informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Mar 01 2008, 7:47 AM Category: General Source: The Onion Print

Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early








Latest General
- Officer Pulls Woman Over. Instead of a Ticket, He Showed His Humanity
- Ferguson: A Libertarian Look -- Will Grigg on the Tom Woods Show
- New York Times: End Federal Marijuana Prohibition
- The Purge: Anarchy PARODY
- Peter Schiff On Gov't Push To Regulate Navigation Apps
- New Miss U.S.A. Criticized For Saying Women Should Be Prepared To Defend Themselves
- "Minnesota 'Unsession' Dumps 1,175 Obsolete, Silly Laws"
- Lawyer: Family Warned Cops Before Calif. Rampage









Comments 21 - 25 of 25 Add Comment < Page of 2
globalstomp

Posted: Mar 06 2008, 10:41 PM

Link
Chris, This is like welcome to shill-ville. I like the part at the end where she says there's a cure for awakeness. It's probably the TV she is referring to so as to lull you back to sleep. And the assassination mentioned is a nice touch. Keep up the good work and don't let the police state get you down LOL..............................
Anonymous

Posted: Mar 10 2008, 2:20 PM

Link
7163 Since I was the first poster, regarding The Onion, or "Allium cepa" as it is known in some circles, I thought I should chime in. (Neat, huh? That's the new Word-play/Latin-plant-name translator plugin, DoD issue!) By the way, aren't those letters at the bottom supposed to protect you from the MadLib bugs and Viagra ads?

In my original post, I didn't want to be verbose and waste cyber-space, but the can of worms is still open, so everybody grab a fork...

I posted the originial comment that the Diebold story was fake/comedy news because unlike other sites, there was no indication on this one as to whether or not the poster knew that it was fake news. Whether or not you trust your readership to know the difference isn't the point. Anyone who watched the clip and speaks English could probably deduce in 5 seconds that the film was a parody (eg. flames shooting out of the White House), but then wonder to themselves why you posted it along with all of the other stories of pants-shitting terror, with no clue as to whether or not YOU, the poster knew it wasn't real news. Like it or not, that DOES call into question the rest of your content, or at least whether or not you screen your content before linking it. It's categorized as "General", not "Satire/Comedy/Funny". Click on the link for "General" and see what other stories comes up. You've got like 20 "serious" stories to every 1 "comedy". Get the picture?

The other motivating factor for my posting was that this web-site, while a fine source for alternative news, occasionally prints things that are misleading, even if unintentionally so, such as running year-old stories as if they were recent events, again without indication that you, the linker/poster, knows it's a re-post. There are also links from "news" sources that at first glance don't sound like news sources to begin with, but are, and vice versa. Which sounds most like a reputable news source to you, "Boing Boing", "NewsMax", or "The Onion"? Small points, I know, but your site description/subtitle reads "The NEWS you're not supposed to know..." So, is commentary "news" too? (FOX News thinks so) The devil is in the details, folks.

Since I've got the "talking feather" here, I want to point out some other things. For claiming to be a bunch of emancipated minds here, you all sure do some odd things:
Firstly, in this series of comments, you call anyone who points out a simple, easily correctable error/oversight like this, a "Shill", as if that alone clears you of any wrong-doing. I am not a government or any other kind of "shill", a word that has shown up in this comment thread 5 times, the first 2 by the moderator! That's right, name-calling: the quickest, easiest way to identify people in an US vs THEM environment. All I did was tacitly suggest you re-label it "comedy" or "satire" or SOMETHING. How does that make me a "shill"? And if only I could get $10 every time I said "by the way, goober, you know this isn't REAL news, right?"
Second, if you're going to own up to it as a mistake, do it in an adult way. Yeah, you didn't label it, no big deal, but don't go saying "well, it's because I respect my readership THAT MUCH, and you, corporate/govt shill commenter, obviously think that we, the great emancipated minds, are a bunch of sheeple idiots," or spin it like it was some grand social experiment that my pea brain can't understand.
Third, for as much noise as there is on this entire website against the BigBrother/Nanny/RFID state, you have a good number of comments about "these guy's IP addresses" and what parts of this website I/we look at, and at what frequency. I understand the role and responsibility of a net admin, and the need to monitor IP's and traffic, but you're using that info as fodder for your argument in a public forum. I find that VERY RICH indeed. You have a problem with it until you can use it on other people, then it's OK, right? FYI, I don't spend my entire day reading every word of your web-site because many of your stories are linked or re-linked on other like-minded websites, so I've already seen them by the time I visit. InfoLib usually only posts new stuff every 3 days or so anyway, so what's your point? The "puppy throwing" video, for example, was almost a week old when you finally posted it. Also, I have a JOB and a LIFE.
Finally, when you step back and take it in, you seem vehemently against a small thing that could lend, if nothing else, MORE credibility to your site. You have stories on here that are hard to believe just by virtue of how scary they are, if indeed true. How does it help you to publish fake news, that you apparently know is fake, without letting us know that YOU know it isn't fake? If it's unclear whether YOU, the poster can tell the difference, why should anyone trust you when you say it isn't fake?

