The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Analysis posted Feb 26 2007, 3:47 PM Category: Cover-Up/Deceptions Source: Information Liberation Print

The Smoking Gun? BBC Jumps The Gun: Announces WTC7 Collapse As Building Still Stands


Google has coincidentally pulled the video, we are in the process of trying to get it back up.


The video can be downloaded through bit torrent at Conspiracy Central HERE and HERE

Video Description from Poster on Google:

On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.

This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.

9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.

What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.

Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.

So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.

No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.

From 911Blogger poster 911veritas:


Not had much sleep, whilst verifying and double / triple checking the numbers etc... I have now narrowed down the maximum margin of error to 1 minute and can confirm that the BBC first reported WTC7's collapse at 5pm (plus or minus 60secs) New York time LIVE on 9/11, a full 20 minutes before the actual collapse happened !!!

I am working on presenting this info with a V2 of above vid and 911blogger exclusive blog, which will take some time, verification is very important and to aid this.

I please ask as many people (with high speed internet) and 5GB of spare disk space to download the following BBC originals. These are what I used to confirm the timings (you can too) and have the damning footage etc.

All times are local "New York", the ranges are pretty accurate, but following my calculations are approximately 3 mins earlier than the actual time.

Each file is MPEG format and 1GB in size - To Download - "Right Click / Save Target As"

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 14:08 to 14:49

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 14:49 to 15:31

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 15:31 to 16:13

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 16:13 to 16:54

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 16:54 to 17:36

I have produced a medium res WMV file that shows time sychronized continuous footage from 14:40 to 17:18.

This file is approx 700MB and starts at the Pataki conference with an accurate timestamp of 14:40 Eastern Time (gotta find a home for it online, DZ ?).

Maybe Guy Smith can do some research for us... LOL

Best wishes and good luck

Props to Gangster for the initial heads up on the 9/11 realtime news footage archive on

Continuous realtime footage from 9/11 by ABC, CNN, BBC, NBC, FOX etc...

Good starting Link :

As stallion4 kindly mentioned....

More info in this blog :

WTC 7 Collapse Video:

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Astounding, shocking video shows reporter talking about collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones

An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.

This amazing clip is currently carried on Google Video and you can watch it above but many expect it to be removed shortly. We are attempting to download an original copy from the source.

Although there is no clock on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.

Here are some further screenshots from the video.

The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

As we have documented before, firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building's collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates.

In a September 2002 PBS documentary, the owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein discusses Building 7 and states that in the late afternoon of September 11, the decision was made to "pull it." The term "pull it" is industry jargon for controlled demolition, but Silverstein denied charges that WTC 7 had been deliberately brought down.

This newly uncovered video confirms that the collapse of WTC 7 was no surprise, because television news stations were reporting on it before it happened!

This footage is absolutely amazing and should provoke a firestorm of new questions aimed both at Silverstein and the BBC. Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did and why were they reporting its fall in advance of the event actually taking place?

Many have speculated that some kind of press release was leaked too soon and AP wires, radio stations and TV news outlets prematurely reported on WTC 7's collapse.

The video also severely undermines the credibility of the BBC who recently caused controversy by airing a 9/11 hit piece that sought to debunk questions that bring the official story into doubt.

Calls have already been put through to the BBC reporting the "mistake," click here to listen to an MP3. The BBC have promised to "look into it."

ACTION: E Mail the BBC and ask them to clarify exactly why their reporter is announcing the collapse of Building 7 before it has collapsed.

Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Did #Mizzou Protestor Jonathan Butler Lie About Being Hit by UM President's Car?
- Sports Military Worship Propaganda Exposed -- Senate Report Admits Millions Spent On PsyOp
- Corbett On New Iraq War Docs
- Fake CIA Agent For FOX News Has Spewed Horse S**t For 12 Years, and Americans Were Eating It Up
- US Forces in Afghanistan Knew Kunduz Site Was Hospital - AP Report
- The Mystery of ISIS' Toyota Army Solved
- The Gender Wage Gap -- A Myth That (Still) Just Won't Die
- State Department 'Planted' Anti-Wikileaks Questions For 60 Minutes Interview With Julian Assange

Comments 1 - 19 of 20 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 8:00 PM

16138 GET A LIFE - Confusion and Misinformation was rampant on 9/11 any premature reports on the collapse of Tower 7, could be contributed to just misidentifying buildings located at the WTC complex.

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 8:06 PM

69134 Pretty hard to believe that people sit here and question this, it is blatantly in your face from the live news broadcast.
There is nothing to deny here.

To deny this puts you in the same category as a young Earth Creationist, basically you are INSANE and suffering from severe cognitive dissonance.
9/11 was without any question an inside job, get used to it.

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 8:18 PM

"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich, "The Murder of Christ"

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 8:32 PM

20394 Reminds me of how when JFK was assassinated - the NZ papers had printed photos of Oswald, before they even arrested him in the US.

Watch the Oliver Stone movie JFK.

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 8:47 PM

63209 I'm tired of listening to the rest of you spew accusations out your assholes. None of us know the whole story, and unless we break open the White House, we never will. We're only stooping to media level with this propaganda; why can't we just search for truth ourselves?

Posted: Feb 26 2007, 9:21 PM

20486 I remember the day when that horrible event happened. I immediately thought to myself, there is no way the US would have allowed such an attack to occur especially from a foreign government. Thus, I believed it had to have been an inside job. No one believed it then and probably no one will believe anyone now. Everything that is happening now (i.e. in the middle east) cannot be justified if these attacks were indeed an inside job. For the majority of the population, it is easier for their simple minds to believe what they want to hear, which is usually the first story. Chris, you my friend, hit the nail on the head.

