Despite 1 In 5 Gay Men Having HIV, FDA Overturns 30-Yr Ban On Blood DonationsChristopher Menahan | InformationLiberation
Dec. 22, 2015
GOP 2020 War Plan: Lose The Election
French Family Adopts '16-Yr-Old' African Migrant With Receding Hairline And Bags Under His Eyes
Vox Media Pushes For YouTube to Ban PewDiePie
Alton Sterling's Eldest Son Arrested For Rape of 8-Year-Old Boy
California Effectively Rigs 2020 Democrat Presidential Race to Favor Richest Candidates
The U.S. government yesterday overturned a 30-year ban on gay men donating blood, the caveat being they must refrain from having sexual contact with other men for at least 12 months prior to any donation.
This 12 month deferral has gay rights groups upset and demanding their blood be treated "equally," despite the fact a recent CDC study reported almost 1 in 5 gay men are HIV positive, with 38% of gay men in Baltimore carrying HIV.
The Food and Drug Administration said its decision to reverse the policy was based on an examination of the latest science which shows that an indefinite ban is not necessary to prevent transmission of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.Despite the reasonable 12 month deferral, the National Gay Blood Drive Campaign released a statement saying the new policy is "discriminatory" and they won't be satisfied until the deferral process is "eliminated [..] altogether."
Openly gay Democrat congressman Jared Polis, co-chair of the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus, said "It is ridiculous and counter to the public health that a married gay man in a monogamous relationship can't give blood, but a promiscuous straight man who has had hundreds of opposite sex partners in the last year can."
Kelsey Louie of the New York-based HIV and AIDS service organization Gay Men's Health Crisis criticized the deferral requirement, saying "the FDA's 12-month deferral plan would still require gay and bisexual men to be celibate for a full year before they are allowed to donate blood, regardless of marital status and safe-sex practices... Heterosexuals are given no such restrictions, even if their sexual behavior places them at high risk for HIV."
Straight men don't face the same restriction because the number of straight men with HIV is around 1 in 780.
There's a reason for this ban, while the 12-month restriction sounds reasonable based off the data they've given, overturning it entirely in the name of "equality" would be insane.
Christopher Menahan runs the news site InformationLiberation.com. He thinks hypocritical hate-crime laws should be abolished. Follow @infolibnews on twitter.