The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Analysis posted Aug 25 2006, 9:36 PM Category: Commentary Source: ekosTV Print

The Fluoride Conspiracy

"Tell a lie loud enough and long enough and people will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler

"Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century."
- Robert Carlton, Ph.D, former EPA scientist, 1992

The history of forcing fluoride on humans through the fluoridation of drinking water is wrought with lies, greed and deception. Governments that add fluoride to drinking water supplies insist that it is safe, beneficial and necessary, however, scientific evidence shows that fluoride is not safe to ingest and areas that fluoridate their drinking water supplies have higher rates of cavities, cancer, dental fluorosis, osteoporosis and other health problems. Because of the push from the aluminum industry, pharmaceutical companies and weapons manufacturers, fluoride continues to be added to water supplies all over North America and due to recent legal actions against water companies that fluoridate drinking water supplies, precedent has been set that will make it impossible for suits to be filed against water suppliers that fluoridate. There is a growing resistance against adding toxic fluoride to our water supplies, but unfortunately, because fluoride has become "the lifeblood of the modern industrial economy"(Bryson 2004), there is too much money at stake for those who endorse water fluoridation . The lies of the benefits of water fluoridation will continue to be fed to the public, not to encourage health benefits to a large number of people, but to profit the military-industrial complex.

The story begins in 1924, when Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben (I.G. Farben), a German chemical manufacturing company, began receiving loans from American bankers, gradually leading to the creation of the huge I.G. Farben cartel. In 1928 Henry Ford and American Standard Oil Company (The Rockefellers) merged their assets with I.G. Farben, and by the early thirties, there were more than a hundred American corporations which had subsidiaries and co-operative understandings in Germany. The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding Company, American I.G. Farben, which listed on it’s board of directors: Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company, Chas. E. Mitchell, President of Rockerfeller’s National City Bank of New York, Walter Teagle, President of Standard Oil New York, Paul Warburg, Chairman of the federal reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany’s War effort, Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs, and a number of other members, three of which were tried and convicted as German war criminals for their crimes against humanity. In 1939 under the Alted agreement, the American Aluminum Company (ALCOA), then the worlds largest producer of sodium fluoride, and the Dow Chemical Company transferred its technology to Germany. Colgate, Kellogg, Dupont and many other companies eventually signed cartel agreements with I.G. Farben, creating a powerful lobby group accurately dubbed "the fluoride mafia"(Stephen 1995).

At the end of World War II, the US government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. The German chemists told Perkins of a scheme which they had devised during the war and had been adapted by the German General Staff. The German chemists explained of their attempt to control the population in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water with sodium fluoride, a tactic used in German and Russian prisoner of war camps to make the prisoners "stupid and docile"(Stephen 1995). Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries because it was found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain, making it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom and causing the individual to become more docile towards authority. Fluoride remains one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances known, and is contained in twenty-five percent of the major tranquilizers. It may not seem surprising that Hitler’s regime practiced the concept of mind control through chemical means, but the American military continued Nazi research, exploring techniques to incapacitate an enemy or medicate an entire nation. As stated in the Rockerfeller Report, a Presidential briefing on CIA activities, "the drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behavior"(Stephen 1995).

The ‘dental caries prevention myth’ associated with fluoride, originated in the United States in 1939, when a scientist named Gerald J. Cox, employed by ALCOA, the largest producer of toxic fluoride waste and at the time being threatened by fluoride damage claims, fluoridated some lab rats, concluded that fluoride reduced cavities and claimed that it should be added to the nation’s water supplies. In 1947, Oscar R. Ewing, a long time ALCOA lawyer, was appointed head of the Federal Security Agency , a position that placed him in charge of the Public Health Service(PHS). Over the next three years, eighty-seven new American cities began fluoridating their water, including the control city in a water fluoridation study in Michigan, thus eliminating the most scientifically objective test of safety and benefit before it was ever completed.

