informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Analysis posted Aug 25 2006, 9:36 PM Category: Commentary Source: ekosTV Print

The Fluoride Conspiracy


"Tell a lie loud enough and long enough and people will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler

"Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century."
- Robert Carlton, Ph.D, former EPA scientist, 1992

The history of forcing fluoride on humans through the fluoridation of drinking water is wrought with lies, greed and deception. Governments that add fluoride to drinking water supplies insist that it is safe, beneficial and necessary, however, scientific evidence shows that fluoride is not safe to ingest and areas that fluoridate their drinking water supplies have higher rates of cavities, cancer, dental fluorosis, osteoporosis and other health problems. Because of the push from the aluminum industry, pharmaceutical companies and weapons manufacturers, fluoride continues to be added to water supplies all over North America and due to recent legal actions against water companies that fluoridate drinking water supplies, precedent has been set that will make it impossible for suits to be filed against water suppliers that fluoridate. There is a growing resistance against adding toxic fluoride to our water supplies, but unfortunately, because fluoride has become "the lifeblood of the modern industrial economy"(Bryson 2004), there is too much money at stake for those who endorse water fluoridation . The lies of the benefits of water fluoridation will continue to be fed to the public, not to encourage health benefits to a large number of people, but to profit the military-industrial complex.

The story begins in 1924, when Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben (I.G. Farben), a German chemical manufacturing company, began receiving loans from American bankers, gradually leading to the creation of the huge I.G. Farben cartel. In 1928 Henry Ford and American Standard Oil Company (The Rockefellers) merged their assets with I.G. Farben, and by the early thirties, there were more than a hundred American corporations which had subsidiaries and co-operative understandings in Germany. The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding Company, American I.G. Farben, which listed on it’s board of directors: Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company, Chas. E. Mitchell, President of Rockerfeller’s National City Bank of New York, Walter Teagle, President of Standard Oil New York, Paul Warburg, Chairman of the federal reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany’s War effort, Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs, and a number of other members, three of which were tried and convicted as German war criminals for their crimes against humanity. In 1939 under the Alted agreement, the American Aluminum Company (ALCOA), then the worlds largest producer of sodium fluoride, and the Dow Chemical Company transferred its technology to Germany. Colgate, Kellogg, Dupont and many other companies eventually signed cartel agreements with I.G. Farben, creating a powerful lobby group accurately dubbed "the fluoride mafia"(Stephen 1995).

At the end of World War II, the US government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. The German chemists told Perkins of a scheme which they had devised during the war and had been adapted by the German General Staff. The German chemists explained of their attempt to control the population in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water with sodium fluoride, a tactic used in German and Russian prisoner of war camps to make the prisoners "stupid and docile"(Stephen 1995). Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries because it was found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain, making it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom and causing the individual to become more docile towards authority. Fluoride remains one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances known, and is contained in twenty-five percent of the major tranquilizers. It may not seem surprising that Hitler’s regime practiced the concept of mind control through chemical means, but the American military continued Nazi research, exploring techniques to incapacitate an enemy or medicate an entire nation. As stated in the Rockerfeller Report, a Presidential briefing on CIA activities, "the drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behavior"(Stephen 1995).

The ‘dental caries prevention myth’ associated with fluoride, originated in the United States in 1939, when a scientist named Gerald J. Cox, employed by ALCOA, the largest producer of toxic fluoride waste and at the time being threatened by fluoride damage claims, fluoridated some lab rats, concluded that fluoride reduced cavities and claimed that it should be added to the nation’s water supplies. In 1947, Oscar R. Ewing, a long time ALCOA lawyer, was appointed head of the Federal Security Agency , a position that placed him in charge of the Public Health Service(PHS). Over the next three years, eighty-seven new American cities began fluoridating their water, including the control city in a water fluoridation study in Michigan, thus eliminating the most scientifically objective test of safety and benefit before it was ever completed.

