The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Analysis posted Feb 25 2012, 7:41 AM Category: Cover-Up/Deceptions Source: InformationLiberation Print

John Bolton dodges question from anti-war vet about blowback, insults him; Fox edits out the audience booing and replaces with it applause. [Updated]

Chris | InformationLiberation

"I was in the audience for the taping. Bolton was booed when taking the stage, at which point one of the show's producers hissed at us and said something about "allowing a fair debate". In spite of that, he was then booed overwhelmingly after giving his back-handed insult of an answer to the young vet at the microphone. You can hear a bit of her hissing and shushing again during the clip when the boos start up." - Via r/Libertarian

Note, this isn't the first time FOX was caught editing out boos and replacing it with applause, one year ago FOX was caught editing footage from CPAC where Ron Paul won the straw poll and was cheered, they edited the cheers out and replaced them with boos! They later said it was a "mistake" and they just so happened to have edited in footage from the previous year.

UPDATE: Stossel just released the full unedited video of the question at hand. It shows the vet was edited out of the clip and John Bolton was not cheered, but it does not show he was booed after his response was over.

In the unedited clip you can hear a slight hiss/murmur after Bolton's response at which point the vet responds saying, "Nothing was violated sir, that's what I'm saying.."

Stossel cuts him off and says, "Well, we can't debate this whole thing now, let's just go on to one more questioner, thank you."

At that point there was some applause which seemed to me to be directed towards the vet, whom Stossel just thanked, and not Bolton. (This was all cut, regardless, but Stossel seems to think this was the applause edited into the footage which actually aired, it wasn't.)

Another person in a black shirt then gets to the mic, this is the person seen in the edited video above leaving after the vet's question was asked, he asks a different question on internet freedom which Stossel says they cut due to time, Bolton is applauded after it (he gave a populist response) and Stossel announces the end of the segment and teases the next one. (This is the footage they seamlessly edited in which gave the impression Bolton got applause. It should be noted Fox overlaid applause before Bolton's response was even done, where there should have been silence while he was finishing his statement, there was instead applause. [1:44-1:45])

The two videos frankly give a very different impression, while Stossel says it was an edit due to time, which is believable (and certainly, much more believable than Fox's claim from last year they accidentally edited in footage from the previous year's CPAC), the editing still gave a very different impression from what actually happened.

Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- State Department 'Planted' Anti-Wikileaks Questions For 60 Minutes Interview With Julian Assange
- 9/11: Decade of Deception
- Local Cops Suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev Was An FBI Informant, According To Globe Columnist
- Did The EPA Intentionally Poison Animas River To Secure SuperFund Money?
- FBI Arrests Florida Man Over Fake Bomb Plot
- The Real Untold Story Of Government's Takedown of Silk Road
- Entrapped: Chris Christie and a Manufactured New Jersey Terror Plot
- How Chris Christie Used A Manufactured Terrorist Plot To Boost His Political Career

Comments 41 - 50 of 50 Add Comment < Page of 3

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 10:21 AM

24121 Nice lie! Here's the truth. Fox didn't replace anything.

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 10:32 AM


Information Liberation is the liar here. Truth is above

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 11:55 AM

69249 He completely dodged the question and tried to redirect the audience's focus to what he calls a "dis-service" that this veteran of war is doing, by simply speaking his mind and asking an intelligent question- which, again, was completely ignored.

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 12:04 PM

69249 and, hmmm. he's a film maker- i wonder why he got kicked out of the army?---was he perhaps borrowing equipment to try to expose some shit that was going on over there and got caught by the Man and kicked out? that's just conjecture. But why do we just accept what we are told all the time? Real life is not following orders- you have to think objectively about what orders are and right and wrong- and who is giving the order and whether what they are ordering you to do is in fact honorable. Not just because they tell you it is.

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 5:10 PM

86181 FOX news should be ashamed of themselves. Doctoring a tv programme so as Bolton looks better to the national viewers. That is a fucking outrage. Heads would roll if this sort of behaviour happened on UK TV

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 6:44 PM

68177 Had to respond back to some of these lol. So you all really think the Government(Ill give it to ya, they are controlled by business's via lobbiest however can still say no to those lobbiest) has no control over what content is aired on a news network that provides it's channel to the US??? really??? tell me one news network that reports things like this? Muslim judge threw a case out of assault as an atheist insulted Mohammad and the muslim attacked him and the judge is upholding Sharia law in the US? Shouldn't this be on the main stream news? no? too controversial? says who? think the news organizations would go after a story like that to get awesome ratings, so why would they not.....? please tell me all about how you know these news networks are not being controlled 100% by the "greater good". thanks, I'll check back on this post as soon as I can :).

Posted: Feb 28 2012, 7:40 PM

7134 The anti-war man is right

Posted: Feb 29 2012, 1:38 AM

24171 >Stoney
Defending against anti fox allegations by using a fox business article? You can't possibly think that that's a good idea...
papa bear

Posted: Mar 04 2012, 10:51 PM

17429 dude i know this guy and he is a total douche, he got kicked out of ranger battalion and he only went on 1 mission, and not to mention that he tried to put in an objector packet AND GOT DENIED!!! what an absolute disgrace to the the REAL Rangers of 3rd ranger bat... he was always looking for a way out because he is a coward and was afraid of combat... his corporal "friend" that got killed was one of the real rangers that fought and died with honor. David West is a coward and should hang his head in shame instead of saying that he is a war veteran. RLTW... in which David West has not relevant knowledge of what we do overseas because he quit after 1 mission and was on kitchen duty for the duration of his deployment

Posted: Apr 16 2012, 8:38 PM

98220 Dude is not a Veteran he never "served" his country he cam in got scared and became a conciencious objector. Never went out and stole from the government and his coworkers. I am ashamed of him as I am sure his family is as well.
Comments 41 - 50 of 50 < Page of 3

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

VIDEO: Dashcam Refutes Cop's Story of "Fearing For His Life," Shows Him Taser Man For Parking Ticket - 10/06VIDEO: Woman Reports Cop's Rude Behavior, Cop Retaliates By Pulling Her Over & Beating Her - 10/05Drudge on AJ: Copyright Laws Will Destroy the Internet - 10/06Woman Called 911 to Report Stolen Wallet, Crazed Cop Showed Up and Beat Her Unconscious - 10/06'Neutralizing' John Lennon: One Man Against The 'Monster' - 10/06Cops Lied to Get Innocent Disabled Man Imprisoned for Elderly Woman's Rape & Murder, Hid Contradictory Evidence - 10/05Cop Block Interviews College Students; 'What Are The Police Paid to Do?' - 10/06VIDEO: Cop Smashes Suspect's Face With Shotgun, Gets Charged With Felony - 10/05

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up