informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Analysis posted Aug 25 2006, 9:36 PM Category: Commentary Source: ekosTV Print

The Fluoride Conspiracy


"Tell a lie loud enough and long enough and people will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler

"Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century."
- Robert Carlton, Ph.D, former EPA scientist, 1992

The history of forcing fluoride on humans through the fluoridation of drinking water is wrought with lies, greed and deception. Governments that add fluoride to drinking water supplies insist that it is safe, beneficial and necessary, however, scientific evidence shows that fluoride is not safe to ingest and areas that fluoridate their drinking water supplies have higher rates of cavities, cancer, dental fluorosis, osteoporosis and other health problems. Because of the push from the aluminum industry, pharmaceutical companies and weapons manufacturers, fluoride continues to be added to water supplies all over North America and due to recent legal actions against water companies that fluoridate drinking water supplies, precedent has been set that will make it impossible for suits to be filed against water suppliers that fluoridate. There is a growing resistance against adding toxic fluoride to our water supplies, but unfortunately, because fluoride has become "the lifeblood of the modern industrial economy"(Bryson 2004), there is too much money at stake for those who endorse water fluoridation . The lies of the benefits of water fluoridation will continue to be fed to the public, not to encourage health benefits to a large number of people, but to profit the military-industrial complex.

The story begins in 1924, when Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben (I.G. Farben), a German chemical manufacturing company, began receiving loans from American bankers, gradually leading to the creation of the huge I.G. Farben cartel. In 1928 Henry Ford and American Standard Oil Company (The Rockefellers) merged their assets with I.G. Farben, and by the early thirties, there were more than a hundred American corporations which had subsidiaries and co-operative understandings in Germany. The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding Company, American I.G. Farben, which listed on it’s board of directors: Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company, Chas. E. Mitchell, President of Rockerfeller’s National City Bank of New York, Walter Teagle, President of Standard Oil New York, Paul Warburg, Chairman of the federal reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany’s War effort, Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs, and a number of other members, three of which were tried and convicted as German war criminals for their crimes against humanity. In 1939 under the Alted agreement, the American Aluminum Company (ALCOA), then the worlds largest producer of sodium fluoride, and the Dow Chemical Company transferred its technology to Germany. Colgate, Kellogg, Dupont and many other companies eventually signed cartel agreements with I.G. Farben, creating a powerful lobby group accurately dubbed "the fluoride mafia"(Stephen 1995).

At the end of World War II, the US government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. The German chemists told Perkins of a scheme which they had devised during the war and had been adapted by the German General Staff. The German chemists explained of their attempt to control the population in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water with sodium fluoride, a tactic used in German and Russian prisoner of war camps to make the prisoners "stupid and docile"(Stephen 1995). Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries because it was found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain, making it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom and causing the individual to become more docile towards authority. Fluoride remains one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances known, and is contained in twenty-five percent of the major tranquilizers. It may not seem surprising that Hitler’s regime practiced the concept of mind control through chemical means, but the American military continued Nazi research, exploring techniques to incapacitate an enemy or medicate an entire nation. As stated in the Rockerfeller Report, a Presidential briefing on CIA activities, "the drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behavior"(Stephen 1995).

The ‘dental caries prevention myth’ associated with fluoride, originated in the United States in 1939, when a scientist named Gerald J. Cox, employed by ALCOA, the largest producer of toxic fluoride waste and at the time being threatened by fluoride damage claims, fluoridated some lab rats, concluded that fluoride reduced cavities and claimed that it should be added to the nation’s water supplies. In 1947, Oscar R. Ewing, a long time ALCOA lawyer, was appointed head of the Federal Security Agency , a position that placed him in charge of the Public Health Service(PHS). Over the next three years, eighty-seven new American cities began fluoridating their water, including the control city in a water fluoridation study in Michigan, thus eliminating the most scientifically objective test of safety and benefit before it was ever completed.

American ‘education and research’ was funded by the Aluminum Manufacturing, Fertilizer and Weapons Industry looking for an outlet for the increasingly mounting fluoride industrial waste while attaining positive profit increase. The ‘discovery’ that fluoride benefited teeth, was paid for by industry that needed to be able to defend "lawsuits from workers and communities poisoned by industrial fluoride emissions" (Bryson 1995) and turn a liability into an asset. Fluoride, a waste constituent in the manufacturing processes of explosives, fertilizers and other ‘necessities’, was expensive to dispose of properly and until a ‘use’ was found for it in America’s water supplies, the substance was only considered a toxic, hazardous waste. Through sly public re-education, fluoride, once a waste product, became the active ingredient in fluorinated pesticides, fungicides, rodenticides, anesthetics, tranquilizers, fluorinated pharmaceuticals, and a number of industrial and domestic products, fluorinated dental gels, rinses and toothpastes. Fluoride is so much a part of a multibillion-dollar industrial and pharmaceutical income, that any withdrawal of support from pro-fluoridationists is financially impossible, legally unthinkable and potentially devastating for their career and reputation.