American ‘education and research’ was funded by the Aluminum Manufacturing, Fertilizer and Weapons Industry looking for an outlet for the increasingly mounting fluoride industrial waste while attaining positive profit increase. The ‘discovery’ that fluoride benefited teeth, was paid for by industry that needed to be able to defend "lawsuits from workers and communities poisoned by industrial fluoride emissions" (Bryson 1995) and turn a liability into an asset. Fluoride, a waste constituent in the manufacturing processes of explosives, fertilizers and other ‘necessities’, was expensive to dispose of properly and until a ‘use’ was found for it in America’s water supplies, the substance was only considered a toxic, hazardous waste. Through sly public re-education, fluoride, once a waste product, became the active ingredient in fluorinated pesticides, fungicides, rodenticides, anesthetics, tranquilizers, fluorinated pharmaceuticals, and a number of industrial and domestic products, fluorinated dental gels, rinses and toothpastes. Fluoride is so much a part of a multibillion-dollar industrial and pharmaceutical income, that any withdrawal of support from pro-fluoridationists is financially impossible, legally unthinkable and potentially devastating for their career and reputation.

Funded by US industrialists, in an attempt to encourage public acceptance of fluoride, Edward Bernays, known also as the father of PR, or the original spin doctor, began a campaign of deception to persuade public opinion. Barnays explained "you can get practically any idea accepted if doctors are in favour. The public is willing to accept it because a doctor is an authority to most people, regardless of how much he knows or doesn’t know"(Bryson 2004). Doctors who endorsed fluoridation didn’t know that research discrediting fluoride’s safety was either suppressed or not conducted in the first place. Fluoride became equated with scientific progress and since it was introduced to the public as a health-enhancing substance, added to the environment for the children’s sake, those opposing fluoride were dismissed as cranks, quacks and lunatics. Fluoride became impervious to criticism because of a relentless PR offensive, but also because of it’s overall toxicity. Unlike chemicals that have a signature effect, fluoride, a systemic poison, produces a range of health problems, so it’s effects are more difficult to diagnose.

Recently declassified US Military documents such as Manhattan Project, shows how Fluoride is the key chemical in atomic bomb production and millions of tonnes of it were needed for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium. Fluoride poisoning, not radiation poisoning, emerged as the leading chemical health hazard for both workers and nearby communities. A-bomb scientists were ordered to provide evidence useful for defense in litigation, so they began secretly testing fluoride on unsuspecting hospital patients and indignant, mentally retarded children.. "The August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association shows that evidence of adverse effects from fluoride was censored by the US Atomic Energy Commission for reasons of "national security" (Griffiths 1998). The only report released stated that fluoride was safe for humans in small doses.

During the Cold War, Dr. Harold C. Hodge, who had been the toxicologist for the US Army Manhattan Project, was the leading scientific promoter of water fluoridation. While Dr. Hodge was reassuring congress of the safety of water fluoridation, he was covertly conducting one of the nation’s first public water fluoridation experiments in Newburgh, New York, secretly studying biological samples from Newburgh citizens at his US laboratory at the University of Rochester. Since there are no legal constraints against the suppression of scientific data, the only published conclusion resulting from these experiments was that fluoride was safe in low doses, a profoundly helpful verdict for the US Military who feared lawsuits for fluoride injury from workers in nuclear power plants and munitions factories. Fluoride pollution was one of the biggest legal worries facing key US industrial sectors during the cold war. A secret group of corporate attorneys, known as the Fluorine Lawyers Committee, whose members included US Steel, ALCOA, Kaiser Aluminum, and Reynolds Metals, commissioned research at the Kettering Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati to "provide ammunition"(Bryson 2004) for those corporations who were fighting a wave of citizen claims for fluoride injury. The Fluorine Lawyers Committee and their medical ambassadors were in personal and frequent contact with the senior officials of the federal National Institute for Dental Research, and have been implied in the ‘burying’ of the forty year old Kettering study, which showed that fluoride poisoned the lungs and lymph nodes in laboratory animals. Private interests, sought to destroy careers and censor information by ensuring that scientific studies raising doubts about the safety of fluoride never got funded, and if they did, never got published.

