Protesters Have No Free-Speech Rights on Supreme Court's Front PorchWashington PostAug. 29, 2015 |
America Last: House Bill Provides $26B for Israel, $61B for Ukraine and Zero to Secure U.S. Border
Bari Weiss' Free Speech Martyr Uri Berliner Wants FBI and Police to Spy on Pro-Palestine Activists
Telegram Founder Changed Mind on Setting Up Shop in San Francisco After Being Robbed Leaving Twitter HQ
Report: Blinken Sitting On Staff Recommendations to Sanction Israeli Military Units Linked to Killings or Rapes
MSNBC's Joy Reid Celebrates Prosecution of Trump as Racial Revenge Against Whitey
Protesters do not have a First Amendment right to congregate on the grand marble plaza in front of the Supreme Court, only on the sidewalk in front of it, a unanimous federal appeals court panel ruled Friday. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a law that forbids demonstrations on the grounds of the high court, on the premise that demonstrations on the court's doorsteps might lead to the perception that the court is swayed by public opinion rather than the dictates of the law. The law, passed in 1949, "promotes the understanding that the Court resolves the matters before it without regard to political pressure or public opinion," wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan, who has argued often before the court as a lawyer and is sometimes mentioned as a future inhabitant of the Supreme Court building. "Allowing demonstrations directed at the Court, on the Court's own front terrace, would tend to yield the opposite impression: that of a Court engaged with-- and potentially vulnerable to -- outside entreaties by the public." Read More |