American ‘education and research’ was funded by the Aluminum Manufacturing, Fertilizer and Weapons Industry looking for an outlet for the increasingly mounting fluoride industrial waste while attaining positive profit increase. The ‘discovery’ that fluoride benefited teeth, was paid for by industry that needed to be able to defend "lawsuits from workers and communities poisoned by industrial fluoride emissions" (Bryson 1995) and turn a liability into an asset. Fluoride, a waste constituent in the manufacturing processes of explosives, fertilizers and other ‘necessities’, was expensive to dispose of properly and until a ‘use’ was found for it in America’s water supplies, the substance was only considered a toxic, hazardous waste. Through sly public re-education, fluoride, once a waste product, became the active ingredient in fluorinated pesticides, fungicides, rodenticides, anesthetics, tranquilizers, fluorinated pharmaceuticals, and a number of industrial and domestic products, fluorinated dental gels, rinses and toothpastes. Fluoride is so much a part of a multibillion-dollar industrial and pharmaceutical income, that any withdrawal of support from pro-fluoridationists is financially impossible, legally unthinkable and potentially devastating for their career and reputation.

Funded by US industrialists, in an attempt to encourage public acceptance of fluoride, Edward Bernays, known also as the father of PR, or the original spin doctor, began a campaign of deception to persuade public opinion. Barnays explained "you can get practically any idea accepted if doctors are in favour. The public is willing to accept it because a doctor is an authority to most people, regardless of how much he knows or doesn’t know"(Bryson 2004). Doctors who endorsed fluoridation didn’t know that research discrediting fluoride’s safety was either suppressed or not conducted in the first place. Fluoride became equated with scientific progress and since it was introduced to the public as a health-enhancing substance, added to the environment for the children’s sake, those opposing fluoride were dismissed as cranks, quacks and lunatics. Fluoride became impervious to criticism because of a relentless PR offensive, but also because of it’s overall toxicity. Unlike chemicals that have a signature effect, fluoride, a systemic poison, produces a range of health problems, so it’s effects are more difficult to diagnose.

Recently declassified US Military documents such as Manhattan Project, shows how Fluoride is the key chemical in atomic bomb production and millions of tonnes of it were needed for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium. Fluoride poisoning, not radiation poisoning, emerged as the leading chemical health hazard for both workers and nearby communities. A-bomb scientists were ordered to provide evidence useful for defense in litigation, so they began secretly testing fluoride on unsuspecting hospital patients and indignant, mentally retarded children.. "The August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association shows that evidence of adverse effects from fluoride was censored by the US Atomic Energy Commission for reasons of "national security" (Griffiths 1998). The only report released stated that fluoride was safe for humans in small doses.

During the Cold War, Dr. Harold C. Hodge, who had been the toxicologist for the US Army Manhattan Project, was the leading scientific promoter of water fluoridation. While Dr. Hodge was reassuring congress of the safety of water fluoridation, he was covertly conducting one of the nation’s first public water fluoridation experiments in Newburgh, New York, secretly studying biological samples from Newburgh citizens at his US laboratory at the University of Rochester. Since there are no legal constraints against the suppression of scientific data, the only published conclusion resulting from these experiments was that fluoride was safe in low doses, a profoundly helpful verdict for the US Military who feared lawsuits for fluoride injury from workers in nuclear power plants and munitions factories. Fluoride pollution was one of the biggest legal worries facing key US industrial sectors during the cold war. A secret group of corporate attorneys, known as the Fluorine Lawyers Committee, whose members included US Steel, ALCOA, Kaiser Aluminum, and Reynolds Metals, commissioned research at the Kettering Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati to "provide ammunition"(Bryson 2004) for those corporations who were fighting a wave of citizen claims for fluoride injury. The Fluorine Lawyers Committee and their medical ambassadors were in personal and frequent contact with the senior officials of the federal National Institute for Dental Research, and have been implied in the ‘burying’ of the forty year old Kettering study, which showed that fluoride poisoned the lungs and lymph nodes in laboratory animals. Private interests, sought to destroy careers and censor information by ensuring that scientific studies raising doubts about the safety of fluoride never got funded, and if they did, never got published.

During the 1990’s, research conducted by Harvard toxicologist Phillis Mullenix showed that fluoride in water may lead to lower IQ’s, and produced symptoms in rats strongly resembling attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Just days before her research was accepted for publication, Mullenix was fired as the head of toxicology at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston. Then her application for a grant to continue her fluoride and central nervous system research was turned down by the US National Institute of Health (NIH), when an NIH panel told her that "fluoride does not have central nervous system effects"(Griffiths 1998).