During the 1990’s, research conducted by Harvard toxicologist Phillis Mullenix showed that fluoride in water may lead to lower IQ’s, and produced symptoms in rats strongly resembling attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Just days before her research was accepted for publication, Mullenix was fired as the head of toxicology at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston. Then her application for a grant to continue her fluoride and central nervous system research was turned down by the US National Institute of Health (NIH), when an NIH panel told her that "fluoride does not have central nervous system effects"(Griffiths 1998).

Despite growing evidence that it is harmful to public health, US federal and state pubic health agencies and large dental and medical organizations such as the American Dental Association (ADA), continue to promote fluoride. Water fluoridation continues, despite the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s own scientists, whose union, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, has taken a strong stand against it. Dr. William Hirzy, vice president of Chapter 280, stated that "fluoride (that is added to municipal water) is a hazardous waste product for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits"( Mullenix 1998). Although fluoride is up to fifty times more toxic than sulfur dioxide, it is still not regulated as an air pollutant by the American Clean Air Act. Since thousands of tonnes of industrial fluoride waste is poured into drinking water supplies all over North America, supposedly to encourage gleaming smiles in our children, big industry in the US has the benefit of emitting as much fluoride waste into the environment as they like with absolutely no requirement to measure emissions and no way of being held accountable for poisoning people, animals and vegetation.

In August 2003, the EPA requested that the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), re-evaluate water fluoride safety standards by reviewing recent scientific literature, because the last review in 1993 had major gaps in research. "Neither the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), nor the National Institute for Dental Research (NIDR), nor the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry has any proof on fluoride’s safety or effectiveness"(Sterling 1993). The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology has classified fluoride as an unapproved dental medicament due to it’s high toxicity and the US National Cancer Institute Toxicological Program has found fluoride to be an "equivocal carcinogen" (Maurer 1990).

Currently the US government is continuing to introduce further fluoridation schemes throughout the country, including the Water Act passed in November 2003, which has made it impossible for water companies to undergo civil or criminal hearings as a result of adding fluoride to public water supplies.

In a society where products containing asbestos, lead, beryllium and many other carcinogens have been recalled from the marketplace, it is surprising that fluoride is embraced so thoroughly and blindly. It seems absurd that we would consider paying the chemical industry to dispose of their toxic waste by adding it to our water supply. Hiding the hazards of fluoride pollution from the public is a capitalist-style con job of epic proportions that has occurred because a powerful lobby wishes to manipulate public opinion in order to protect it’s own financial interests. "Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country... our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of" (Bernays 1991).

Related Video on Edward Bernays and Mass Manipulation:
The Century of the Self: The Untold History Of Controlling The Masses Through The Manipulation Of Unconscious Desires





Latest Commentary
- How Far Can the P2P Revolution Go?
- The Index Card of Allowable Opinion
- Should Government Have the Power to Quarantine?
- Obama Appointee Supports Individual Rights
- Let the Market Contain Ebola
- The State as a Royal Scam
- Glenn Greenwald TED Talk: Why Privacy Matters
- "Crush the Seed of Ishmael": A "Final Solution" to the "Muslim Problem"









