The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Sep 17 2011, 2:01 PM Category: General Source: Mimi and Eunice Print

Freedom or Fairness? (Comic)

Latest General
- Georgia Sheriff Puts Up Sign Warning People Who Disagree With Him About God to Leave
- VIDEO: Chicago Protester Gives Cop Epic Stare Down
- Is Black Friday Racist?
- VIDEO: Hillary Fans Voice Support For Her 'Plan to Repeal 4th Amendment'
- AZ State Supreme Court Rules Cannabis In The Blood Does Not Constitute Impairment
- Black Lives Matter Group Demands Concealed Carry Ban At University of Kansas
- Trump to Protester: "I Mention Food Stamps and That Guy Who's Seriously Overweight Went Crazy!"
- Americans Sign Petition to Rename Washington D.C. Because 'George Washington Was A Racist Slave Owner'

Comments 1 - 20 of 26 Add Comment Page of 2 >

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 9:54 PM

freedom, to use that word on a planet infested with propaganda feels freaky, as if it is some novelty, as if people are so conditioned they would ask what it means, how they could join and what the rules are. i would rather discuss that freedom is a word that to some can imply order as opposed to disorder and refinement of order is the vector to destruction.

it might help if people knew the size, sophistication, capabilities, activities and true vector of the domination architecture. if the aims were achieved, the possibility of free thought would be eliminated, then that architecture would be just a pile of junk. that is to suggest that military domination is self negating, ie futile.

frank zappa was perhaps referring to this domination structure, the real prison when he said:

<The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theatre. - Frank Zappa>

he may have meant it is all the theatre, that there is no man behind the curtain. empires are built on manipulation, much goes on back stage before being playe out in the public theatre.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 10:09 PM

in part due to the self defeating prophecy of control, global hegemony, full spectrum dominance and all that stuff, with free thinking one can realise and unleash a true strength more powerful than the military complex as it negates it; simply reality.

unlike the task of continuous warfare to conquer minds, releasing them is to give people what they already have, their own minds. i see it happening as it must to avoid cataclism. the more this happens the less casualty there will be and the more recovery there will be from previous wars and empires, the incumbant included.

reality goes unseen rather than hidden, often denied rather than unknown. it is when seen as obvious as the folly of our history, our present and lives lived in the cognitive dissonance the controlled media and societal operators project and protect.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 10:22 PM

if one looks at a societal construct, a system based on control, it requires continuous war, plots it on a timeline, it is heading for failure from the off. a quote i see as expressing this is:

<Ruin is the destruction toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest in a society that believes in the freedom of the commons. Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all. - Garrett Hardin>

the controlled media uses reframed arguments to further a premade decision, the political agenda. it does so in attempts to manufacture consent and to eliminate opposition. it puts up a construct that is or supports the agenda, puts up a negation so at the end people have been through both sides an end with balance as if nothing has changed. everything has changed, crime is the most profitable business on earth and new laws allow the commission of serious organised crime whilst eliminating competition.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 10:36 PM

demo cracy in action

a number was being done on the people recently with the construct of a 'mining disaster'. peole were led through what i would call a shakespear cartoon, ie absurd nonsense presented but with drama pulling on people's empathy for 'trapped miners'. we were told bodies were recovered, their names were read out as on 9/11 remembrance. the story was that a wall collapsed leading to flooding and the public is then taken to the issue of how this could be avoided. the issue is raised that there needs to be identification of water deposity, stephen nolan giving the game away i thought by saying 'i thought that was coming next' or similar when there was a cut.

dark side of the moon

the listener with a logical mind, but with blinkers (often robust blinkers with educated minds), is likely to have believed they had the idea that is the solution to 'preventing further disaster' themselves. no, this is military psyops and how general mind control works, by having people believe it was their idea. in reality, by consenting to power to control all land and water supply is in reality agreeing to hand over the entire population of the planet to total domination based not on fuel but the survival necessary of drinking water. having thinking done for you by the media is often of the form (by outer meaning): one small step by a human (the astronaut who is reframed), one giant leap for humankind (towards oblivion). the true context reveals this.

what wasn't mentioned was monopolising water was the policy put out by the royal society, put out by the systems that predictively program mass populations with this agenda and it was the role of the bbc to sell the minds of the audience to the agenda. the agenda announced was that the oil racket would be taken down and replaced by orchestated shortages and total monopoly of water, a timeline where considerable progess to domination has already been achieved over many years.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 11:11 PM

due to the official realm with reverse merit system here on earth, people exchange freedom for privilege and it makes for robust denial (mind control) when it is perceived that privileges are protected by denial not to mention the effects that group constructs have on people. there is much happening, of necessity there is much happening but zooming out on the situation as i see it, it approximates to 'we are all in this together' and adopting the presented paradigms play to the war structures which already manifest as madness extensions or megalomania.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 11:22 PM

programs on top of older programs
the original meanings buried
cow jumped over the moon
symbols hidden in nursery rhymes
a secret code

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 11:42 PM

i try to backfill on unriddling the riddler but prioritise that the media will want to present a mind sales sequence in the form of presenting escallating disaster stories so people feel pinned down by this artiliary of trauma shots and thereby having agenda dictated rather than thinking outside of the box presented. the ambulances here are run by 'big military' i noticed when i last looked at the royal society, remote manipulation of things, people, the entire theatre is how minority influence is exerted, mind controlled people being predictable to thresholds. allowing dominant narratives to be run by the controlled media has by their own admission been much of how we are in this position.

if the traumas can be sold, they will be repeated, if they can gain momentum, all manner of stuff can be done behind such distraction. if there is perception of escallating attrocity, the unconscious interpretation could be that the earth is falling apart not deconstruction and transformation of constructs. there is likely some bunker mentality in play where for political reasons people would want to engineer catastrophy. that is potentially not dissimilar from the end of animal farm.