Funded by US industrialists, in an attempt to encourage public acceptance of fluoride, Edward Bernays, known also as the father of PR, or the original spin doctor, began a campaign of deception to persuade public opinion. Barnays explained "you can get practically any idea accepted if doctors are in favour. The public is willing to accept it because a doctor is an authority to most people, regardless of how much he knows or doesn’t know"(Bryson 2004). Doctors who endorsed fluoridation didn’t know that research discrediting fluoride’s safety was either suppressed or not conducted in the first place. Fluoride became equated with scientific progress and since it was introduced to the public as a health-enhancing substance, added to the environment for the children’s sake, those opposing fluoride were dismissed as cranks, quacks and lunatics. Fluoride became impervious to criticism because of a relentless PR offensive, but also because of it’s overall toxicity. Unlike chemicals that have a signature effect, fluoride, a systemic poison, produces a range of health problems, so it’s effects are more difficult to diagnose.

Recently declassified US Military documents such as Manhattan Project, shows how Fluoride is the key chemical in atomic bomb production and millions of tonnes of it were needed for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium. Fluoride poisoning, not radiation poisoning, emerged as the leading chemical health hazard for both workers and nearby communities. A-bomb scientists were ordered to provide evidence useful for defense in litigation, so they began secretly testing fluoride on unsuspecting hospital patients and indignant, mentally retarded children.. "The August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association shows that evidence of adverse effects from fluoride was censored by the US Atomic Energy Commission for reasons of "national security" (Griffiths 1998). The only report released stated that fluoride was safe for humans in small doses.

During the Cold War, Dr. Harold C. Hodge, who had been the toxicologist for the US Army Manhattan Project, was the leading scientific promoter of water fluoridation. While Dr. Hodge was reassuring congress of the safety of water fluoridation, he was covertly conducting one of the nation’s first public water fluoridation experiments in Newburgh, New York, secretly studying biological samples from Newburgh citizens at his US laboratory at the University of Rochester. Since there are no legal constraints against the suppression of scientific data, the only published conclusion resulting from these experiments was that fluoride was safe in low doses, a profoundly helpful verdict for the US Military who feared lawsuits for fluoride injury from workers in nuclear power plants and munitions factories. Fluoride pollution was one of the biggest legal worries facing key US industrial sectors during the cold war. A secret group of corporate attorneys, known as the Fluorine Lawyers Committee, whose members included US Steel, ALCOA, Kaiser Aluminum, and Reynolds Metals, commissioned research at the Kettering Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati to "provide ammunition"(Bryson 2004) for those corporations who were fighting a wave of citizen claims for fluoride injury. The Fluorine Lawyers Committee and their medical ambassadors were in personal and frequent contact with the senior officials of the federal National Institute for Dental Research, and have been implied in the ‘burying’ of the forty year old Kettering study, which showed that fluoride poisoned the lungs and lymph nodes in laboratory animals. Private interests, sought to destroy careers and censor information by ensuring that scientific studies raising doubts about the safety of fluoride never got funded, and if they did, never got published.

During the 1990’s, research conducted by Harvard toxicologist Phillis Mullenix showed that fluoride in water may lead to lower IQ’s, and produced symptoms in rats strongly resembling attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Just days before her research was accepted for publication, Mullenix was fired as the head of toxicology at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston. Then her application for a grant to continue her fluoride and central nervous system research was turned down by the US National Institute of Health (NIH), when an NIH panel told her that "fluoride does not have central nervous system effects"(Griffiths 1998).

Despite growing evidence that it is harmful to public health, US federal and state pubic health agencies and large dental and medical organizations such as the American Dental Association (ADA), continue to promote fluoride. Water fluoridation continues, despite the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s own scientists, whose union, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, has taken a strong stand against it. Dr. William Hirzy, vice president of Chapter 280, stated that "fluoride (that is added to municipal water) is a hazardous waste product for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits"( Mullenix 1998). Although fluoride is up to fifty times more toxic than sulfur dioxide, it is still not regulated as an air pollutant by the American Clean Air Act. Since thousands of tonnes of industrial fluoride waste is poured into drinking water supplies all over North America, supposedly to encourage gleaming smiles in our children, big industry in the US has the benefit of emitting as much fluoride waste into the environment as they like with absolutely no requirement to measure emissions and no way of being held accountable for poisoning people, animals and vegetation.