Comments 101 - 120 of 160 Add Comment < Page of 8 >
Beth

Posted: Mar 24 2010, 11:50 AM

Link
76217 Chris is SO right on with what he says! So many people today appear to be functioning well on the outside, but inside they are evidently brain dead IDIOTS with not one lick of common sense or logic in them! Their idea of "proof" is what the news anchor on CNN or NBC tells them!(lol) OMG people, wake up & do your own homework! Seriously, put DOWN the remote, proceed to your computer and research this for YOURSELF. There are literally dozens of sources that support that sodium flouride in your water provides nothing GOOD for your teeth and results in a plethora of BAD for your entire body! In fact, it causes a multitude of ailments that shorten life span and cause decreased fertility. Result: massive population reduction! Now, I know this sounds "conspiratorial," but, psst, here's a lil' secret: IT'S NOT A THEORY, STUPID!! The wealthy elitists who actually run this country (no, it's NOT Obama, he's merely their puppet) have a very specific plan to control the world, and they are doing so in a very systematic, methodical way. Sound ludicrious? Hard to believe? I agree, it IS hard to believe, but it is nonetheless true. David Rockefeller himself, one of the leading New World Order billionaires, said this:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

Um, yep, that's right -- Mr. Rockefeller and all his wealthy banking cronies actually believe that THEY are far more superior and, thus, far better qualified to rule the world than the rest of us "common folk." Wow, if you can grasp the magnitude of what this man actually said (at a mtg of the clandestine Bilderberg Group in 1991 in Germany), you can begin to understand that there is every reason to believe there is more behind the poisoning of our water supply than concern for cavities in your teeth!! I highly recommend you search the "Georgia Guidestones," where their plan is actually set in stone tablets via an anonymous donor who purchased & paid for the land & materials. Hard to believe? Yes, but true! Also, I beg you to take the 2 hours (long, I know, but well worth it) and watch this PHENOMENAL video, which gives a very broad "big picture" of what this is really happening: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
Anonymous

Posted: May 10 2010, 5:17 PM

Link
204100 MJ,JMB
dental hygienist

Posted: May 21 2010, 12:41 AM

Link
7471 I am a dental hygienist. I have worked in communities that do not have fluoridated water. The amount of decay in regions with non-fluoridated water is astronomical!!!!!!!!!!! I have seen 17 -year old children needing full dentures. There is no doubt scientifically or clinically that fluoride is necessary. There are so very many substances in this world that are good for you in the right amount and harmful if overdosed. People have had fluorosis stains on their teeth and did not die from it. Water fluoridation is not a conspiracy! It's a method to keep your teeth and your children's teeth! One glass of red wine a day is supposedly good for you, 10 is not. Moderation is the key! Please do not be swayed by ignorant conspiracy theorists!!!! What could we possibly gain by wanting people to have less decay?
Anonymous

Posted: May 29 2010, 4:07 AM

Link
76176 We can fall into this adverserial bullshit, by saying some say Flouride is good and some say bad and maybe the truth is in the middle BS. Or we can use critical thinking skills to come to the conclusion that there is only one TRUTH. Either Flouride is a poision or it is not at the quantities that we have in our water and toothpaste. One thing we do know for sure is that the human body does not need flouride at all to function. Just because your dentist told you its good for you because of common convention and tradition does not make it good. I switched to using non flouridated tooth paste and my teeth felt better, lees tartar buildup and whiter than ever before. The truth is we do not need flouride. The truth is the government does not add something to the water to make ou teeth stronger just like they wouldnt give a dogs turd if you were dying of hunger and couldnt pay your bills. When did the government give a rats ass about its populace? So the argument that they do this for our teeth is bullocks.
Anonymous

Posted: May 29 2010, 4:12 AM

Link
76176 @dentalhygenist.What could we possibly gain by wanting people to have less decay You said it you freaking shill, you wuld gain nothing if people were healthy and gain the world if they were unhealthy and constantly needing a drug to keep them going.
Mark

Posted: May 31 2010, 3:05 PM

Link
17418 To Anonymouns (7536) above: "The problem that exists is that not everyone can afford dental care". Classic. What in the world did the people do for the 20,000 years before "dental care" existed? Let me guess: they did just fine. There are people in this world who don't even brush their teeth and have perfect teeth (See "Empty Harvest" by Mark Anderson, as one example). It's also a lame argument that putting flouride in the water is to keep brown spots off peoples teeth. Of all the things that could be done to help people, why is that the one chosen? Aren't there other things that we could be doing wrong that could be changed? There's a lot of problems that people have that are far worse than spots on the teeth. Anonymouns, I think you profit from putting the flouride in the water.
Anonymous

