The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC BlogJul. 20, 2011 |
Israel's Chickens Come Home to Roost
Jon Stewart and Steven Levitksky: The Constitution is 'The Problem'
Ben Shapiro: It's an 'Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theory' to Say Congress Banning TikTok for Israel
U.S. House Rams Through Bill to Ban TikTok
Gaza on Brink of Mass Starvation and Death, U.N.-Backed Monitor Reports
It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be. |