Media Hypes Unproven, Expensive Gilead Drug Remdesivir After Trashing ChloroquineChris Menahan
Apr. 17, 2020
Conservatism Inc. Goes All-In On Cassidy Hutchinson's "Devastating" Testimony
WSJ: Pfizer Trial Found Vaxxed Toddlers 'Were More Likely to Get Severely Ill With Covid'
Russia Declares Donbass Republic 'Fully Liberated'; U.S. Media Begins Walking Back 'Rosy' Coverage of Ukraine
San Francisco: School Board Votes to End Lowell High School's 'Anti-Racist' Lottery-Based Admission System After Grades Collapse
Crosby, Stills & Nash Return to Spotify After Joe Rogan Boycott Fails
The media waged a "jihad" against the Trump-touted, dirt-cheap anti-malaria drug chloroquine over the past few weeks by churning out endless articles hyping every last side effect and yet now they're applying little of the same skepticism towards the unproven, potentially dangerous and expensive Gilead drug Remdesivir.
STAT News on Thursday released an "early peak" at some data from Gilead trial showing results that were described as "encouraging."
As STAT News reported:
The University of Chicago Medicine recruited 125 people with Covid-19 into Gilead's two Phase 3 clinical trials. Of those people, 113 had severe disease. All the patients have been treated with daily infusions of remdesivir.The news certainly sounds promising, much like a lot of the news coming from doctors who have been treating patients with hydroxychloroquine and I hope they succeed.
That said, note the lack of skepticism in these headlines:
The headlines could have just as easily read: "Two Coronavirus Patients Die After Taking Experimental Drug Remdesivir That Was Touted by Trump."
Whereas hydroxychloroquine has been found to be highly effective in treating and preventing malaria and lupus, Remdesivir was developed to fight Ebola but ultimately found to be ineffective.
Biospace reported earlier this week that "about 25% of patients receiving [Remdesivir] have severe side effects, including multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury and low blood pressure."
"Another 23% demonstrated evidence of liver damage on lab tests," Biospace reported.
Whereas a recent global survey of over 6,000 doctors found hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin rated the "most effective" treatments for coronavirus -- both of which cost around $1 for a full course -- it has been predicted that Gilead's Remdesivir may cost around $1,000 for a full course.
Of course, no drug has yet to be proven effective at treating SARS-CoV-2 in any large-scale studies and no drug should be assumed to be a silver bullet but one has to wonder why the media which has been so intent on hyping the side effects of chloroquine and attacking President Trump for touting it is now touting remdesivir based off sparse data.
RELATED: Insider Trading? Huge Bet Made Shortly Before STAT News Report Touting Gilead's Remdesivir Results
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab and Minds.