Posted: May 31 2010, 3:49 PM

Link
66233 As a physician, and having done some research on Flouride, it is true that flouride is very toxic, and it should never go into our water. I moved to the country to have a well, to get out of the flouride water.
However to say it is a capitalist conspiracy is not right. Capitalism in its pure form is FAMILY BUSINESS, many, many small businesses across the country. It works the best out of any financial systems. Large corporations are socialism and communism by definition, today called CORPORATISTS.
The Feds could add one law that would help and that is to keep companies to 500 employees at the most. As the corporatists and the rich are controlling the USA, we need to move to SELECTION day, instead of election day. A Lottery, where the selected (elected) officials are identified as far a qualifications, and then if they meet the qualifications their name is put into the hat. This would allow for GOD to have a chance at selection, for as it is now, only the Devil gets to pick.
bandwagon

Posted: Jun 13 2010, 5:19 PM

Link
800 I understand from a chemical law that fluorine knocks out chlorine, bromine and iodine. Each knock out the one below it. Poor old iodine gets wacked from all the previous. And iodine is used by the thyroid which controls metabolism.
I wonder if the chemicals added to water are instrumental in obesity?
Round here I understand they add aluminium sulphate, too.

Here in the UK, a law now allows medical authorities to instruct water companies to fluoridate, whereas before they could say no. But before agreeing, the water companies insisted on legal indemnities.
Must tell you something.
BW

Posted: Jun 13 2010, 5:50 PM

Link
800 China and India are trying to get fluoride OUT of the water. And recently Thailand? I think it was, reduced the allowable F in bottled water to 0.7ppm to reduce the incidence of dental fluorosis.
The British York review I believe, allowed no animal studies and was a study of previous studies. Beware folk who say they found no adverse effects, when really they have not looked for any. I gather the NHS does not test for fluoride, but private tests sometimes show people getting four times too much.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 28 2010, 1:11 PM

Link
74232 its about time to revolt, ladies and gentlemen
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 16 2010, 9:00 PM

Link
66207 I work in a plastic plant that blows flourine treated bottles for some major ag. companies for the past decade.They have never had one monitor to measure the ppm . When we have what we call a blowout either from contaminated plastic or process issues the fluorine is so strong it will eat the seams out of another bottle from another machine 500 ft away. They have always said that fluorine was a safe product ,I am a machine op. and set up man so i have to fix mach when this happens they have never supplied as much as a gas mask.I vomit at least once a month from this.our last incident involved our scrubber unit,atomizer plugged up , several of us were sick,our lead packer was so scared she called 911and explained we had a flourine leak ,in which they sent a hazmat crew down.Our plant manager turned them at the door and wouldnt let them into plant. he even went as far as listening to 911 recording i.d .ing and trying to have her arrested.little did he know she had been talking to osha and they put a stop to it. .Now less then 2 months after ,our plant has shut down in middle of a investigation not even as much as a week notice for a majority of the people just a swift goodbye .There explanation was a decline in the market.I was offered to stay for a bonus but they want me to sign a contract giving up all of my rights known or unknown. i recently went to doctor after this for a complete check up.I now am going to universty hospital for pulminary problems.the last doctor just didnt now anything about this gas as most people dont. I have seen this gas melt stainless like wood i can only speculate what it has done to me.I need help please from anyone interested It appears there is alot of smart people here on this blog I have many more horror stories about this gas if interested email me at askjerry20@yahoo .com and we can talk more any help would greatly be appreciated
Will

Posted: Jul 28 2010, 10:55 AM

Link
14435 It's an old principle, making profit from death. It started when Cain slew Abel and called it a "great secret, that I may murder for gain" and it's been practiced ever since. Prayer is the best defense, because as the Lord promises, "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that gives to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him."
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 07 2010, 12:53 PM