Despite growing evidence that it is harmful to public health, US federal and state pubic health agencies and large dental and medical organizations such as the American Dental Association (ADA), continue to promote fluoride. Water fluoridation continues, despite the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s own scientists, whose union, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, has taken a strong stand against it. Dr. William Hirzy, vice president of Chapter 280, stated that "fluoride (that is added to municipal water) is a hazardous waste product for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits"( Mullenix 1998). Although fluoride is up to fifty times more toxic than sulfur dioxide, it is still not regulated as an air pollutant by the American Clean Air Act. Since thousands of tonnes of industrial fluoride waste is poured into drinking water supplies all over North America, supposedly to encourage gleaming smiles in our children, big industry in the US has the benefit of emitting as much fluoride waste into the environment as they like with absolutely no requirement to measure emissions and no way of being held accountable for poisoning people, animals and vegetation.

In August 2003, the EPA requested that the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), re-evaluate water fluoride safety standards by reviewing recent scientific literature, because the last review in 1993 had major gaps in research. "Neither the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nor the National Institute for Dental Research (NIDR), nor the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry has any proof on fluoride’s safety or effectiveness"(Sterling 1993). The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology has classified fluoride as an unapproved dental medicament due to it’s high toxicity and the US National Cancer Institute Toxicological Program has found fluoride to be an "equivocal carcinogen" (Maurer 1990).

Currently the US government is continuing to introduce further fluoridation schemes throughout the country, including the Water Act passed in November 2003, which has made it impossible for water companies to undergo civil or criminal hearings as a result of adding fluoride to public water supplies.

In a society where products containing asbestos, lead, beryllium and many other carcinogens have been recalled from the marketplace, it is surprising that fluoride is embraced so thoroughly and blindly. It seems absurd that we would consider paying the chemical industry to dispose of their toxic waste by adding it to our water supply. Hiding the hazards of fluoride pollution from the public is a capitalist-style con job of epic proportions that has occurred because a powerful lobby wishes to manipulate public opinion in order to protect it’s own financial interests. "Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country... our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of" (Bernays 1991).

Related Video on Edward Bernays and Mass Manipulation:
The Century of the Self: The Untold History Of Controlling The Masses Through The Manipulation Of Unconscious Desires

Latest Commentary
- With Mass Shootings, The State Makes Us Less Safe
- Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'
- Fear Is The Name of The Game
- This Thanksgiving, Let's Say 'No Thanks' to The Tyranny of The American Police State
- Donald Trump's Presidential "Heel Turn"
- Katniss Vs. Power: The Lessons of Hunger Games
- Tracking ISIS to DC's Doorsteps
- The Paris Attacks Were An Intelligence Community Failure, Not An 'Encryption' Problem

Comments 21 - 40 of 168 Add Comment < Page of 9 >

Posted: Jul 02 2007, 6:55 PM

10% of UK Yes, and London water isn't flourided...yet. But it is set to grow.

My current dentist is great, really a decent person. But he is convinced of the need for flouride (as well as calcium) he calls it mineralisation of the teeth. He thinks so particularly for me at age 46, with thinning of the enamel. BUt don't use toothpaste , only sticks. Unfortunately I began smoking. I reckon this affects mineralisation of the teeth, which is after all a metabolic process.

I was involved with costly scientific research: i went to the dentist with no pain or decay, but one black mark. I came out with a filling in black. Soon the tooth next to it rotted. Apparently they for a poor 'skin' with enamel, these amalgams. Only gold is good. Elsewhere after falling in love with a large (wholesale) box of imported Turkish delight, feeling depressed with academic study, and falling asleep with my love, I developed a little black mark. I whipped myself into discipline, and hey, it actually went away,( only care with brushing with my stick).

