informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Oct 20 2011, 4:13 PM Category: General Source: Reddit Print

Penn Jillette gets it.



Via byukid r/Libertarian





Latest General
- New York Times: End Federal Marijuana Prohibition
- The Purge: Anarchy PARODY
- Peter Schiff On Gov't Push To Regulate Navigation Apps
- New Miss U.S.A. Criticized For Saying Women Should Be Prepared To Defend Themselves
- "Minnesota 'Unsession' Dumps 1,175 Obsolete, Silly Laws"
- Lawyer: Family Warned Cops Before Calif. Rampage
- The Racism Obsession: Will Grigg on the Tom Woods Show
- What Passes For "Debate" In 'Murica's Colleges









Comments 21 - 40 of 69 Add Comment < Page of 4 >
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 12:17 AM

Link
17358 Yea, I go with the 99%. And frankly with Cookie_monster of Occupy Sesame street. His two remarks, frequently quoted on the net, are sensible.
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/10/guy_called_cookie_monster_offe.php
Find the follow up remark, it is on the second page of comments.

There could be legislation that would help.
Any such would be against libertarian philosophy.

How about a law that those persons and corporations and corporations that enable persons to have more salary than 40 times the least worker be taxed higher, proportionately to the amount over 40x that they are over 40x, with a ceiling of no more than twice the tax or 60% which ever is higher. Tax would be based on tax before tax breaks.
All compensation would be considered, both the taxes and social security and other company paid deductions, plus anything put to retirement for the employee. Similarly any stock or other options as well as straight money paid to the executive should count.

It could be an incentive to leave, or to pay the janitor more.
Trickle down is and always has been a fraud.
This law could generate some serious trickle down.

As to private vs taxed giving, all the private giving is not going to make up the taxed giving, and the contribution to the public need.

And if you want to tax, please tax disposable income, that which is over the income needed for food and shelter, and basics. Many would pay no tax, they are the working poor. Frankly we should honor their work and persistence. After that, if you want to flat tax the remains, go for it. But something like double the poverty level should be protected. The poverty level is disgusting. We can not all eat road kill, there is not enough to go around.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 1:03 AM

Link
7621 I don't care about poor people and neither do any of you. If you actually do care about poor people go and do something about it out of voluntarism. Everyone is up in arms when Christianity and Christian ideas are forced down the throats of American people. Why should I be forced to care about poor people? AND it IS forced. If you don't pay your taxes the IRS will come and lock you away. Stop pretending you actually care about the poor--REALLY caring doesn't involve sitting on your sofa watching TV and letting the government siphon money out of your income. You can't claim to be doing good when you are being forced to do it.
tak

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 7:40 AM

Link
9894 Pompous libertarian prick. I've got it good in life, so why is everyone else complaining? They should be able to survive on my table scraps.

Somalia should be a libertarian's paradise but I don't see Penn packing his bags.

A democratic government is supposed to be run by the people, for the people's benefit. The problem is NOT our representative government. The problem is that corporations are considered "persons" with rights that trump those of actual citizens, so our needs go ignored. Don't eliminate the government, FIX it. And as for paying taxes, it's part of the social contract. The schools, police, fire departments, social security, medicare, etc. don't operate only when rich people are feeling charitable.

Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 9:04 AM

Link
20450 you might want to read his entire essay before commenting on it:

http://www.midlifebachelor.com/forums/showthread.php/198-Penn-Jillette-Why-I%E2%80%99m-a-Libertarian
Oldestgenxer

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 9:46 AM

Link
9785 Oh, how brilliant all of you retards are. Knee-jerk reactions from knee-jerk liberals. Oh, the rich are evil. Oh, they don't pay their share. I believe it because Obama told me so.
I'm not saying that all rich people are good and kind and sweet angels, but Christ in sidecar--
If you think the government is the answer, you're asking the wrong fucking questions.
Btw, it's a proven fact that conservatives give more to charities than libs. Libs want the government to take care of it so they don't have to do or think or be responsible. Typical.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 10:59 AM

Link
70176 Agree with the spirit, and will make the same claim for those doing good deeds to buy their way into heaven.

Realize that in the land of "greed is good", voluntary compassion will never cut it. The govt programs are necessary to pacify the poor and stabilize the system against revolt.