Link
156101 I dont really know much about this topic besides what I just read, All though I do remember reading an article of how it was giving to prisoners to make them submisive. But their is one thing I will say, this is proabably all true. Our goverment is not our goverment, its been taken over by politicians who want world control and to own every ounce of money they can get their hands on. Think as an american what do you or anyone you know really control? I know the answer is nothing, yall better wake up cause these people are not our friends and could care less about any of us or our loved ones. Honestly I have a 5 month old and if I find out im feeding her this shit, wow you have no idea. Time to wake up people your nobody to the higer ups. Thats all for now... GOD BLESS..
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2010, 1:42 AM

Link
17379 I like how this article has random parenthetical citations that act to deceive these easily fooled readers into believing this. First, there is no bibliography so we have no idea if these sources say what the author cites, let alone exist. I find it funny that people are saying that Americans should do some research into this topic when we can't even be sure this author has done any himself. I don't know if this is true or not but you all look like a bunch of fools for believing what this guy says. Drink bottled water and don't brush your teeth and see how well that turns out if u wanna test what is most likely complete bullshit.

Anonymous jan 23- you are a complete dumb ass. You do realize that once the sodium fluoride is dissolved in water it is simply sodium and flouride ions separated in the water. There are no "different" fluoride ions. The source is the only difference. Now I don't know if all fluoride ions are harmful, but im sure there aren't some harmful and some beneficial water-dissolved (aqueous) ions. Additionally flouride is not even close to a heavy metal, in fact, it is a gas in it's ion form. I honestly hope you were being sarcastic
brother james

Posted: Oct 27 2010, 8:20 PM

Link
12167 Could you link to some sorces, who's Stephen???
Glad I did my own homework!

Posted: Dec 22 2010, 8:30 AM

Link
98144 After reading through these comments and researching who has made the best arguments from scientific and and cited sources, The winners are the people trying to warn others about consuming deadly substances. The stupid people will continue to consume flouride and give it to their offspring, Darwin will win again and in a few generations only those smart enough to do their own homework will be the future survivors.

What a beautiful world it will be then.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 17 2011, 5:04 PM

Link
12823 Interesting article, but where are the actual references?! They are cited, but are not given!
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 17 2011, 7:29 PM

Link
6858 So do you mean Rockefeller Report and where are your references listed?! They are sited, but I can't verify them, hummmmm.....
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 20 2011, 6:39 PM

Link
58179 well well well. in australia here flouride is added all the time and it is hard to get a good water filter because all water filters that you can get readily here acutally have the Australian Dental Association Seal of Approval because they DON'T remove flouride! We are using unflouridated toothpaste now but our drinking water is taken from a little well like area that we have found to be good- we filter THAT water with the BRITA and then boil it. The thing is that it is a real hassle going down to the bus with five 12litre cartons to fill up every week or so!
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 23 2011, 12:19 AM

Link
760 they havn't given me enough flouride
Comments 101 - 120 of 160 < Page of 8 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

FBI Agents Cut Internet Access, Pose As Repairmen To Perform Warrantless Search - 10/30LAPD Officer Accused Of Punting Man's Face Like He Was 'Kicking A Field Goal' - 10/30Patriot Act, Passed to Fight Terrorism, Used Mostly In Drug Investigations - 10/30Mom Faces Jail For Using Cannabis Oil To Treat 15-Yr-Old Son's Chronic Pain - 10/30Sarcastic "God Bless You" Triggers Miami Cop To Go On Psychotic Tirade - 10/29Antonio Buehler Found Not Guilty After Almost 3 Years - 10/30"Crush the Seed of Ishmael": A "Final Solution" to the "Muslim Problem" - 10/09Cop Attempts to Tackle Topless Protester, Rams Head First Into Wall Instead - 10/29

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top