informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Analysis posted Jul 16 2012, 12:55 PM Category: Commentary Source: InformationLiberation Print

'Protected' Great White Shark Bites Young Man in Half

Chris | InformationLiberation

The enviro-fascist Australian government is literally throwing it's citizens to the sharks.

Due to their "protected status," great whites are not allowed to be killed in Australia, same goes for New Zealand, South Africa, and even in America. Penalties differ, but in New Zealand if you dare to kill one of these beasts you face a potential $250,000 fine and 6 months in prison.

Thanks to the government, these vicious predators are allowed to roam free, and they've already killed five people off Australia's western coast this year. The latest victim was a 24 year old surfer who was literally bitten in half by one of these "protected" predators.




Moron environmentalists have managed to concoct a ridiculous fantasy these killers are some gentle creatures who are no threat to anyone. Please tell that to this young boy who just got bitten in half. While I wouldn't dispute a fully fed great white may be gentle and relatively harmless, being in the water with a great white while it's out feeding is an entirely different scenario.

The fact of the matter is people have no idea how many of these sharks there actually are in the ocean, there could be hundreds of thousands of them, or as some estimate as little as 3,500. No one has any actual clue, as the ocean is unimaginably massive there is no way to know with any sort of certainty how many are out there.

The issue here is one of self-defense and whether or not human should be allowed to advance as a species. Should people be allowed to defend themselves against the dangers of the outside world, or do we have to just accept life as it is now and forgo any hope of progress?

We build houses out of steel to defend against hurricanes, we put up mosquito nets to defend against mosquitoes festering with disease, yet when it comes to great whites the government says we need to "swim with the fishes."
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.





Latest Commentary
- The War on Drugs Was Born 100 Years Ago
- What America Wannabe?
- Judicial Deference to the Torturers
- Ross Ulbricht Should Be Freed in a Fair Trial
- Government Save Us From "Overpriced" Chinese Food
- I Love Loosies and the People Who Sell Them
- Obama's Plan for Better Policing: The Good, the Bad, and the Body Cameras
- Statism: The Most Dangerous Religion (feat. Larken Rose)









Comments 21 - 40 of 66 Add Comment < Page of 4 >
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:30 AM

Link
193200 wow.. the only argument you can mount is to put words into anothers mouth... thats about as stupid as it gets..

you.. kill everything!

me:

dont fucking swim where theres sharks stupid.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8500796/most-shark-attacks-in-risky-situations
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:32 AM

Link
193200 lol - spider traps .. what a fuckwit..
Chris

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:35 AM

Link
I am dumber for having read that article.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:42 AM

Link
193200 you do realise also, in australia, if a shark is biting you, the government will not press charges if you strangle the bugger..

just because im against going around blasting sharks because im not a fuckwit like you, doesnt mean id just lie down and die if bitten by a snake or a spider either.. your logic is warped.. youre either a lot more stupid than i thought, or youre being deliberately obtuse..

i never said anything about a perfect eco system, or putting anything out of whack either moron., i simply dont see the logic in going aroind killing things just for the sake of it.

you know a lot of people die from the flu here each year... maybe we should kill everyone with a runny nose... hell .. lets just kill anyone with a nose!

i reckon a lot more people die from bee stings worldwide than shark attacks... whats your solution einstein? kill all the bees?
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:42 AM

Link
193200 your just dumb.. deal with it shit for brains.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:43 AM

Link
193200 i know i mnissed the e too before you go all grammar nazi again
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:45 AM

Link
193200 and the fact is.. most shark attacks are in risky situations; that is early morning, dusk.. remote areas..

if you think facts make you dumber.. well.. that says more about you than anything i can say.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:49 AM

Link
193200 "is literally throwing it's citizens to the sharks"


literal - look that word up too dumbarse.

Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:55 AM

Link
193200 kill all the dogs!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States
Chris

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 7:57 AM

Link
I think we need to accept bee stings as a part of life, and rather than have epinephrine shots for people who would die from them, they need to just accept their fate and die, it's what mother Gaia intended and they need to just accept it.

