informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jun 24 2010, 9:00 PM Category: Health Source: AFP Print

US snuffs out 'light' cigarettes


WASHINGTON A US law banning the selling of so-called "light" or "mild" cigarettes took effect Tuesday, but some anti-tobacco groups say the makers are sidestepping the rules by using color-coding packaging.

The measure signed into law a year ago by President Barack Obama regulates tobacco for the first time and prohibits, starting Tuesday, packaging using the terms "light," "mild," or "low" -- which could lead smokers into believing they are not as harmful.

But regulators and tobacco firms are still battling over how the new measure will be implemented.

Some say that color-coding packs and switching to terms such as "gold" and "silver" instead of "light" and "ultra-light" are efforts to continue misleading consumers.

"With a wink and a nod, the tobacco industry has found new ways to continue their deceptive marketing practices to circumvent the new regulations," said Charles Connor, president of the American Lung Association.

"For example, they must drop the word 'light' in their packaging, but have already made it clear to their customers that if they want lights, they just need to look for a package in a specific color, such as gold.

The FDA sent a letter last week to Philip Morris USA questioning the terms included in Marlboro Lights packs before the ban.

The packaging says, "Your Marlboro Lights pack is changing. But your cigarette stays the same. In the future, ask for 'Marlboro in the gold pack.'"

The FDA asked for documentation from the cigarette maker to determine if it was deliberately circumventing the law.

"We applaud the FDA's action," said Matthew Myers of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

"We call on Philip Morris to go beyond the actions called for by the FDA and immediately stop" using these materials, Myers said.

"Any activity that misleads consumers into believing that certain cigarettes are safer and discourages smokers from quitting is harmful to public health."

Other new anti-smoking restrictions also came into effect Tuesday. The new rules will bar tobacco company sponsorship of athletic, musical or cultural events, restrict distribution of free samples and prohibit sales of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to people younger than 18.

"As we complete our first year executing this important new responsibility, FDA has much to be proud of and much yet to do to improve public health through effective tobacco regulation," said FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg.

Copyright 2010 AFP. All rights reserved.





Latest Health
- Study: Obese Americans Now Outnumber Those Who Are Merely Overweight
- Public School "Child Nutrition Supervisor" Served Students Reeking, Six-Year-Old Pork
- SSRI Drugs Linked to Germanwings Kamikaze Crash?
- Shocker: Eat Fat, Avoid Food Pyramid, Lose Weight
- Parents ARE Being Arrested For Getting Medicine (Cannabis Oil) That Works For Their Sick Children!
- More LIVING PROOF The NEW Miracle Drug "Marijuana" Helps Heal The Sick
- How Medical Pot Is Helping Seniors Get Off (Prescription) Drugs
- The Government and "Balanced" Meals









Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
scientia

Posted: Jun 25 2010, 12:22 PM

Link
If you are dumb enough to believe a light cigarette won't harm you as much as a "full flavor" cigarette you deserve to reduce your carbon footprint to zero and vacate said planet.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 25 2010, 2:24 PM

Link
16295 jesus christ, everyone who smokes knows its going to kill them and lights dont help them live longer.....u know why....cause you cram these shit ass studies down our throats every chance you get and then sit there and have the audacity to act like some people still think the only side effect of smoking is looking cool....GTFO

Johnny Gee

Posted: Oct 28 2010, 9:50 PM

Link
98243 There is no expectation of a safe cigarette-one of the reasons the gov't doesnt have to test the new fire retardent cigarettes for safety in humans. THEY ARE MANDATORY NOW ALMOST EVERYWHERE!.
Ask Barack if he has FSC in his smokes? I'll bet you he doesn't.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 12 2011, 12:20 PM

Link
76183 Smokers who choose light cigarettes do so because they've less harsh to the lungs. Some can't smoke regular cigarettes because they hurt their lungs too much. "LIght" simply means lighter on your lungs. None of us believe the word "light" implies any health benefits. But, some of us are aware of the "Natural" cigarettes containing none of the 300 or so toxic chemicals added to national brands, and that these cigarettes pose much lower health risks than those with the added chemicals. If they don't use the word "light" how can we know which cigarettes will be lightest on our lungs?


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

In Under a Minute, this Cop Shows Exactly Why People are Losing Faith in Police - 08/02Police Pose As Construction Crew To Extort Texting Drivers - 07/31NYPD Thugs Assault Business Owner As He Closes Shop - 08/03'I Can Detain You For Not Talking to Me!': WI Police Officer Harasses Open Carry Activists, Demands They Leave the City - 08/03Teenager Sues Police After Being Jailed for 40 Days Over a Snowball Then Cleared of Wrongdoing - 08/03Man Threatened With Charges After Catching Post Office Delivering Mail Into Dumpster - 08/04VIDEO: Hillary Supporters Call For Repealing Bill of Rights - 08/03Man Arrested, Charged with Multiple Felonies for Telling Jurors About Their Rights - 08/04

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top