In the UK, although we contribute to our dental care in tax, if you refuse amalgam fillings, you have to pay the whole price for gold: no rebate: the present government took the choice away. So much for the public can choose. dentists think it is wrong. I do. Someone should take them to court.
Diana Buckland MCS-G

Posted: Jul 19 2007, 10:40 PM

58170 The world's population are suffering out of control health problems - my website which has no income is trying to bring Awareness, Education, Information & Recognition to the disastrous human health & environmental health consequences as a result of global chemical pollution - the scourge of fluoridation forced into our water supplies is yet another outrage and another massive error that has been forced on us the innocent population who have even lost our rights as to what we drink, our babies are injected with dangerous chemicals by way of vaccinations, how do we get our rights back about what we consume? Even in Australia a doctors group is calling for routine circumcision of all newborn males!!! how dare they decide even this personal choice, this article was in the Courier Mail Brisbane July 7/8 2007 How will we stop this? How do we stop them forcing us to consume fluoride? How do we stop them injecting our children with many vaccines?
We must be able to choose as human beings of this world and not be treated like sheep or numbers. Thanks for listening, Di Buckland MCS-Global
Our Website Global Campaign is to bring Awareness, Information and Education to the world population of the disastrous human health and environmental health consequences as a result of global chemical pollution and to gain full and formal global recognition of MCS and other chemically induced illnesses & diseases.

Posted: Jul 30 2007, 8:43 PM

7469 Thank You!

Posted: Sep 05 2007, 3:21 AM

248 A lot of disinformation bullshit!

Posted: Sep 06 2007, 2:34 PM

7281 Anyone else notice that there are no real citations in this article? I could write an article about anything at all, fill it w/ specious citations--ie: Vitamin D supplements are actually part of a secret federally sponsored plan, in conjunction w/ Merck and other military-industrial pharmaceuticals, to limit free thought by depressing the medulla, which is one of the brain's control centers(Smith, 2007).--and there you have it folks, an authentic conspiracy! This is not to say that there are no conspiracies, but please--back this stuff up with SOMETHING, otherwise it's just craziness.
Concerned Parent

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 8:31 PM


June 28, 1974: Little William Kennerly, age 3, of New York died just four hours after receiving a standard brush-on topical stannous fluoride treatment during his first and only trip to the dentist. It wasn't explained to William that he was supposed to spit the fluoride out instead of swallowing it, and he paid with his life.

Extracts from the autopsy report, performed by a Dr. Torno on 25 May 1974 at Kings County Mortuary:

"William Kennerly
Case #K74-3511
Age: 3 years
Height: 39"
Weight: 32 lb

Clinical history - the child swallowed about 45cc of 2% stannous fluoride
solution in the pediatric dental clinic, Bristol Street Clinic, at 9:30 a.m.
He was given epiniphrine I.M. in dental clinic and sent to Brookdale
Medical Center for close observation. The child came to Brookdale Medical
Center at 12:30 noon, was well until 1:00 when suddenly went into
Cardiac respiratory arrest and was in shock. The child vomited out and
had an unrecordable blood pressure. He finally expired on May 24, 1974,
at 2:00 p.m."

A toxicologist's report later stated that little William had swallowed the equivalent of three lethal doses. His parents later collected several hundred thousand dollars in a wrongful-death lawsuit, but that was small consolation for the senseless loss of their son.

Toothpaste is similar in this regard, because a typical family-sized 7-ounce tube of toothpaste contains enough stannous fluoride or sodium fluoride to kill a 20-pound child. To test this, just call the 800 number listed on your toothpaste box, tell them that your 2-year-old child has just eaten half a tube of toothpaste and that he's now vomiting, act frantic, and watch how quickly your call gets patched directly through to a Poison Control Center. (It's common for a child to vomit for 12 hours, after eating a large quantity of toothpaste.)

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 8:38 PM

8525 Fluoride supplements have never been approved by the FDA! On 2 June 1992, New Jersey Assemblyman John V. Kelly issued a press release that he was requesting that the FDA remove children's fluoride supplements from the market. He had previously asked them to provide his office with the studies that supported the safety and effectiveness of children's fluoride supplements, and after searching through their records, the FDA reported back to him that no drug applications had ever been filed for these prescription drugs. To sum up, these fluoride supplements have been illegally prescribed for over 30 years to millions of children, and their status has never been elevated above what the FDA terms as, "unapproved new drugs."

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 8:48 PM

83209 Fluorine is the most highly-reactive and chemically unstable of ALL existing chemical elements. Fluorine is not found by itself in nature, because it is so unstable that it chemically combines--violently, in many cases--with practically any other element.