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 12:44 AM

71237 I wasn't there, I can't prove that WTC7 wasn't intentionally blown up, but there's ample evidence showing that it sustained severe structural damage when the twin towers fell next to it:

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 1:31 AM

6412 Yeah, but we Americans wanna know whats going on with Anna Nicole Smith. Pass the potato chips.

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 1:33 AM

216188 Everybody to reads this, PLEASE email the media outlets. Email Fox News (whether you love them or hate them), email CNN, email ABC, email PBS! I have already sent emails. Their emails are available on their websites. We all need to flood them with emails and demand coverage of this earth-shattering new information.

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 12:21 PM

21988 "9/11 was without any question an inside job, get used to it."

so hardly anyone know beforehand? just the BBC and the Bush Administration, right?

have any of you lunatics heard of timezones? if you calibrate for the fact that the time on-screen is calling out Eastern Standard Time, while the tower actually collapsed at 5:20 Eastern Daylight Time then you find that the Report (at 5:15 EST) was actually at 6:15 EDT -- 55 minutes after the actual collapse at 5:20 EDT.

seriously, I understand that by pointing out the insanely obvious Im ruining your masturbation fantasies, but you guys are embarrassing the rest of us. couldn't you engage your critical thinking facilities just occasionally?

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 2:11 PM

13782 "have any of you lunatics heard of timezones? if you calibrate for the fact that the time on-screen is calling out Eastern Standard Time, while the tower actually collapsed at 5:20 Eastern Daylight Time then you find that the Report (at 5:15 EST) was actually at 6:15 EDT -- 55 minutes after the actual collapse at 5:20 EDT"

Unbelievable how people want to cling to any faint hope they can find to convince themselves that their government did not attack themselves on 9/11. I suggest you check Wikipedia for the definition of EST and EDT. Nevertheless, if you take the time to actually watch the video, she is reporting on WTC7 as having collapsed when it is clearly visible in the NY skyline behind her. WTC7 has always been the smoking gun.

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 2:34 PM

24141 Zesty is absolutely correct - 5:15 EST = 6:15EDT (EDT = -4 GMT, while EST = -5 GMT), and I assure that on September 11th NYC was in EDT, not EST. Giving some obtuse appeal to authority (in this case dubiously Wikipedia) without clarifying WHAT you're appealing to isn't overly credible either.

I have to assume that you conspiracy theory nuts must have been in school that morning or something, and thus you have no idea how chaotic the reporting was that morning. Smoking gun indeed.

Posted: Feb 28 2007, 9:47 AM

86133 This is HUGE, this was supposed to be a RANDOM collapse.

How did the BBC know it was going to collapse 20 minutes before it actually did, unless it was pre-planned - just like a controlled demolition.


Posted: Mar 01 2007, 5:46 AM

68112 I take it daylight savings time also allows cameras to show buildings standing simultaneously with reporters describing their demise in the past tense.
Attributing this to DST is as logical as buying an Australian newspaper in the morning to see where stocks will close.

Posted: Mar 05 2007, 12:27 AM

6781 EST EDT ADD....BBC vid is just another drop in the 9/11 water bucket. People with ADD please wake up from the slumber. When did buildings start dropping straight down in there own footprint due to fires? Remember WTC 7 was NEVER HIT BY A PLANE. Let science be your guide. A course in Engineering Statics might help some of you. But in reality common sense will tell you that a fire will not cause all columns to fail at the same second but sadly common sense is not so common.
Turbo Dude

Posted: Mar 08 2007, 4:54 PM

8445 Having been an exposer of 9/11 and 7/7 Truth, I have come to realise most people fall into these categories:

1. They know what really happened and try to get the word out to those who don't.
2. They don't know what happened, but would like to.
3. Know what really happened, but would rather hide from the terrible truth.
4. Have been lied to so many times that they accept anything the mass media tells them.

People need the truth. However hard it is to accept or the same thing will continue to America and the rest of the world as the Globalists continue carving up the world. Those who expose the truth are heros that need to be heard and recognised if we are ever to wake up. Don't forget where all the 'debunkers' came from. Mass media is what is controling us at the moment, first and formost. I too thought it was all rubbish until I checked out all the evidence on offer.

Posted: Aug 11 2009, 2:09 PM

80248 ...and why do you think that the pictures of the disaster behind the BBC reporter were indeed necessarily live feed? Because of a time-stamp? So you think that this is irrefutable proof of a conspiracy? You think that within a very short time, your own democratically-elected government successfully initiated a complex controlled demolition of 2 huge burning buildings (complete with thousands of people inside), without entering the building and laying explosives? I have a splitting headache just listening to you. I'm off to do more constructive things. Don't call me.

Posted: Sep 27 2012, 8:41 AM


Posted: Jul 17 2015, 3:47 AM

72181 @ZestyZuchini

Jobu actually said exactly what you need to hear:

"I take it daylight savings time also allows cameras to show buildings standing simultaneously with reporters describing their demise in the past tense.
Attributing this to DST is as logical as buying an Australian newspaper in the morning to see where stocks will close."
Comments 1 - 19 of 20 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend' - 11/24Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects - 11/23Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free - 11/24Undercover Cop Dressed In All Black Shot While Placing GPS Tracker On Car - 11/20WeAreChange Blocked in France Because of New Censorship Law - 11/24NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct - 11/24VIDEO: Hillary Fans Voice Support For Her 'Plan to Repeal 4th Amendment' - 11/24AZ State Supreme Court Rules Cannabis In The Blood Does Not Constitute Impairment - 11/24

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up