informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jul 24 2011, 10:58 AM Category: Commentary Source: Douglas French Print

From 3 to 4,500: What laws have you broken today?

by Douglas French, Mises Blog

The U.S. Constitution mentions three federal crimes by citizens: treason, piracy and counterfeiting. Today, there are an estimated 4,500 crimes in federal statutes, write Gary Fields and John R. Emshwiller for the Wall Street Journal.

Clarence Darrow anticipated the prison nation that America is today a hundred years ago in his book Resist Not Evil.  All areas of life have become part of the penal code, with an army of people operating as police, legislators, and the court system to enforce these laws through force and violence.  But even Darrow wouldn’t have dreamed that the unauthorized use of the Smokey Bear image, or of the slogan “Give a Hoot, Don’t Pollute” can land a person in federal prison.

Fields and Emshwiller’s frightening article tells about a father and son chased by the Feds for unknowingly digging on federal ground for arrowheads.  “The Andersons are two of the hundreds of thousands of Americans to be charged and convicted in recent decades under federal criminal laws--as opposed to state or local laws--as the federal justice system has dramatically expanded its authority and reach.”

The Amercian Bar Association can’t  even tally up the federal offenses exactly but believe the number exceeds 3,000.  The ABA’s report said “the amount of individual citizen behavior now potentially subject to federal criminal control has increased in astonishing proportions in the last few decades.”

A Justice spokeswoman told the WSJ, that there was no quantifiable number. “Criminal statutes are sprinkled throughout some 27,000 pages of the federal code,” write Fields and Emshwiller.

These crimes of the state’s making are sending 83,000 people a year to federal prison.  While the US population has grown 36% in the past three decades, three times more people are going to prison, with immigration and drug violations making up over 60% of the offenses in 2010.  The federal prison population has grown eight fold during this period.

Of course much of the public cheers on the increasing prison state.
Roscoe Howard, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, argues that the system “isn’t broken.” Congress, he says, took its cue over the decades from a public less tolerant of certain behaviors. Current law provides a range of options to protect society, he says. “It would be horrible if they started repealing laws and taking those options away.”
One wonders if Howard believes 77-year-old race-car legend Bobby Unser deserves to have a criminal record “for accidentally driving a snowmobile onto protected federal land, violating the Wilderness Act, while lost in a snowstorm.”  Or whether a Pennsylvania woman who violated a 1998 federal chemical-weapons law tied to an international arms-control treaty should spend six years in prison.  The woman spread some chemicals that burned her husband’s paramour on the thumb.

The woman has challenged the law’s constitutionality and the Supreme Court is sympathetic.
During oral arguments in the case, Justice Samuel Alito expressed concern about the law’s “breadth” by laying out a hypothetical example. Simply pouring a bottle of vinegar into a bowl to kill someone’s goldfish, Justice Alito said, could be “potentially punishable by life imprisonment.”
And this is today’s justice system?  Darrow wrote in 1902,
the state furnishes no machinery for arriving at justice. [It] has no way of arriving at the facts. If the state pretends to administer justice this should be its highest concern. It should not be interested in convicting men or punishing crime, but administering justice between men. It is obvious to the most casual observer that the state furnishes no machinery to accomplish this result.





Latest Commentary
- Follow the Silk Road
- Sometimes We Crash
- The Raping Of America: Mile Markers On The Road To Fascism
- Captured, Cuffed, and Jailed: A Personal Story
- Why Government Policing Monopolies Can Neither Serve Nor Protect You
- We Are the Government: Tactics for Taking Down the Police State
- Capitalists Have a Better Plan
- The War on Air Conditioning Heats Up









Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Dave

Posted: Jul 26 2011, 6:43 AM

Link
<The U.S. Constitution mentions three federal crimes by citizens: treason, piracy and counterfeiting.>

if setting up a pirate's heaven protection in the form of treason, piracy and counterfeiting make sense. 'do as i say, don't do as i do (or go to jail).

as people will get restless and intolerant of the pirate and his protectors having so much of the american pie the lever of power is ratcheted up, ratcheted up, ratcheted up.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 28 2011, 11:57 AM

Link
7592 Yeah, yesterday I know for a fact that I broke a few laws, and I don't give a damn. I smoked pot yesterday and I did drugs. I walked over a bridge deliberately opposite the pedestrian side...not to make a statement, simply because I was too high to cross a busy highway, and when I thought it was safe to cross over, I did. The police were called by some do gooder who pretended to be "concerned" for my safety. I handed over my ID, was checked, and allowed to on my way......high as a kite. Fuck the stupid police.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Officer Filmed Punching Pregnant Veteran Cleared Of Wrongdoing - 08/27Police are So Scared of Jury Nullification they Defy Judge's Order and Unlawfully Removed Activists - 08/27Social Media Study Reveals Half Of Americans Hate Their Police Dept. - 08/27Trump: The Problem is Not Guns, It is Mental Illness - 08/27Follow the Silk Road - 08/27This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories - 08/27Jim Grant: The Fed Turned the Stock Market Into a 'Hall of Mirrors' - 08/27CNN Tells Americans That The Stock Market Is Not Going To Crash - 08/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top