informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jun 06 2008, 5:58 AM Category: Geopolitics Source: The Independent Print

Revealed: Secret plan to keep Iraq under US control

By Patrick Cockburn

Bush wants 50 military bases, control of Iraqi airspace and legal immunity for all American soldiers and contractors

A secret deal being negotiated in Baghdad would perpetuate the American military occupation of Iraq indefinitely, regardless of the outcome of the US presidential election in November.

The terms of the impending deal, details of which have been leaked to The Independent, are likely to have an explosive political effect in Iraq. Iraqi officials fear that the accord, under which US troops would occupy permanent bases, conduct military operations, arrest Iraqis and enjoy immunity from Iraqi law, will destabilise Iraq's position in the Middle East and lay the basis for unending conflict in their country.

But the accord also threatens to provoke a political crisis in the US. President Bush wants to push it through by the end of next month so he can declare a military victory and claim his 2003 invasion has been vindicated. But by perpetuating the US presence in Iraq, the long-term settlement would undercut pledges by the Democratic presidential nominee, Barack Obama, to withdraw US troops if he is elected president in November.

The timing of the agreement would also boost the Republican candidate, John McCain, who has claimed the United States is on the verge of victory in Iraq a victory that he says Mr Obama would throw away by a premature military withdrawal.

America currently has 151,000 troops in Iraq and, even after projected withdrawals next month, troop levels will stand at more than 142,000 10 000 more than when the military "surge" began in January 2007. Under the terms of the new treaty, the Americans would retain the long-term use of more than 50 bases in Iraq. American negotiators are also demanding immunity from Iraqi law for US troops and contractors, and a free hand to carry out arrests and conduct military activities in Iraq without consulting the Baghdad government.

The precise nature of the American demands has been kept secret until now. The leaks are certain to generate an angry backlash in Iraq. "It is a terrible breach of our sovereignty," said one Iraqi politician, adding that if the security deal was signed it would delegitimise the government in Baghdad which will be seen as an American pawn.

The US has repeatedly denied it wants permanent bases in Iraq but one Iraqi source said: "This is just a tactical subterfuge." Washington also wants control of Iraqi airspace below 29,000ft and the right to pursue its "war on terror" in Iraq, giving it the authority to arrest anybody it wants and to launch military campaigns without consultation.

Mr Bush is determined to force the Iraqi government to sign the so-called "strategic alliance" without modifications, by the end of next month. But it is already being condemned by the Iranians and many Arabs as a continuing American attempt to dominate the region. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the powerful and usually moderate Iranian leader, said yesterday that such a deal would create "a permanent occupation". He added: "The essence of this agreement is to turn the Iraqis into slaves of the Americans."

Iraq's Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, is believed to be personally opposed to the terms of the new pact but feels his coalition government cannot stay in power without US backing.

The deal also risks exacerbating the proxy war being fought between Iran and the United States over who should be more influential in Iraq.

Although Iraqi ministers have said they will reject any agreement limiting Iraqi sovereignty, political observers in Baghdad suspect they will sign in the end and simply want to establish their credentials as defenders of Iraqi independence by a show of defiance now. The one Iraqi with the authority to stop deal is the majority Shia spiritual leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. In 2003, he forced the US to agree to a referendum on the new Iraqi constitution and the election of a parliament. But he is said to believe that loss of US support would drastically weaken the Iraqi Shia, who won a majority in parliament in elections in 2005.

The US is adamantly against the new security agreement being put to a referendum in Iraq, suspecting that it would be voted down. The influential Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has called on his followers to demonstrate every Friday against the impending agreement on the grounds that it compromises Iraqi independence.

The Iraqi government wants to delay the actual signing of the agreement but the office of Vice-President Dick Cheney has been trying to force it through. The US ambassador in Baghdad, Ryan Crocker, has spent weeks trying to secure the accord.

The signature of a security agreement, and a parallel deal providing a legal basis for keeping US troops in Iraq, is unlikely to be accepted by most Iraqis. But the Kurds, who make up a fifth of the population, will probably favour a continuing American presence, as will Sunni Arab political leaders who want US forces to dilute the power of the Shia. The Sunni Arab community, which has broadly supported a guerrilla war against US occupation, is likely to be split.





Latest Geopolitics
- CNN/ORC Poll: 66% of Americans Say US Should Remain Neutral in Israel/Palestine Conflict
- Greece Begins The Great Pivot Toward Russia
- Jamaica is About to Decriminalize Ganja
- Documents Show US Enemy ISIS & US Ally Saudi Arabia Prescribe Near-Identical Punishments For Crimes
- Catalonia Overwhelmingly Voices Desire for Independence
- Guatemalan President Will Present Plan to Legalize Marijuana, Opium Production
- Italian Government Cracks Down on Separatists
- Crisis Looms for Addicts as Russia Bans Methadone in Crimea









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dave

Posted: Jun 06 2008, 6:29 PM

Link
<which have been leaked to The Independent>
I think I would call this trying to retake control of the position. The 'secret' isn't 'secret' just increasingly widely realised. Nor is this justified as news, rather the independent is conducting a soap opera by changing the story. No foreign troops (terrorists) should be on Iraqi soil.
phaedra108

Posted: Jun 06 2008, 6:36 PM

Link
Personally, I like the 'Meet Single Arabs Online' ad at the left of this story. She's got nicer boobs than me.

Sorry but how can anyone take anything on this website seriously with that kind of nonsense taking up valuable space? Maybe the Illuminati like pretty Arab girls with nice boobs???

It's a complete sham.

(or maybe my boobs don't really exist.)

(will be back after visiting ArabLounge.com.)
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 07 2008, 2:53 PM

Link
7565 We 'ordinary' citizens knew back in 2004 at the latest that permanent bases were intended. The Downing Street memos - the Bremer edicts - AIPAC's urgings - the Washington conference to divvy up the oil spoils - the obvious launching-pad status of Afghanistan and Iraq for more wars - the CIA's use of the MEK in Iran - and so on and so on and so forth.

So the question now is what to do about the greedy, dishonest, non-elected administration that has treasonously lied our troops, our Constitution, and our economy into useless death.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Video Footage Counters Philadelphia Police Version of Fatal Shooting - 02/25Video Exposes Lying Cop Who Punched a Man in the Face and Charged HIM with Assault - 02/25The Disappeared: Chicago Police Detain Americans At Abuse-Laden 'Black Site' - 02/25Feds Threaten D.C. Officials with Prison If they Go Through with Pot Legalization on Thursday - 02/25Cop Brutally Attacks 78-Year-Old Grandma For Delivering Cupcakes To Her Grandchildren - 02/24"Stop Resisting" Cop Yells After Kneeing Complaint Cuffed Man In Stomach So Hard He Ruptured His Spleen - 02/24Video of Man's Police Interaction Exposes Vast Conspiracy -- This is Why You Always Film Police - 02/26Think You Have The Right To Demand Police Identify Themselves? Look Closer. - 02/25

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top