Fluorine is one of the major ingredients in the psycho-active psychiatric drug PROZAC (Fluoxetene Hydrochloride) and also in deadly SARIN military nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl Fluoride).

According to SARIN's official Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), once you remove the fluorine from SARIN, all that remains is an inert non-toxic acid. In other words, fluorine is what gives SARIN it's highly-lethal "kick."

The nerve-gas SOMAN is chemically similar to SARIN; they both contain fluorine. They are called "nerve" agents because tiny amounts of these substances directly attack and destroy the nervous system in a very efficient manner. A lethal dose of Sarin fits on the head of a pin.

--The infamous date-rape hypnotic drug "Roofs" (Rohypnol) is Valium in combination with Fluorine. This combination is reportedly 20-30 times more potent than Valium alone. Remove the fluorine, and it's no longer hypnotic.

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 8:53 PM

66219 Note the following entry in an EPA/NIOSH (Environmental Protection Agency/National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) Hazardous Waste book, on page 3066 under SODIUM FLUORIDE:

"An experimental tumorigen and teratogen [meaning it’s a common tool normally used to deliberately and predictably cause cancer tumors and monstrous abnormalities in laboratory experiments].

Human system overdose effects: Burning, prickling, tingling, itching of the skin, drooping of the eyelid, tremors, extra fluid intake, muscle weakness, headache, EKG [brainwave] changes, cyanosis [bluish skin color from inadequate oxygen], respiratory depression, hypermolitility [extremely physically active], diarrhea, nausea or vomiting, salivary gland changes, changes in teeth and supporting structures, musculo-skeletal changes, increased immune system response, and human mutatogenic data [mutates human cells].

A corrosive irritant to eyes and mucous membranes. Experimental reproductive effects. It is very phytotoxic [toxic to plant life]. Used in chemical cleaning, for fluoridation of drinking water, as a fungicide and insecticide. ... May be a carcinogen."

On page 1735 in the same book, under FLUORIDES: "Can cause or aggravate attacks of asthma and severe bone changes, making normal movements painful. Some signs of pulmonary fibrosis are noted. Some enzyme systems effects are reported.

Loss of weight, anorexia [loss of appetite], anemia, wasting and cachexia [general wasting of the body during a chronic disease], and dental defects are among the common findings in chronic fluoride poisoning. Symptoms of intoxication include gastric, intestinal, circulatory, respiratory and nervous complaints and skin rashes."

--Aren't these complaints similar to what the TV commercials say we've got to take various drugs for? Gee, who profits from this, anyway???

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:00 PM

21723 Isabel Jansen, R.N., wrote of a simple experiment regarding the use of aluminum pots, where you can easily prove for yourself that both the aluminum and the fluoride content in water both increase dramatically, when combined:

"In January 1987, experiments performed at the Medical Research Endocrinology Dept., Newcastle upon Tyne, England, and the Physics Dept of the Univ. of Ruhana, Sri Lanka, showed that fluoridated water at 1 ppm, when used in cooking in aluminum cookware, concentrated the aluminum up to 600 ppm, whereas water without fluoride did not. (Science News, 131:73) (Note: Why wasn't this simple test ever financed, done, and published in U.S. scientific papers?)

"The researchers suggested that because of the known fact that aluminum is neuro-toxic and is in abnormally high concentrations in the brain of Alzheimer's and other neurological disease victims, including AIDS, that these findings raise questions about adding fluoride to the water supply of communities to reduce tooth decay.

"Because of these findings, a test was made of Antigo, Wisconsin water which had been fluoridated for 33 years. The water was examined by a certified Wisconsin laboratory, and showed that when it was used in cooking in aluminum cookware, it concentrated the aluminum by 833 times and increased the fluoride content by 100%.

"The maximum allowed aluminum content of water is set by the World Health Organization at 200 micrograms per liter. This makes Antigo water, when cooked in aluminum, 75 times over the maximum.

Antigo water pipes are also encrusted with (calcified) fluoride from 26 to 3,100 ppm. This latter was analyzed and diagnosed by the Wisconsin Dept of Hygiene as being aluminum fluoride. Regardless of which findings are true, to chance exchanging a hole in a tooth---which can be repaired at a nominal fee---for dementia (organic brain disorder) in later years, for which there is no remedy at any price, hardly seems to be a good bargain.

