informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Apr 02 2012, 8:57 PM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: Infowars Print

Supreme Court Rules Strip Searches OK for Minor Offenses

Kurt Nimmo

In a 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that it is permissible for jailers to strip search people arrested and jailed on minor offenses, even if they have not violated the law.

Justice Kennedy wrote for the majority when he said that when an arrested person is to be put into the general jail population, “courts must defer to the judgment of correctional officials unless the record contains substantial evidence showing their policies are an unnecessary or unjustified response to problems of jail security.”

Justice Stephen Breyer dissented. He said strip searches improperly “subject those arrested for minor offenses to serious invasions of their personal privacy.”

The case reached the Supreme Court after Albert Florence was strip searched following his arrest on a warrant for an unpaid fine. In fact, the fine had been paid. It is not a crime in New Jersey not to pay a fine. After six days, Florence had not received a hearing on the case. He was transferred to another jail in Newark, New Jersey, where he was strip searched again. The following day, all charges were dropped and Florence was released.

The case represents a further erosion of the Fourth Amendment. For over thirty years, U.S. appeals courts have uniformly held that strip searches without suspicion violate the Constitution. Unless there is a reason for suspicion, the Constitution forbids searches without a court warrant.

In 2008, in the first appellate rulings on strip searches since September 11, 2012, appeals courts in Atlanta, Philadelphia and San Francisco ruled that the need of the state to maintain security justified a wide-ranging search policy, no matter the reason for someone’s detention and despite the protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment.





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- City Settles With 70-Yr-Old Woman After Body Cam Contradicts Officer's Claim She Was 'Resisting'
- 'My House Got Blown Up By An AK-47': No Charges For Florida Deputy Who Shot Up Woman's Home
- Cops Shutdown High School Kids Trying to Earn Money by Shoveling Snow
- Baltimore City Officials Claim Baltimore City Police Are Not City Employees
- School Forces Elementary Students to Pull Pants Down for 'Poop Inspection'
- Cali. Cop Avoids Jail After Pleading No Contest to Stealing Womens' Nudes Off Cell Phones During Arrests
- New Sheriff Beats His Boss in Election, Sues Him for Protecting Crooked Cops
- Police Fear Monger About Higher Taxes and Mass Chaos If Civil Asset Forfeiture Is Not Allowed









No Comments Posted Add Comment


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Video: Americans Want Obama to Repeal the Bill of Rights - 01/26City Settles With 70-Yr-Old Woman After Body Cam Contradicts Officer's Claim She Was 'Resisting' - 01/28Why I Don't Need To Call A Crackhead Instead Of A Cop: A False Dichotomy Dismantled - 01/27The American Sniper Was No Hero - 01/2817-Year-Old Girl with Mental Illness Shot and Killed in Police Station Lobby After She Picked Up a Knife - 01/27'My House Got Blown Up By An AK-47': No Charges For Florida Deputy Who Shot Up Woman's Home - 01/28Cops Shutdown High School Kids Trying to Earn Money by Shoveling Snow - 01/28New Sheriff Beats His Boss in Election, Sues Him for Protecting Crooked Cops - 01/28

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top