The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted May 30 2010, 9:54 AM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: The New American Print

Obama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial

by Thomas R. Eddlem

President Obama's Guantanamo Review Task Force has “unanimously” concluded that 48 detainees at Guantanamo should be detained indefinitely — in essence, a life sentence — without trial, including lifetime detention for some detainees who, the commission concluded, hadn't committed any crimes that “constitute a chargeable offense in either a federal court or military commission.” The Washington Post revealed May 28 that the Task Force decided to repatriate the majority of the 240 detainees they investigated, while other detainees should be tried in criminal court or by “military commissions” the Obama administration would reconstitute.

Most Guantanamo detainees have already languished in prison for eight years without trial, and the commission — consisting of officials from the intelligence, military, Defense, Homeland Security, State and Justice departments — concluded the following of the 48 detainees who would remain in prison without trial indefinitely:
Generally these detainees cannot be prosecuted because either there is presently insufficient admissible evidence to establish the detainee's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in either a federal court or military commission, or the detainee's conduct does not constitute a chargeable offense in either a federal court or military commission.
In other words, the Obama administration officials think the detainees might have committed a crime but can't be sure, or they are sure the detainees didn't commit a crime and want to keep them in prison for life anyway.

The untrammeled power of government to throw people into prison without a trial by jury was a key grievance the Founding Fathers cited in their reason for separating from Britain, charging the British with “depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of trial by jury” in the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, the Founding Fathers sought to require both due process of law for all those arrested in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
No person shall be ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
And they also guaranteed an unqualified right to trial by jury in the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Of course, the 48 designated for life imprisonment without trial is only the beginning. The U.S. government holds hundreds of other detainees at other prisons around the world, such as those at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan (which has more detainees than Guantanamo). The “unanimous” but blatantly unconstitutional precedent set by this ruling could mean that these other detainees — or anyone else the Obama administration detains — could also receive life imprisonment without trial under the Obama policy.

The Task Force concluded that 126 detainees should be approved for repatriation to their home countries (of which 44 have already been released), 44 should be prosecuted (prosecution of six in federal court and six more in “military tribunals” has already been announced), and 48 are designated for indefinite detention without trial. An additional 30 Yemeni detainees were deemed to be eligible for repatriation to their home country when the Yemeni government stabilizes.

The trial by “military commissions” would also be a blatant violation of the Sixth Amendment's requirement of trial by jury of peers as well as its requirement that the “district shall have been previously ascertained by law.” In the case of the military tribunals, the district will be created eight years after the offense and specifically to get convictions in alleged crimes that occurred years earlier.

The Task Force reviewed the cases of the 240 who remained in the Cuban military base in early 2009 when President Obama ordered the review. Of the 779 people who were detained at Guantanamo since 2002, not one has yet been given a criminal trial under either the ordinary criminal (civilian) process or the Uniform Code of Military Justice reserved to members of armed forces. Two-thirds of the detainees (530 of the 779) were released or repatriated to their home countries. Several detainees were convicted under unconstitutional “military commissions,” first by the Bush administration and later by Congress' Military Commissions Act of 2006, but the Supreme Court ruled the military commissions unconstitutional in successive cases, ending in the famous Boumediene case in 2008.

The Obama administration's justification for holding the 48 detainees for life without a trial is the 2001 Authorization of the Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed by Congress. In essence, the Obama administration claims that a mere law passed by Congress overcomes the explicit and unequivocal wording of the Constitution's Bill of Rights. The Task Force rationalized the decision for indefinite detention this way:
As the Supreme Court has held, inherent within the authorization of the AUMF to “use all necessary and appropriate force” is the power to detain any individuals who fall within the scope of the statute. As the Supreme Court observed, “by universal agreement and practice,” the power to wage war necessarily includes the authority to capture and detain combatants in order to prevent them from “returning to the field of battle and taking up arms once again.”
This determination by the Guantanamo Review Task Force represents the final victory of the policies of George W. Bush in the Obama administration, and is in many respects constitutionally worse than the Bush policy. The Bush administration talked about holding people indefinitely, but there was always the hope that trials or release would eventually be obtained. The Guantanamo Review Task Force makes the Bush policy explicit, bipartisan, and permanent. It contitutes the first case in American history where the U.S. government has explicitly concluded that it has the power to lock up anyone for life without ever holding a trial of any kind.