Posted: Sep 18 2011, 11:50 PM

it helps to know how we got to where we are, to look at the past so that we can see where we are going. trauma, denial, more trauma, more denial, and you end up with nobody knowing much of anything about where we are or how we got here. if people don't know and/or won't admit that they are on a train ride to destruction, how can they possibly prevent the wreck?

the comic strip asks "who decides"
that is the important question

thanks dave

Posted: Sep 19 2011, 11:23 AM

205209 Was this cartoon supposed to represent a complete thought? It's even less substantial than a bumper sticker.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 12:05 PM

i do not choose to be imprisoned by my perceptions of what some author intended, religions do that, the cartoon presented as the official 9/11 story did that. nor do i choose to have cognitive dissonance by jumping into a presented context without knowing what i am leaving. a frame of reference i try to look to is physical reality, my thinking depends on that. no food no life, being surrounded by brainbusted people who are participating in the agenda to regress them from brainbusted to some other form of life, perhaps just an atom in a desperate attempt to maintain a control function, is a reality i disagree with. thought police and all that. boo to that nuisance factory.

i mentioned by intention such things as global water theft as if i give priority to facts and i do, that strikes me as non trivial.

the cartoon mentions fairness. if i want unfairness in a human system, i seperate action and consequence by seperating the decider with as much distance (layers of people) as possible. i was flashing the car lights like mad many years ago driving out of cardiff, driving the other way was a fleet of cars. they had launched one of those ape cons, a welsh assembly and there were a load off SS cars with covert flashing lights escorting a new puppet king walla walla like they do in america. the distance is the danger, with freedom people themselves decide, those that disagree are before them, not some muppet.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 12:13 PM

one can show disconnections by putting together an argument. for example, the way i figure it, if david cameron was not an imposter and he himself wants to go have a revolution in libya, give him some weapons and parachute him in there. let him fight without the clandestine operators and net controllers clearing his path, if he is a leader let him lead. if he survives let him come back to london with his clothes dripping with blood to the praise of the brotherhoods and sisterhoods that seek conquestion to witness.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 12:14 PM

67171 The cartoon is a representation of the Third Way political movement, aka "communitarianism" -- look it up!

Communitarianism is collectivist. So, you have the group needs versus the individual's needs. Individual freedoms are group freedoms, however.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 12:16 PM

somebody said to me, "I bother to realize that those people are really my friends in a way."

i think he's right. i've got nothing against most people, even the ones trapped inside a system that demands you (the word "you" meaning all of us) lie for your living. i do happen to believe they bought into a line of bullshit, however, and i also believe that if i never speak up, then my voice will never be heard. some folks try to silence any dissonant voice, believing in the good of the group, and only hearing the chorus of good/groupthink. that isn't their fault. nobody needs to be blamed for any of it, but i feel responsible for saying what i think about how harmful i see it. and the way i see it, if we aren't deciding for ourselves, there is no freedom. if we are only allowed to answer "yes" as per newspeak demands of us, we aren't deciding. the ability to say "NO" is very empowering, something all humans are born with. just ask any parent with a toddler aged child if you doubt me.

(edit to add the following)
quote wiki:
The basic idea behind Newspeak is to remove all shades of meaning from language, leaving simple dichotomies (pleasure and pain, happiness and sadness, goodthink and crimethink) which reinforce the total dominance of the State.
...The ultimate aim of Newspeak was to reduce even the dichotomies to a single word that was a "yes" of some sort: an obedient word with which everyone answered affirmatively to what was asked of them.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 9:26 PM

in response to 67171, i didn't know the name of the program despite it running throughout AI's domain and loyal servants. your post has helped to resolve some scraps of information i was wrestling with. resolved now thanks. had i known, this wouldn't have changed my decision not to register with what was presented.

