitler in any argument immediately says you are going for an emotional response, not a reasoned and logical one.

Reason and logic, IMHO, usually lead to a better response.

I think your article us utter bullsh*t.

Johann Schlackwurst

Posted: Aug 17 2012, 11:52 PM

Link
99169 All the furor over Der Fürher!
Eponymous

Posted: Aug 20 2012, 1:59 PM

Link
71174 It's easy to say now that one wouldn't have followed Hitler. That's on the basis of knowledge we have that people at the time didn't have. Given the same knowledge and the same situation, many of us probably would have cheered Hitler on if we'd been Germans in 1933.

That goes for a lot of people who call themselves libertarians now. Libertarianism is something of a fair-weather philosophy -- though maybe that's true of all political philosophies. It's popular when the market economy appears to be working. When major problems appear, followers jump ship, as most middle-class liberals in German did (not that they were the only group to support Hitler).

In saying this, I don't mean that you all would have been Hitlerites and I would have remained pure and in opposition. The point is none of us could say what we would have done if we'd been in the position of Germans or other Europeans in the 1930s and 1940s.

Amerikagulag: Those approximately 6 million Poles include about 3 million Polish Jews. Also, a sizeable percentage of those killed in the Holocaust never made it to the camps, but were killed in the field by death squads. Others perished of starvation in the ghettos. Consequently, they aren't included among those who died at Auschwitz. Still, it is estimated that over a million people, not all of them Jews, died or were killed in the Auschwitz-Birkenau complex, with over a million dying at verious other camps taken together.
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

No Jail For Oklahoma Cop Who Lied About Beating Motorist - 08/28The Judicial System's Blessing Of Police Use Of Excessive Force Makes It Nearly Impossible To Hold Bad Cops Accountable - 08/28Hair Trigger Police State: Gamer SWATTED While Streaming Live Online - 08/28Video Of Ferguson Police Gassing News Crew And Dismantling Their Equipment - 08/14Crony Phony Drug War - 08/13Shielding the Executioner: Shaun Cowley, Paul Cassell, and the Murder of Danielle Willard - 08/28Crash Victims, Witnesses Accuse Cops Of Fabricating Police Report Regarding Officer-Involved Collision - 08/27Officer To Citizen: "You Must Be Doing Something Wrong If You Invoke Your Rights" - 08/28

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top