There is no greater mark of tyranny than a government that can throw a person into prison for life at the whim of an executive without any sort of impartial review. But the Obama administration makes this arbitrary power worse when its Guantanamo Review Task Force admits that some of those it is throwing into prison for life have not committed a crime. That's precisely what the review said when it admitted that some detainees being selected for lifetime detention without a trial had not committed anything that would “constitute a chargeable offense in either a federal court or military commission.”

Many should now be asking: If this decision is allowed to stand, can we still call America the “land of the free”? And if freedom-loving Americans don't work to return their government to the Constitution, are we still the “home of the brave”?

Photo: AP Images

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Pot Breathalyzers: Coming Soon to A Drug War Near You
- City Settles After Police Chief Arrested Man For Calling Public Official A 'Liar'
- Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder
- World's Most 'Adorable' Drug Kingpin Is Actually The Daughter of Texas DEA Head Honcho
- Heroic Cops Protect Community by Raiding a Group of 90-Yo Women Playing Mahjong
- VIDEO: Language Barrier Leads to Seattle Cops Punching Man 17 Times
- Video Of Chicago Cop Murdering Teen Shows Another Shooting of Convenience
- California Police Used Illegal Wiretap Warrants in Hundreds of Drug Prosecutions

Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: May 30 2010, 7:52 PM

20959 "The election of Barack Obama as the first black president in a once deeply racist United States are 'clear signs of human beings being more mature' "
-- The Dalai Lama

Therefore, mature human beings must endorse innocents be imprisoned for life... right??

Posted: May 31 2010, 3:55 AM

150101 this is outrageous!

Posted: May 31 2010, 10:10 AM

9956 Of course there is a huge difference between having evidence, and having "admissable" evidence, as mentioned in the article. Many a guilty person has hone free due to lack of admissable evidence. The workings of the court system are are intended to protect the innocent, but can also be used to protect the guilty. Other than his own words, do we have admissable evidence against Bin Laden?

Posted: May 31 2010, 3:37 PM

I posted this on my blog line at and tweeted this to FaceBook, MySpace, and LinkedIn.

on the comment thread at BlueMoon wrote at 5/30/2010 8:37:41 PM

"There is no greater mark of tyranny than a government that can throw a person into prison for life at the whim of an executive without any sort of impartial review." ~~~~ Name ONE Guantanamo detainee who was detained at the whim of an executive without any sort of impartial review.

Can anyone provide a link or other information to respond to this comment? I am new at this site and wanna back up what Eddlem wrote.

Thanks for any help y'all can provide.

Doc Ellis 124

Posted: May 31 2010, 3:58 PM

Hey docellis124, every single person in GITMO was detained at the whim of the executive without any sort of impartial review. Only after being held for years without trial were a few tried in military tribunals, almost all of them were released because they had no absolutely evidence against them.

Read the articles here:

Tons more:
Corey Mondello

Posted: Jul 16 2010, 4:34 PM

7293 Obama is just continuing Bush policy. Noone seemed to complain about it when Bush was in the WH.

Do you know what I was ALWAYS told when discussing my disagreement with Bush admin: "If you don't like this country, you American hater, go live in Cuba." and many variations, but all saying basically the same thing.

Do you know what I said back ALWAYS; "I cannot wait to hear you whine when the next president in the WH is a Democrat, who does the same thing the Bush admin does."

Posted: Jul 30 2010, 5:09 PM

17429 Obama is set to be the smartest, worst president we've ever had.
I hope to campaign for Senate or the House when I come of age. I just hope that our country will still exist when the time comes.

Posted: Aug 22 2010, 5:27 PM

Sad that so many have warned of these things and only to have it in our faces all the more. By desing!!!
Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder - 11/27Georgia Sheriff Puts Up Sign Warning People Who Disagree With Him About God to Leave - 11/27World's Most 'Adorable' Drug Kingpin Is Actually The Daughter of Texas DEA Head Honcho - 11/26Pot Breathalyzers: Coming Soon to A Drug War Near You - 11/27City Settles After Police Chief Arrested Man For Calling Public Official A 'Liar' - 11/27Heroic Cops Protect Community by Raiding a Group of 90-Yo Women Playing Mahjong - 11/26Bezos Beats Musk - 11/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up