<believing in the good of the group>
what i tend to encounter is the pathology of belief in the group, not belief in 'group'. the systems we have are military in function, acting on 'vengeful gods'. despite all the presentations, skins like 'communitarianism', it is a shadow system. people when questioned in a military group tend to present disconnection to hide that there is anything behind the group mask. safety in the group really being of the form they are attacked if they express who they really are. there have been exceptions, division of course evaporates in such circumstances hence div V to try to prevent this from happening.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:05 PM

i don't look necessarily at whether something presented is authentic or not, i take the stimulation and monitor my own thoughts. for protection against brainbusting i observe my reactions to what is presented and to pickup pre-existing contamination i monitor what comes in and goes out. something i was reading was:

<In order to induce a high state of hypnogogy in an individual, a group, or a population, an element of terror must always be present on the part of those who would govern. The psychiatrist is aptly suited to this role, for his brutalities are committed in the name of science and are inexplicably complex and entirely out of view of the human understanding. A sufficient popular terror of the psychiatrist will, in itself, bring about insanity on the part of many individuals. A psychopolitical operative then can — entirely cloaked with authority — commence and continue a campaign of propaganda describing various “treatments” which are administered to the insane. A psychopolitical operative should at all times insist that these treatments are therapeutic and necessary. He can, in all of his literature and his books, list large numbers of pretended cures by these means. But these “cures” need not actually produce any recovery from a state of disturbance. As
long as the psychopolitical operative or his dupes are the only authorities as to the difference between sanity and insanity,
their word as to the therapeutic value of such treatment will be the final word. No layman would dare adventure to place judgment upon the state of sanity of an individual whom the psychiatrist has already declared insane. The individual, himself, is unable to complain. And his family, as will be covered later, is already discredited by the occurrence of insanity in their midst. There must be no other adjudicators of insanity, otherwise it could be disclosed that the brutalities practiced in the name of treatment are not therapeutic.

A psychopolitical operative has no interest in “therapeutic means” or “cures.” The greater number of insane in the country where he is operating, the larger number of the populace will come under his view and the greater will become his facilities.>

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:05 PM

<Because the problem is apparently mounting into uncontrollable heights, he can more and more operate in an atmosphere of emergency which, again, excuses his use of such treatments as electric shock, the prefrontal lobotomy, transorbital
leucotomy, and other operations long-since practiced in Russia on political prisoners.
It is to the interest of the psychopolitical operative that the possibility of curing the insane be outlawed and ruled out at all times. For the sake of obedience on the part of the population and their general reaction, a level of brutality must, at all costs, be maintained. Only in this way can the absolute judgment of the psychopolitical operative as to the sanity or insanity
of public figures be maintained in complete belief. Using sufficient brutality upon their patients, the public at large will
come to believe utterly anything they say about their patients.>

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:09 PM

<Furthermore, and much more important, the field of the mind must be sufficiently dominated by the psychopolitical operative
so that wherever tenets of the mind are taught, they will be hypnotically believed. The psychopolitical operative, having
under his control all psychology classes in an area, can thus bring about a complete reformation of the future leaders of a country in their educational processes ..>

it was interesting to read as i see it as relevant. knowing this is done now on a global basis, one can talk to people and awareness of their mental health reveals much about political activity and nature in the area.

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:13 PM

listening to what was outwardly presented as a 9/11 remembrance, stephen nolan, likely tavistocked himself, was presenting an 'american soldier' who just wanted to serve. what the bbc were doing was visible (presenting what to them was an achievement) and this is echoed here:

<On the subject of obedience itself, the most optimum obedience is unthinking obedience. The command given must be obeyed without any rationalizing on the part of the Subject. The command must, therefore, be implanted below the thinking processes of the Subject to be influenced, and must react upon him in such a way as to bring no mental alertness on his part.>

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:23 PM

something one sees often in politics:

<Exercises in sexual attack on patients should be practiced by the psychopolitical operative in order to demonstrate the inability of the patient under pain-drug hypnosis to recall the attack. In addition, this indoctrinates a lust for further sexual activity on the part of the patient. Sex, in all animals, is a powerful motivator, and is no less so in the animal Man. And the occasioning of sexual liaison between females of a target family and indicated males, under the control of the psychopolitical operative, must be demonstrated to be possible with complete security for the psychopolitical operative. This gives into his hands an excellent weapon for the breaking down of familial relations and consequent public disgraces for the psychopolitical target.>

Posted: Sep 20 2011, 11:29 PM

<Experiments on German prisoners have lately demonstrated that only after seventy days of filthy food, little sleep, and nearly untenable quarters, that the least motion toward the prisoner would bring about a state of shock beyond his endurance threshold, and would cause him to hypnotically receive anything said to him. Thus, it is possible in an entire stockade of prisoners to the number of thousands, to bring about a state of complete servile obedience and, without the labor of personally addressing each one, to pervert their loyalties and implant in them adequate commands to insure their future conduct even when released to their own people.

By lowering the endurance of a person, a group, or a nation; and by constant degradation and defamation, it is possible to induce, thus, a state of shock which will receive adequately any command given.>
Comments 1 - 20 of 26 Page of 2 >

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder - 11/27Georgia Sheriff Puts Up Sign Warning People Who Disagree With Him About God to Leave - 11/27World's Most 'Adorable' Drug Kingpin Is Actually The Daughter of Texas DEA Head Honcho - 11/26Pot Breathalyzers: Coming Soon to A Drug War Near You - 11/27City Settles After Police Chief Arrested Man For Calling Public Official A 'Liar' - 11/27Heroic Cops Protect Community by Raiding a Group of 90-Yo Women Playing Mahjong - 11/26Bezos Beats Musk - 11/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up