The news you're not supposed to know...

Multimedia

An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires

The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off

Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in Europe

The New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century(more)

Article posted Dec 07 2011, 4:26 PM

Category: Big Brother/Orwellian

Source: Prison Planet

'Occupy' Protesters Listed As Domestic Terrorists

Demonstrators characterized in same context as Al-Qaeda, Colombian FARC
Paul Joseph Watson

Occupy London demonstrators have been listed as domestic terrorists by the City of London Police, who characterized them in the same context as Al-Qaeda, the Colombian FARC and Belarusian terrorists who bombed the Minsk underground.

“The City of London Police force was facing criticism last night after including the Occupy London demonstration in a letter warning businesses about potential terrorist threats,” reports the Independent.

Police admitted the leaflet, entitled, “Terrorism/Extremism Update,” was produced by them but claimed it was “poorly worded”.

“Activism is not a crime and the desire to participate in democratic decision-making should not be a cause for concern for the police in any free society,” said an Occupy London representative.

Previous advertising campaigns by other law enforcement bodies in London educated the public that behavior such as paying with cash, keeping curtains closed, or minding your own business were all signs of potential terrorism.

One radio commercial, produced by the The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), was later banned because it smeared law-abiding citizens and could “encourage people to harass or victimise their neighbours and was appealing to people’s fear.”

As we reported earlier, ‘Occupy’ demonstrators over the pond in Portland staged a march yesterday to protest the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act, which under Section 1031 could lead to demonstrators being carted off to detention camps and held without trial.

The Department of Defense is now training its personnel that protest amounts to "low-level terrorism" through tests that DoD staffers are required to take on a yearly basis.

Whether you agree with the grievances of the ‘Occupy’ movement or not, the fact that protest groups are now being designated as domestic terrorists underscores the fact that governments now treat dissent and the exercise of freedoms as a suspicious activity.

Yet weren’t we told the terrorists attacked us because they hate our freedoms? It appears as if the terrorists have won.

See a copy of the police letter below.

__
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- The War On Journalists: DOJ Claimed Fox News Reporter Was An 'Aider, Abettor, Co-Conspirator' With Leaker
- Eric Holder Claims Terrorists Are Involved In 'IP Theft'
- Kiwis Want To Spy On All Communications, VPNs, And Be Able To Use Secret Evidence Against You
- VP Joe Biden Believes There's 'No Legal Reason' The Government Can't Slap A Sin Tax On 'Violent Media'
- College Students Petition to Ban Black Backpacks After Boston Bombing
- State Department orders firm to remove 3D-printed guns web blueprints
- CNN: Will 3D Printers Make It Easier For Terrorist Operate Gun Factories In Their Homes?
- Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?

Comments 1 - 5 of 5

Add Comment

Page 1 of 1

Dave

Posted: Dec 08 2011, 9:52 AM

Link

i presume that some people might believe this write up.

in 1984 there was the inner party, outer party and proles. then there was the issue of how closely the inner party were monitored which brings in V, the forces that fight to maintain division.

here in plymouth last time i looked they have removed the (div) V for Vendetta script from the 'occupy' camp, i had mentioned it was the script for the public party, ie the presentation of a public revolution.

from memory in the film (div) V for Vendetta a member of the secret society known as the police who fight for division every day asks his underling 'can i trust you?' that is the political world, built on distrust and before asking the question the initiation into the con is tested, the detective moves a mind reading device across his desk, part of the revealing it was a V led revolution using mind control puppets and double agents.

before i was in exeter, the entire cathedral green was remade with the usual mafia indicators (e.g. lottery funding for the change). a statue was moved to the edge, new camera lamps were installed with the feed going into exeter cathedral. there is much preparation before revolutions (remaking dictatorships), likely there has been some near you.

friendstacy

Posted: Dec 08 2011, 10:04 AM

Link

quote: "...the fact that governments now treat dissent and the exercise of freedoms as a suspicious activity"

governments always have done so. it's certainly nothing new.
and if the protesters managed to overthrow the evil regime and implement a new one, the new one would still have to silence dissent and oppress people, because that is what government does.

Dave

Posted: Dec 08 2011, 10:07 AM

Link

people who become involved with the occupy movement who would be a problem for the political intentions likely will be targeted in critical areas. moved on, arrested etc. it is self evidentally an official protest, by plan (before posting this) costumes included.

in 2001 space odyssey the AI control machinery is taken out, there is time reversal back towards victorian era and this is followed by the birth of a star child. new myth for a new age as there has to be a chosen one to unchose everyone else.

so much was written so long ago in these plans that one of the aspects people might find odd is that the words and other parts of presentation don't fit the country or current time. planet earth, control systems undergoing not routine maintenance but catastrophic failure including happenings not necessarily in the scheduled sequence or schedule.

friendstacy

Posted: Dec 08 2011, 10:16 AM

Link

and since they are so loyal to the official script, let us not forget what they did to socrates after the revolution he helped them win.

Dave

Posted: Dec 08 2011, 10:30 AM

Link

state sales people (e.g. police, church, companies comprising the state) are in a frenzy collecting names, police routinely collecting the same names over and over and over again. the church sometimes try to do it subtly, sometimes health and safety is used by corporate entities, cameras overt and covert everywhere including on police heads. as per alice in wonderland it is the name game to control people.

in the case of the police (policy enforcement) at one time in britland they called them the 'old bill'. with names and later electronic entities there was pay as you earn, standing charges, rent, utility bills, direct debits so the mafia (which the state is) could simply grab the money.

if you talk to an accountant they will want to talk false matrix, your gross pay. you might get £x a month but the accountant will disagree and insist on money that you cannot touch or see as it is stolen without your consent before you have it.

'stand and deliver' is one thing but gov is the holistic con where it is everyone kneel and deliver. using names and numbers has allowed for the highway robbery of even children before they are born.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5

Page 1 of 1

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy