The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Jul 03 2012, 5:44 AM Category: Resistance Source: Libertarian News Print

New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law!

by Michael Suede

New Hampshire Adopts Jury Nullification Law! July 2, 2012By For those of you who don't know much about jury nullification, basically it's when the jury finds a defendant innocent because of their dislike of the law. For example, a jury might refuse to convict a non-violent drug offender because they disagree with the fundamental premise of drug laws themselves.

Throughout the United States, judges have forbidden defense attorneys from informing juries that they have a right to nullify the law based on their dislike of the law. In California for example, jurors are required to inform on other jurors if one of them argues that the law is bad. The judge will then replace that juror with an alternate. A defense attorney who argues on grounds of nullification could face disbarment or other sanctions by the court, even though nullification is a right all U.S. jurors poses under common law.

On June 18, New Hampshire Governor John Lynch signed HB 146, which reads:

“[A] Right of Accused. In all criminal proceedings the court shall permit the defense to inform the jury of its right to judge the facts and the application of the law in relation to the facts in controversy.”

I have the feeling this New Hampshire law will end up having a tremendous effect on the American judicial system as a whole. If enough people start nullifying drug laws in New Hampshire, eventually New Hampshire prosecutors will be forced to stop prosecuting drug offenses in that state entirely. In 2010, a Montana case never even made it to trial because prosecutors could not find enough people who would be willing to convict a person based on drug charges.

It is a little-known fact that the vast majority of cases in America never make it to a jury trial. The Florida Bar released a report showing that less than 1% of civil and criminal cases go before a jury. This is because legislatures have imposed incredibly stiff penalties for all sorts of victimless crimes, which makes gambling with a jury trial inherently dangerous for those who are accused of violating a victimless law. Often prosecutors will initially charge a person with numerous felony offenses, then offer a plea deal for far less time if the person agrees to plead guilty; thereby avoiding a jury trial. Presently, people who are charged with growing 50 or more marijuana plants under federal law face 20 years in prison. Often prosecutors will drop that to 5 years under a lesser charge if a person agrees to plead guilty.

If jury nullification were to become widespread, more and more people would again seek jury trials hoping for an acquittal. Since the number of people being charged with victimless crimes has increased exponentially, the U.S. court system itself would crumble under the weight of pending jury trials.  Prosecutors would have no choice but to stop prosecuting victimless laws or face an implosion of the legal system.

Here is a document on nullification created by a lawyer that explains your rights as a juror. Every American citizen should take the time to read this document.

In the video below, historian Tom Woods explains the impact of nullification by state legislatures and juries throughout America’s history. Jury nullification was used to combat fugitive slave laws, as well as to fight against laws that violated free speech and free trade.

Latest Resistance
- Bill Introduced To Repeal Patriot Act And Prevent The Government From Demanding Encryption Backdoors
- New Mexico Legislature Abolishes Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Cops in Colorado Could Soon Face $15,000 Fines if they Try to Stop People from Filming
- Good Cop Fired for Stopping Fellow Cop from Beating a Mentally Ill Man, Gets her Job Back!
- State Law that Legalized Self Defense Against Cops Just Got Man's Conviction Overturned
- Historic Federal Bill to Legalize Medical Marijuana Rolled Out Today
- Vet Facing Life Sentence Found Not Guilty for Aiming Pistol at Cops Who Failed to Identify as Cops
- Jury Acquits Hollywood Man Who Said He Grew Pot Because He Medically Needed It

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Jul 03 2012, 7:00 AM

7414 I like the sound of this. Good for you, NH!
I read a few references to drug laws in the article, but just wait until this starts happening in Income Tax cases (unconstitutional...cough cough).
John James Chorzempa Jr.

Posted: Jul 04 2012, 1:42 PM

9867 There is no such thing as Jury nullification; there is only "Jury Sovereignty"; specifically: the the Right nd Responsibility of all Sovereign Men and Sovereign Women when called upon to sit in any Lawful Jury to "Judge - All Laws, Statutes, Ordinances, Codes, at the Same time it examines All Facts", exercising and executing all reasonable, fair, equitable, compassionate, and Just Judgments, as is their God given and Constitutionally Contracted, Granted, and Protected Responsibility to fulfill from their Original Superior Jurisdiction.
It is without question that Original Superior Jurisdiction is: "Of The People, By the People, and For the People".
It is not of the Legislature, by the Legislature, for the Legislature, nor is It of the Executive, by the Executive, for the Executive, nor of the Judges, by the Judges, for the Judges.
All "Actions and Processes" the above Publicly paid "Employee Officials" are exercised and executed from inferior jurisdictions derived and derived, deligated,and granted from the Original and Sovereign Jurisdiction of Sovereign Men and and Sovereign Women in their "Original Jurisdiction of the People".
A failure of any Employee Judge to Notice any and all lawfully empaneled Jury the it is their Responsibility to examine and Judge Any and All Laws envloved in any portion of any Jurial Process is a "Violation of Their Oath Of Office: To Protect the Constitution and the People", is a violation which should mandates impeachment and under graves circumstances be examined even for charges of treason against the nation.
The use of the Term: "Jury Nulification" is an "Injury to the any and All of the Sovereign People". It describes and says to any "Reasonable Man", by using the adjective negation word "Nullification" along side of "Jury": "Jury Not", "Jury No", "Jury Null", Jury "Nulified". These two words when used together are insulting, disrespectful and injurious to the Sovereign "People".
Consider in comparison the proper, true and truthful responsibilities and executed actions of any "Sovereign Jury", exercising its "Jury Sovereignty"; it exercises and executed Judgments which consider " All Laws and All Facts". Anything less is any partial, unjust, injurious to the People, in singular and plural.
What is needed most is a National Jury Soverignty 28th Amendment to our Constitution and to the Constitution of all of the States of our Nation.

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

New Video Appears to Show Cops Planting Crack in Innocent Man's Car After Brutally Beating Him - 03/27To Crush a Cop-Watcher: Prosecutorial Abuse in Ada County, Idaho - 03/27Video: Detroit Police Sergeant Caught Planting Evidence To Destroy Family Owned Business - 03/26'You Might Be a Terrorist If...': Leaked Document Reveals Secret TSA Check List - 03/27This Cop Got a First Hand Taste of Police Brutality and His Violent Arrest was Also Caught on Video - 03/27Texas Sheriff Gets Shut Down when Trying to Intimidate Man who Flawlessly Flexes his Rights - 03/27"I'm Not Stupid" Monsanto Lobbyist Refuses To Drink Weedkiller After Proclaiming "It Won't Hurt You" - 03/27Police Officer Caught With His Pants Down... Masturbating At Starbucks - 03/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up