"Therefore, it would seem imperative that other communities test their water in the same manner to see if it produces the same results, as tests may vary depending on the mineral variations of the water and the type of aluminum cookware. This simple test can be done by anyone, with the help of a laboratory to do the analysis."

Article by ISABEL JANSEN, R.N. (Journal of the National Academy of Research Biochemists - Jan/Feb '90)
Diabetes Patient

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:05 PM


There are reportedly more than 15 million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 15 million Americans probably shouldn't drink fluoridated water, because in doing so, they'll receive an excessive dose of fluoride, which is also accumulative in the body.

People with kidney disease also shouldn't drink fluoridated water. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which is your main route of fluoride elimination. Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney-disease patients on dialysis machines died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply.

There is no data as to what effects "standard" fluoridated water causes to kidney patients on dialysis, but the entire premise is stupidly ridiculous: Could you find any kidney patient volunteers to do a meaningful scientific double-blind crossover study on how many parts-per-million of rat poison in the city water supply it takes to be lethal for someone on dialysis?

If fluoride gets into their body in higher doses, then how much of their lifestyle, physical health, mental attitude, etc. is lowered by dialysis using city water, only because they’re hammered with a higher dose of rat poison than the general public is, and not because of their kidney disease as might be mis-diagnosed?
Student of Toxicolog

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:08 PM

9166 The name "SARIN" is an acronym of the names of the four key I.G. Farben employees involved in its initial chemical formulation and production: Schrader, Ambros, Rudriger, and Van Der Linde. Otto Ambros was the production chief of I.G. Farben's poison gas facilities in Germany. (See Ambros' photo on p. 286 of "World Without Cancer" by G. Edward Griffin.)

SARIN was developed to replace deadly Malathion and Zyklon B nerve gases, specifically with the intent to exterminate millions of prisoners. Fluoride-bearing SARIN was reportedly so strong, "it made Zyklon B look like underarm deodorant." (The Dickinson Statement, "Health Consciousness", October 1988)

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:11 PM


Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:16 PM

8441 "I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to October 9, 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939."

"While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training schools in New York and Wisconsin ... and we were trained in the revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government. "

"... We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism.

We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump a large quantity of this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water.

"We discussed in these schools, the complete art of revolution: the seizure of the main utilities, such as light, power, gas, and water, but it was felt by the leadership that if a program of fluoridating of the water could be carried out in the nation, it would go a long way toward the advancement of the revolution."

"The above statements are true."
Oliver Kenneth Goff.
(Signed & notarized 6/22/57.)

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:22 PM

88191 1952: The Delaney Committee 82nd Congress Hearings on Fluoride revealed that there was no actual scientific basis for the fluoridation of water supplies in the prevention of tooth decay. The recommendation of the Committee was for more research to be done before proceeding with this national mass medication. Their recommendation was totally ignored.

1953: In a joint speech, U.S. Surgeon-General Scheele, and Health, Education & Welfare Undersecretary Nelson Rockefeller announced hopeful plans to put more medicine than just fluoride into the U.S. water supplies:

"Dr. Scheele, in discussing mass-application methods for preventing non-infectious diseases, said a case in point was fluoridation of water supplies to reduce tooth decay. Nearly 800 cities throughout the country have adopted the technique during the past 10 years, he said. Such a community-wide attack on "far more serious diseases than dental decay" probably will be forthcoming after laboratory tests have paved the way, he predicted." (Paterson Evening News, 11/6/53)

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:27 PM

88191 Quote from Alfred Taylor, Ph.D, in a scientific letter appearing in the Oct. 2, 1965 issue of Saturday Review:

" ... My contact with fluoridation came about as a result of cancer research. In one project, various chemicals were added to the drinking water of mice susceptible to cancer in order to check the responsibility that some chemicals might delay the onset of the disease or prevent it altogether. Among the chemicals used in this research was sodium fluoride.