Dang! I feel like I could fit right in with your enviro-cult now!
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:02 AM

Link
193200 http://www.koat.com/news/national/Explainer-Shark-Attacks-in-Australia/-/9153826/15569670/-/29mqvqz/-/index.html

A 24-year-old surfer was killed last weekend in a shark attack off the coast of Western Australia, marking the fifth such reported incident in ten months.

The deaths have reopened the debate about our understanding of sharks and whether more should be done to control their population.

How many shark attacks have occurred in Australia?

Read More: http://www.koat.com/news/national/Explainer-Shark-Attacks-in-Australia/-/9153826/15569670/-/29mqvqz/-/index.html
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:04 AM

Link
193200 what enviro-cult idiot?

you making shit up again - typical loser.. stick to what ive said
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:12 AM

Link
193200 "We build houses out of steel to defend against hurricanes,"

lol - no you fuckin dont liar..

tornado damage in Kansas 2007
http://imgur.com/nfOli
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:15 AM

Link
193200 "as the ocean is unimaginably massive"

actually.. we have maps.. we dont need to imagine how large the ocean is.. its all been measured and calculated.. we actually know exactly how big it is...

your stupidity could probably fill ten earth oceans.. and then some.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:19 AM

Link
193200 "Should people be allowed to defend themselves against the dangers of the outside world, or do we have to just accept life as it is now and forgo any hope of progress? "

a sign says.. danger sharks..

people are allowed to defend themselves against being attacked by risk avoidence, ( go to another fucking beach theres no shortage of fucking coastline ) or they are allowed to take the risk if they like..

everything that comes out your mouth is moronic... hilariously so... keep going!
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:24 AM

Link
193200 nice edit job...

you just didnt like the facts staring you in the face eh... spare me the bullshit about it being too long.. it just irks you that common sense and logic doesnt sit well with your fucked up view of the world
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:34 AM

Link
193200 "The chance of encountering a shark remains very low, and...even if an encounter occurs, the chances of being attacked are very small," said West. Over the last decade, an annual average of 16 shark encounters has been recorded, with 27% of cases resulting in no injury or death, he said. Comparing the figure with the annual average of 87 drowning deaths at Australian beaches, he commented, "People should be more concerning with swimming at a beach than being killed in a shark attack."
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:36 AM

Link
193200 Kempster urged beachgoers to have a sense of personal responsibility, as he pointed out that, "after the most recent attack, there were surfers in the water at the same beach the attack occurred, even though there were clear signs warning people not to enter the water."

West echoed that people should avoid areas where dangerous sharks are known to gather, as well as far-offshore areas, deep channels, drop-offs to deeper water, and areas with poor underwater visibility. People should swim at beaches patrolled by Surf Live Savers and swim with companions (although not pets, as non-aquatic animals can attract sharks.)
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:37 AM

Link
193200 The Department of Fisheries announced that it will spend AUD 13.65M (US$ 14M) over five years to research shark populations and movements and improve attack response procedures. This includes setting up the Shark Response Unit and extending its white shark monitoring program for two years under the unit, which includes tagging white sharks with acoustic transmitters to track their movements.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 17 2012, 8:38 AM

Link
193200 literally NOT throwing citizens to the sharks.
Comments 21 - 40 of 66 < Page of 4 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

A Peace Officer Defies the "Blue Tribe": The Exile of Officer Cariol Horne - 12/19Baby Clings to Life After Flash-Bang Grenade Lands in His Crib - 12/20Cop Stops Fellow Cop From Choking a Handcuffed Man, She Was Then Beaten and Fired - 12/18For Punitive Populists, "Comply or Die" IS The "Law" - 12/19Thieves Yell "Police" Before Invading Home, Shooting and Robbing Resident - 12/18Cops Called For Wellness Check Beat Innocent Man, Pile On False Charges; Jury Exonerates, Twice - 12/17Psychotic Vegas Cop Filmed Beating Man For Filming In Viral Video Queitly Hired By Another Dept. - 12/17Ignorance Is No Excuse for Wrongdoing, Unless You're a Cop - 12/17

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top