Penn is an illusionist after all, so I'm not sure you should take his words at face value. Perhaps he is really hoping for revolt.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 4:05 PM

Link
66169 some people get joy from it!
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2011, 10:10 PM

Link
97125 Maybe if you rich fucks quit ripping off the poor the poor wouldn't be poor and they wouldn't need to be helped. Talentless oppressor of mute man
I think

Posted: Oct 25 2011, 10:46 PM

Link
72191 If individuals can take from a common pot regardless of how much they put in it, then each person has an incentive to be a free-rider, to do as little as possible and take as much as possible because what one fails to take will be taken by someone else. Soon, the pot is empty.
I think

Posted: Oct 25 2011, 10:49 PM

Link
72191 The Federal government can only give what it has already taken. Minus it's operating cost.
I think

Posted: Oct 25 2011, 10:51 PM

Link
72191 The next time you pour a gallon of rotten milk down the sink, or throw away a loaf of moldy bread, remember that it was capitalism that allowed you to do so. Just as well, the next time you wonder by what misfortune some people in the world live in horrible conditions while you enjoy what they could not even fathom, remember that it was capitalism that allowed you to even notice the dichotomy. Despite the spurious reputation capitalism has as a harbinger of poverty, I can justifiably say, "Thank goodness for capitalism
I think

Posted: Oct 25 2011, 10:59 PM

Link
72191 Help the poor, print more money. Oh, wait, this administration is already doing it.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 10:43 AM

Link
17417 okay, how about we just get rid of all government, and all laws and regulations! oh wait... :I
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 10:49 AM

Link
1539 Genius. Point blank, period.
realpatriot

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 11:18 AM

Link
108208 What he doesn't understand is that American billionaires are so self -centered, and full of greed they won't give anything unless forced to. Most of them only donate for tax breaks and photo ops.
99%

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 11:23 AM

Link
108208 it's pretty simple really...rich people want to get richer, and they also want poor people to stay poor. why do you think they are buying out our politicians to pass laws that are harming normal working folks?
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 12:57 PM

Link
72223 Jillette is also "Tea Bagger Puppet" for the Koch Brothers and The Cato Institue......

Penn Jillette and Raymond Teller, are fellows at the Cato Institute.

Cato was founded in 1977 by Edward H. Crane and Charles Koch, [2] the billionaire co-owner of Koch Industries known for its financing of the Tea Party and various extreme right front groups.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cato_Institute
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 26 2011, 3:21 PM

Link
6469 No I think he's pointing out the we want others to do even our good deed for us. If we all donated time and energy to helping others, no matter what our financial situation is, fewer would go hungry or cold. It costs money to pay people to run bureaucracy. Volunteer. Do good for others. Be genuinely charitable.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 27 2011, 2:41 AM

Link
98234 It's not about forcing people to give at gunpoint but to create a system for helping the poor, the sick and the elderly so that none of them get left behind because they weren't lucky enough to receive help. It's easy for a man to give when he finds people in need, it's more difficult for a man who does not make the millions Penn Jillette makes to figure out how to give his money in order to truly help society. Giving money to the charity organization that manages to market the most is not an efficient way to solve issues like hunger.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 01 2011, 6:51 PM

Link
72147 He is a blocker. Not a ball carrier. Go for the ball.

The game play is at wall street. Repealing the Commodities Futures Modernization act and re establishing the protections of Glass Stiegle. His issue is a distraction like evolution/ creationism, Big Foot, Hurricane Irene, sharks at the beach, Tax cuts for the rich.

Return to supply and demand in the oil futures market bigun. Rail against the small guy no more. The issue is sovereignty.
Comments 21 - 40 of 69 < Page of 4 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

By the Numbers: How Dangerous Is It to Be a Cop? - 08/21Man Picks Up Toy Gun At Walmart, Cops Shoot Him - 08/07Taxfeeding Cop Threatens Shooting Spree Over Other People Receiving Welfare - 08/07Citizen Pursues a Cop For Speeding. When the Cop Sees The Camera, Magic Happens - 08/07Turning America Into a War Zone, Where 'We the People' Are the Enemy - 08/21Army to Continue 'Black Helicopter' Training Over Twin Cities Despite Anger - 08/21Ferguson Cop Tells Protester "Go F*ck Yourself" & Threatens To Kill Him - 08/20This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories - 08/21

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top