In August 2003, the EPA requested that the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), re-evaluate water fluoride safety standards by reviewing recent scientific literature, because the last review in 1993 had major gaps in research. "Neither the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nor the National Institute for Dental Research (NIDR), nor the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry has any proof on fluoride’s safety or effectiveness"(Sterling 1993). The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology has classified fluoride as an unapproved dental medicament due to it’s high toxicity and the US National Cancer Institute Toxicological Program has found fluoride to be an "equivocal carcinogen" (Maurer 1990).

Currently the US government is continuing to introduce further fluoridation schemes throughout the country, including the Water Act passed in November 2003, which has made it impossible for water companies to undergo civil or criminal hearings as a result of adding fluoride to public water supplies.

In a society where products containing asbestos, lead, beryllium and many other carcinogens have been recalled from the marketplace, it is surprising that fluoride is embraced so thoroughly and blindly. It seems absurd that we would consider paying the chemical industry to dispose of their toxic waste by adding it to our water supply. Hiding the hazards of fluoride pollution from the public is a capitalist-style con job of epic proportions that has occurred because a powerful lobby wishes to manipulate public opinion in order to protect it’s own financial interests. "Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country... our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of" (Bernays 1991).

Related Video on Edward Bernays and Mass Manipulation:
The Century of the Self: The Untold History Of Controlling The Masses Through The Manipulation Of Unconscious Desires





Latest Commentary
- Tax Day: What Kind of "Civilization" Are We Paying For?
- Justice Should be Blind, Not Crazy
- US Supreme Court Endorses Involuntary Servitude
- The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return
- Gun-Control Madness
- America's Liar in Chief
- Pardon Martha Stewart and Joseph Nacchio
- Obama's Iraqi Fairy Tale









Comments 141 - 155 of 155 Add Comment < Page of 8
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 27 2012, 8:07 PM

Link
17375 in response to jesrollin@msn.com.Perhaps your dental health is due to MANY variables?ADD here it comes,& dont forget thyroxin baby!!
jes keep on rollin-down a steep incline
Alistair Milner

Posted: Dec 31 2012, 8:33 AM

Link
87113 I have bee aware of the flouride problem for years but just tended to overlook it and think we are lucky to have 'clean- ish ' water. However I regard myself as a fairly motivated person and yet regularly feel de motivated (docile) . It is only when I travel to Europe that a huge cloud over my head dissappears and I start to feel completely and utterly re energised and rejuvenated. Whilst it sounds totally un scientific I can only put it down to either the water supply or the lack of monarchy. I will definately be fitting a high quality water filter from now on. P.s in my own research i see the influence of satan in our language, words containing GE, gestapo, genocide, hunger, carnage, gerontocracy, danger etc
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 08 2013, 3:29 PM

Link
6865 Where would we be without it?
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 14 2013, 7:27 AM

Link
19480 I think it's telling that David Cameron called for increased and general fluoridation of water in the UK in the wake of the 2011 Riots that took place.
So on the one hand we prevent riots by giving the rioters better dental health...
On the other hand we prevent the riots by dosing the public with a chemical that makes the subject docile and more willing accept authority. With the added financial benefit that the pharmaceutical companies can make a ton of money from selling pills and "treatments" for some of the conditions directly attributable to the fact that fluoride is in the water... While also supplying massive payments to the self same government officials so that they "legalise" the poisoning of the water!

I think we all know which the government is likely to choose don't you?
Message to jesrolllin@msn.com

Posted: Jan 15 2013, 2:01 AM

Link
20991 Flouride advocates, They have you now! One less to fight back with every treatment! Your penial gland is calcified with heavy metal, your sold on the product! Mission accomplished! Dosile sheeple, I pray for you now.....
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 28 2013, 1:56 PM

Link
18457 Where can I find the sources you sited in this article?
Andrew

Posted: Feb 03 2013, 3:34 AM

Link
8122 Thanks for the article!
Zane

Posted: Mar 27 2013, 5:51 AM

Link
4660 Absolute bullshit mate. you guys have no fucking clue what you're chatting about. my dad's fanny hole is less empty than your heads
zammbi

Posted: Jun 08 2013, 9:58 AM

Link
11169 In case people want to read some peer reviewed scientific papers:


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18584000
"Fluoridation of drinking water remains the most effective and socially equitable means of achieving community-wide exposure to the caries prevention effects of fluoride. It is recommended that water be fluoridated in the target range of 0.6-1.1 mg/l, depending on the climate, to balance reduction of dental caries and occurrence of dental fluorosis"

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925001/
"Children from every age group had greater caries prevalence and more caries experience in areas with negligible fluoride concentrations in the water (<0.3 parts per million [ppm]) than in optimally fluoridated areas (≥0.7 ppm)."

http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2009;volume=20;issue=3;spage=350;epage=355;aulast=Dhar
"It is very clear that fluoride in recommended concentrations is definitely beneficial to health. So as to capitalize on the beneficial effects of fluoride, judicious use of fluoride supplements is mandatory."