Can I go back to one-line comments now?
Chris

Posted: Mar 10 2008, 4:02 PM

Link
My comment was not directed towards your post, but I'll respond to the points you made anyways.

(Each line is a response to each paragraph)

The verification code is anti-spambot, not anti-shill.

Trust in the readership is the point, unlike most other sites on the internet we do not spell things out for people. We let them think for themselves and come to their own conclusions about what they read/watch. If you love someone let them go, I live my life by that principle and I try as much as possible to leave people to decide things for themselves. It is a fundamentally different approach to dealing with people. There is a line in a Zen text, "don't change your words to suit the person", I try to live my life by that principle, I try to be myself and not who others want me to be, even if part of me thinks being someone else would help the other person. There were reasons for posting it as is, I discussed them in previous posts.

As to the categories, that's a valid point, in the future we may make an entertainment category.

I responded to the shill thing earlier, I was just pointing out the similarities, and like I said it was not directed to you.

I explained why I didn't label it, it was not a mistake, there is nothing to "own" up to.

As to the IP tracking, It is part of our stats counter we use to see how many people are visiting the site etc. It is possible to manually look a persons IP up and see what articles they've viewed. The only times I've ever used it to track an IP is when I suspect someone of shilling, I check to see if they're actually a regular or not. I use it sparingly for moderation tasks, not spying. Again, my comments were not directed towards you.

Sorry we don't update often enough, we used to update daily. The focus of the site changed the more my brother and I learned. We've gotten more away from the daily blow by blow and try to focus a little more on topics of deep significance. Hence the focus on psychology, philosophy, and less transient commentary. As I've said before, popularity, credibility, etc. is not important to me, I used to care about those things, no longer. This site is for those who want to know.
1stcleanharry

Posted: Jul 07 2008, 7:41 PM

Link
It seems that Onion know more than what they are telling us.
It'll be too much of a coincidence if Mccain wins.
Which is clear as day that he will.
Perhaps their news on this subject was quite legitimate.
It may look like satire but maybe its their way of creating attention without creating any adverse attention.
That kind of news would never be seen on FOX or CNN even though they know that voting machine fiddles have existed for years.
Obama is losing ground, fast now, as predicted since the freindship between BUllSHit and McCain started, Mcain would be the sure winner.
And there aint no machine on earth that is going to say otherwise.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 08 2008, 3:13 PM

Link
206173 If voting changed anything, they`d make it illegal!

-Emma Goldman
Comments 21 - 25 of 25 < Page of 2


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Video: Cop Arrests Subway Performer For Singing, Despite Cop Reading Aloud Rule Saying It's Permitted - 10/20Video Shows Officer Coaxing Friendly Pets Closer With Kissing Noises Before Opening Fire - 10/20ISIS Cited as Michigan Village's Police Push for Secrecy - 10/20County Justifies Warrantless Raids Because Cannabis Plants Are An 'Immediate Danger' - 10/20Reading the Road Map to a Police State - 10/20FBI Director Demands Law to Give Cops Backdoor Access to Everyone's Private Data - 10/20New Zealand Police Raid Home Of Reporter Who Embarrassed Gov't Officials & Was Working On Snowden Documents - 10/20Chicago Cops Loot Taxpayers For Settlement After Beating Woman During Raid; Video 'May Inflame Jury' - 10/21

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top