informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jul 01 2010, 11:57 PM Category: General Source: Weasel Zippers Print

Union Goons Attack Non-Union Construction Workers With Baseball Bats Outside Toys R Us Building Site...

WeaselZippers.us

Example #2,989,652 of why unions have no place in modern-America…
Violence erupted at a King of Prussia construction site Wednesday, and today, police are seeking the public’s help to apprehend some bat-wielding assailants.

Upper Merion Township police gave this account:

Officers responded at 7:10 a.m. Wednesday to the King of Prussia Plaza area of Mall Boulevard for reports that union protestors were blocking the entranceway to the new Toys R Us building site. While en route, an assault was reported in the mall parking lot.

Upon arrival, police found two construction trucks with their rear windows completely shattered, and one victim bleeding from the head. The victims said they were blocked by numerous union protesters from entering the construction site, and so they drove to the mall area to await police assistance.

A short time later, a black sedan pulled up and several men exited with baseball bats, ran up to the two trucks and repeatedly slammed the bats into the windows. As the workers exited the trucks, at least two were then physically assaulted with the baseball bats, and one victim had to be hospitalized. Another victim was able to use his cell phone to photograph the assailants and their vehicle.

Police said the construction site is being protested by Local 401 of the Iron Workers Union.

Rest here »





Latest General
- Seahawks Coach Admired by '9/11 Truth' Movement
- Jesse Ventura On 'American Sniper' Chris Kyle: 'A Hero Must Be Honorable... You Can't Have Honor If You're A Liar'
- Facebook Blocks Images of Muhammad
- Video: Americans Want Obama to Repeal the Bill of Rights
- American Sniper Movie Summed Up By 4Chan [Image]
- Seth Rogen Slams 'American Sniper,' Reminds Him Of Fictional Nazi Propaganda From 'Inglourious Basterds'
- 'American Sniper' Complaints Grow in Hollywood: Should Clint Eastwood Be Celebrating a 'Killer'?
- Ross Ulbricht's Lawyers Claim That Mt. Gox CEO Was The Real Dread Pirate Roberts









Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Peter

Posted: Jul 02 2010, 9:07 AM

Link
95211 "..unions have no place in modern-America…"
My God, you Yanks are seriously brainwashed .
How do you think European workers got 6 weeks vacation, 35-38 hours weekly labour, minimum-wages that you can in fact live on with only one full-time job, pension, healthcare and last but not least :
20-25 years longer life-expectancy ?
You think the nice employers just gave it to them because they wanted to share some of "their" immense wealth with the people who created it ?
There is strength in numbers and also in a thing called "solidarity" .
Not that expect Americans to know what that is ...
scientia

Posted: Jul 02 2010, 9:34 AM

Link
@Peter:

How does your "state" pay for all of these programs? Do you only get paid for the 35-38 you actually work or do you get paid for 40 and your employer makes up the difference? Does your healthcare get paid for by every worker or every tax payer? How are minimum-wages set for different skill-level positions?
Bill

Posted: Jul 02 2010, 12:06 PM

Link
24149 scientia, how do you suggest workers push back against exploitation by corporate interests?

IMO, to suggest that there should be no unions is to suggest that corporations can do whatever they want to their workforce.
scientia

Posted: Jul 02 2010, 3:07 PM

Link
@Bill

Since we live in a relatively "free" society we can choose as consumers both of goods and services--employment in this instance--where to put our capital. We have no forced employment in this country the last time I checked. Therefore, if exploitation is allowed to happen it is put upon the consumer's free choice of patronizing a particular employer.

For example; if I am working at my job and my employer suddenly requests that I work 60 hours a week for no extra pay I have two options. I can A) work those 60 hours since I am free to decide that or B) take my capital investment, ie my labor, elsewhere. There is no requirement to stay in a position as I said earlier; we live in a free society. It is in our nature to seek stability, familiarity and comfort. By choosing option B we remove those things that we seek. We are required to be industrious and find a new employer in the market or to change markets if that is required. For if another worker chooses to take my old job and invest his/her capital into the former employer then the market has spoken and the employer can continue their ways. But if the conditions worsened to the point of mass walkouts and migrations to other employers/indutries then the employer would be forced to A) close business or B) improve conditions. Now you go, "A-ha, that's why unions exist". And in your assumption you have now given birth to a new exploiter; the Union.

Unfortunately the power to exploit is now placed in the hands of the unions as "corporate interests" exist for solely one purpose; profit. An entrepreneur needs labor to convert capital into "money", money is used to cover expenses, and whatever is money is left over is a profit. If a company is unable to cover it's expenses with it's revenue the labor cost must be cut. Once the labor cost is reduced expenses can be covered with revenues and the difference is now put into savings to invest in more capital. However, when the union refuses to budge a company is forced to start reducing other expenses; like payroll. And in order to reduce payroll there must either be a reduction in the workforce or a lowering of the wages for if not there is not enough revenue to cover the expenses and no profit=no company. No company=no jobs.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 02 2010, 10:45 PM

Link
72223 RE: Peter Posted: Jul 02 2010, 9:07 AM

"Not that expect Americans to know what that is ... "

Thanks for that Peter.
America is so dumbed down!

scientia

Posted: Jul 04 2010, 11:07 PM

Link
@Anon72223: "America is so dumbed down!"

Couldn't have said it more eloquently myself. With most citizens dazzled by panem et circenses our government has transformed itself into the invisible hand. Not that it's bad enough as-is but you are promoting yet another group that monopolizes coercion?

So how would one, ie yourself, propose we attach all of these extra costs touted by Peter to our currently over-regulated producers? Price increases, taxes or "quantitative easing"?
Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Another Reason Uber Gets Banned: DUIs Are An Essential Revenue Stream - 01/29Video: Americans Want Obama to Repeal the Bill of Rights - 01/26Police Label Hippy Group Whose Message Is "Peace & Love" 'Domestic Extremists' - 01/30Quebec Woman Suing Cop Who Left Her Locked In Back Of Police Truck With Man Who Ended Up Raping Her - 01/31New Mexico Grand Jury Finds Police Shooting Unjustified, DA Refuses to Prosecute - 01/30Dash Cam Video Shows Seattle Cop Falsified Charge Against Elderly Man Walking Down Street - 01/29Ex-Gf Of Seattle Cop Says She Smoked Pot Stolen From Evidence, Referred To Blacks As N*****s - 01/31Canada Unveils New Anti-Terrorism Bill That Moves for 'Unprecedented Expansion of Powers' - 01/31

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top