In the first two preliminary tests, the results obtained indicated that mice drinking fluoridated water tended to develop cancer at an earlier age as compared with control animals maintained on fluoride-free water. These earlier tests were followed by further investigations so that altogether, twelve experiments involving 645 mice were used in this research.

The data indicated that drinking water with as little as 1 PPM shortened the life span of mice an average of nine per cent. This was true whether death was due to cancer or non-cancerous diseases. The only notice proponents of fluoridation gave to this work was to discredit it as much as possible. ...

In experiments where the drug was added directly to suspensions of cancer tissue before inoculation into eggs or mice, sodium fluoride stimulated the growth of cancer tissue in concentrations of one part in more than 20 million.

Scientists at Cambridge University (British Medical Journal, Oct 26, 1963) discovered that concentrations of sodium fluoride as low as one part in ten million inhibited the growth of a culture of human tissue. ... the growing weight of scientific evidence that water-borne fluorides, even at 1 ppm, have toxic possibilities must finally be recognized."

Clayton Foundation, Biochemical Institute, University of Texas, Austin Texas, 1965.

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 9:35 PM

61198 Vested interests who sell fluoride and pharmaceuticals, or who repair the damage, would have you believe that God screwed up so badly in engineering man's teeth that ALL of mankind is now born with a permanent deficiency of fluoride, and thus mass medication--with a nerve agent--is the most cost effective way to correct God's stupid deficiency.

However, the facts state differently. Regarding the cause of dental cavities, refined sugar and soda pop are two of the top contenders, whereas the false claim that there's a sweeping lifelong deficiency of rat poison and nerve agents in our bodies is one of the biggest, most blatant lies in all history.

Each year it's common to find a school district science fair, whereby a smart kid makes an experimental study of soaking various items (pennies, extracted teeth, etc.) in soda pop to see how long it takes to dissolve them. In one such experiment it took only 14 days for Pepsi Cola to dissolve the entire outer layer of enamel from a human tooth.

For the benefit of the fluoridation claims of U.S. Public Health Service, the ADA, the AMA, and the sugar and soda pop industries, try this uncomplicated scientific experiment: Obtain a couple of extracted teeth, give one of them a standard brushed-on topical stannous fluoride treatment which supposedly proofs it against cavities, and then soak both teeth in Coca-Cola--with a few teaspoons of sugar added--for a couple of weeks, daily changing the liquid and scrubbing the one tooth with fluoridated toothpaste. Then at the end of 2 weeks, examine both teeth. This should conclusively prove who is more stupid, God or the broad general public.

Poisonous fluoride is highly profitable. That's the only valid bottom line.

Since fluoridation was originally promoted as effective just for children under 14 years old, then in the early 1950's the public health officials had a PR problem. How could they justify mass-medicating adults with poisonous fluoride? One of the latest public health schemes along this line actually states that fluoride in saliva kills tooth plaque, emphasizing that the only way to get fluorine in your saliva is via drinking fluoridated water! Nothing is said of the toxic, life-shortening effects caused by having that much fluorine flowing through your body, however. It not only kills plaque, but everything else in its path.

The above application regards fluorine as an antiseptic, somewhat like soap. "Hands dirty? Drink some soap to wash them off."

Is the purpose just to give you the brightest smile in the morgue?

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 11:03 PM


NOTE: The following story regarding Sweden and Holland could not be found in official medical, dental or other scientific literature, almost as if it had been carefully purged from the records.

13 June 1970 the Gothenburg POST (Sweden), 5 Aug 1970 the NEWS REGISTER (Sweden), and 1 May 1970 NORSK FOLKEHELSELAG (Norway) TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH:

In 1969 the country of Sweden intended to fluoridate their water supply due to the strong advice of Professor Yngve Ericsson, a Swedish dentist who was also the senior representative on the World Health Organization's Expert Committee on Fluoridation. However, it was then found that Professor Ericsson coincidentally was the holder of two highly-profitable patents on fluoride toothpaste!

A subsequent investigation disclosed that the World Health Organization's numerous so-called "objective" comparative studies on mortality and morbidity for fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated areas simply didn't exist. The investigation stated that the World Health Organization's report was unacceptable from a scientific point of view, and that some of the claims set forth in the WHO report actually lack any and every basis in fact. The conclusion was that the details given by WHO on risks and safety margins were grossly defective. Sweden thus remains non-fluoridated, to this day.