http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/ansinet/jas/2011/3315-3321.pdf
"... it is found that the level of fluoride is far below the upper level recommended by WHO and by Bureau of Iraqi Standards. To prevent dental caries, it is recommended that drinking water in iraq should be fluorideated."

http://www.ijird.com/index.php/ijird/article/view/727/619
"1 ppm ... Dental caries reduction"

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772843?dopt=Abstract
"Water fluoridation, where technically feasible and culturally acceptable, remains a relevant and valid choice as a population measure for the prevention of dental caries."

http://www.nature.com/bdj/journal/v192/n9/full/4801410a.html
"The review concluded that no associations between cancer and water fluoridation were able to be detected."
"The outcomes examined included Down's Syndrome, mortality, senile dementia, goitre and IQ levels. Overall, the included studies examining other possible negative effects provided insufficient evidence on any particular outcome to permit confident conclusions."
"The best available evidence suggests that fluoridation of drinking water supplies reduces caries prevalence, both as measured by the proportion of children who are caries free and by the mean dmft/DMFT score"

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572013000100013&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
"The majority of samples from cities performing fluoridation had fluoride levels within the range that provides the best combination of risks and benefits, minimizing the risk of dental fluorosis while preventing dental caries"

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572013000100092&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en#B01
"The benefit of the fluoridation of public water is proportionally larger in the segments of society that do not have access to other fluoride sources such as fluoride dentifrices and which, therefore, need it the most"

http://www.bmj.com/content/321/7265/855
"The evidence of a reduction in caries should be considered together with the increased prevalence of dental fluorosis. No clear evidence of other potential negative effects was found"
"In the fluoridated areas there was a significant increase in the proportion of children without caries in 19 of 30 analyses"

http://www.cdc.gov/FLUORIDATION/pdf/pollick.pdf
"Scientific evidence supports the fluoridation of public water supplies as safe for the environment and benefi­cial to people."

http://cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-67/issue-10/578.html
"Ethically, it cannot be argued that past benefits, by themselves, justify continuing the practice of fluoridation"

http://cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-66/issue-11/592.html
"For Canadians, improving oral health by reducing dental caries is a good. Economic benefit to both society and to individuals is a good. The protection of vulnerable populations is a valued good. It is on the basis of this good that we would argue that CDA should continue to support water fluoridation."

http://www.nature.com/ebd/journal/v8/n3/pdf/6400506a.pdf
"These findings suggest that fluoride is effective in preventing caries in adults of all ages."
666

Posted: Jul 02 2013, 11:28 AM

Link
10899 someone that works at the water department in America told me they put fluoride in the water and it says on back of the bag (warning do not inhale or breathe.) our government would never hurt or harm or lie to anyone. you really believe that don't you? NWO, rfid, Ndaa, FEMA camps, martial law, building 7, the money exchangers, mark of the beast 666, and so much more they are breaking the Constitution right now for our own good. remember do not give tap water to an infant or use toothpaste on a toddler it can kill them. and that person is right if regular toothpaste is swallowed you must call a poison control center right away. why is that our government would never hurt or harm us in any way shape form or fashion they're all just Christians doing there job.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 15 2013, 12:38 PM

Link
9911 Obviously this is the work of Satan and his minions.
Who else would treat humans without love.
Anonymous

Posted: Aug 28 2013, 6:02 PM

Link
65248 Crazy!
Justice4Germans

Posted: Aug 30 2013, 12:55 PM

Link
72188 There is absolutely no truth whatsoever that the Nazis used flouride in the labor camps, the truth in actuality it was the jewish bolsheviks who used flouride nit the other way around.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 29 2013, 7:20 PM

Link
63152 dont drink fluoride its toxic dah






-Anon~
Anonymous

Posted: Feb 07 2014, 8:07 AM

Link
41204 is there a French translation / equivalent of this article?
Comments 141 - 155 of 155 < Page of 8


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Illinois Cops Caught Red-Handed Lying Under Oath In Marijuana Case - 04/16Cop Swerves His SUV Into Longboarders To Enforce $35 Bylaw Violation - 04/14Report: FBI Visiting Gun Shops to Investigate "People Talking About Big Government" - 04/16NH Cop Faces Trial After Viral Video Showed Cops Slammed Man's Head Into Wall, Maced Him & Laughed About It - 04/15Cop Pleasured Self After Forcing Woman To Strip With Threatens Of Prison, Got Secretly Taped, Sentenced To Six Years In Prison - 04/15Report: Desert Tortoise Greatly Benefits from Bundy's Cattle Grazing - 04/16This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories - 04/16Tax Day: What Kind of "Civilization" Are We Paying For? - 04/14

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top