In the mid 1970's the Netherlands fluoridated the city of Amsterdam, after which an investigation disclosed that between 100,000 and 200,000 people had developed "more or less severe side effects" to fluoride. A subsequent campaign by concerned physicians and public resulted in fluoride's complete removal from the Netherland's water supply, and the national law was also changed in such a way to permanently ban future fluoridation for the Netherlands.

Posted: Sep 22 2007, 11:06 PM

82165 THE LIE: A letter dated 1 August 1979, from the Secretary of the Victorian Branch of the Australian Dental Association stated, "In a community with a fluoridated water supply, the dental manpower required to maintain a good standard of dental health in a community is always halved."

In other words, a fluoridated community's dental health is so good, that it supposedly needs just HALF of the dentists that an unfluoridated community needs.

THE TRUTH: The 1976 edition of the C.B.S. News Almanac published figures showing the number of dentists per 100,000 population in 30 "Representative American Cities." Of these 30 cities, 16 were artificially fluoridated.

A simple comparison of the fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated cities shows that there were an average of 76.7 dentists per 100,000 population in the fluoridated cities, vs. 59.2 dentists per 100,000 in the non-fluoridated cities.

Furthermore, data from the 1971 American Dental Directory, the 1971 U.S. Statistical Abstracts and the 1973 World Almanac reveals that the three American cities which have been fluoridated the longest (Grand Rapids, Newburgh, and Evanston) averaged 121 dentists per 100,000 population, or over twice the national average, after approximately 25 years on fluoridated water. (Data compiled by Phillip R.N. Sutton, D.D.Sc., Melbourne, Australia, 1979.)


Posted: Sep 22 2007, 11:10 PM


24 August, 1982: The Japan Times published an article expressing concern about potential hazards of topical fluoride applications (9000 ppm) to teeth, and fluoride mouth rinses (250-500 ppm) has prompted researchers at the Nippon Dental College in Tokyo to investigate effects of fluoride on hamster fetal cell cultures, with results that can only be described as very disturbing.

At the August '82 meeting of the Japanese Society for Cancer Research, Associate Professor of Pharmacology Taketi Tsutsui and his colleague, Dr. Maizumi, reported that 24-hour contact with sodium fluoride solutions at concentrations of 34, 45, and 57 ppm (fluorine ion), results in morphological changes and malignant transformations in second-generation hamster fetal cells.

After the one-day fluoride treatment, one group of cells was cultured for one week and then fixed and stained for study. Survival rates of 90, 50 and 30% were found for the exposure to 34, 45, and 57 ppm respectively, with morphological changes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0% in the surviving colonies. In the untreated control cultures, the incidence of abnormalities was significantly lower -- only 0.03% or less.

In another series of experiments, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm fluoride treatments were found to have acquired the ability to proliferate in soft agar for an additional 50 to 200 days. These cells were then shown to have developed a strong tumor-forming capacity. In the untreated control cultures, neither proliferated in soft agar nor acquisition of tumor-forming capacity were observed, and only one of four cultures had transformed into one having infinite proliferative characteristics.

Between 100 and 200 days after the sodium fluoride treatment, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm treated cultures were transplanted subdermally into each of two 10-hamster groups. The animals were then observed for the appearance of tumors.

All surviving three hamsters in the group that received cells from the 34-ppm treated culture developed cancer (fibro-carcinoma) at the site of injection. Likewise, all eight surviving hamsters receiving the 45-ppm treated cells developed cancer. The other hamsters in both groups died from causes other than cancer, before the experiments were completed. None of the hamsters in the control group that received the untreated cells, developed cancer.
Comments 21 - 40 of 168 < Page of 9 >

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend' - 11/24Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects - 11/23Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free - 11/24Undercover Cop Dressed In All Black Shot While Placing GPS Tracker On Car - 11/20NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct - 11/24WeAreChange Blocked in France Because of New Censorship Law - 11/24VIDEO: Hillary Fans Voice Support For Her 'Plan to Repeal 4th Amendment' - 11/24AZ State Supreme Court Rules Cannabis In The Blood Does Not Constitute Impairment - 11/24

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up